Social Media and Soft Power: Positioning Turkey’s Image on Twitter

in Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This paper explores how Turkey is using social media via Twitter, a public relations strategy, to spread its messages and to establish itself within the international community. Turkey appears to be situating itself as a European, progressive, democratic, secular and Muslim nation that has the potential to influence nations in the Middle East. The rise of social media has revolutionized the way states communicate with the international community. To that end, this study analyzed three top Turkish governmental officials’ personal and official Twitter accounts to examine how Turkey is cultivating its national image using Twitter. The findings suggest Turkey is wielding its soft-power in both the West and the Middle East/North Africa regions. Yet the quantitative analysis reveals that the western emphasis is more prominent in the messages. In its Twitter messages, the Turkish government follows an image cultivation and information subsidy approach in public diplomacy. Contrary to the highly interactive features of this social media tool, Turkish bureaucracy is not engaged in building relationships with its publics through Twitter.

Social Media and Soft Power: Positioning Turkey’s Image on Twitter

in Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication



  • AlbrittonRobert B. and ManheimJarol B. (1983). News of Rhodesia: The Impact of a Public Relations Campaign. Journalism Quarterly 60(4): 622628.

  • —— (1985). Public Relations Efforts for the Third World: Images in the News. Journal of Communication 35(1): 4359.

  • Alexa. Top Sites. Accessed 12 August 2012:

  • AltheideDavid L. (1996). Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • AltunisikMeliha (2005). The Turkish Model and Democratization in the Middle East. Arab Studies Quarterly 27(1/2): 118.

  • —— (2009). Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East. New Perspectives on Turkey 40: 171194.

  • ArasBulent and BicakciSalih (2006). Europe, Turkey and the Middle East: Is Harmonization possible?East European Quarterly 40(3) 367381.

  • ArasBulent and GorenerAylin (2010). National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policy Orientation: The Ideational Bases of Justice and Development Party’s Foreign Policy Activism in the Middle East. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 12(1): 7392.

  • BergBruce L. (2007). Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • BotanCarl H. and TaylorMaureen (2004). Public Relations: State of the Field. Journal of Communication 54(4): 645661.

  • BouldingKenneth (1977). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • CarvinAndy (2011). A Nobel Peace Prize for the Arab Spring? Who Would That Go To?NPR. Accessed 12 August 2012: 6 October 2011.

  • CastellsManuel (2004). The Network Society: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

  • —— (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication 1(1): 238266.

  • —— (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 7893.

  • DavutoğluAhmet (2004). Strategic Depth. Istanbul: Kure Yayinlari.

  • —— (2010). Turkey’s Zero-problem Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy. Accessed 12 September 2011: 6 September 2010.

  • FaiolaAnthony (2011). Egypt’s Military Rulers Assert Wider Powers in Wake of Attack on Israeli Embassy. Washington Post. Accessed 12 August 2012: 16 September 2011.

  • FergusonMary Ann T. (1984). Building Theory in Public Relations: Inter-organizational Relationships as Public Relations Paradigm. Paper presented to the conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Gainesville, FL.

  • GandyOscar H. (1982). Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • GrunigJames E. (1992). Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • —— (1993). Image and Substance: From Symbolic to Behavioral Relationships. Public Relations Review 91(2): 121139.

  • HallAlice (2000). The Mass Media, Cultural Identity and Perceptions of National Character: An Analysis of Frames in US and Canadian Coverage of Audiovisual Materials in the GATT. International Communication Gazette 62(3–4): 231249.

  • KardasSaban (2010). Turkey: Redrawing the Middle East Map or Building Sandcastles?Middle East Policy 17(1): 115137.

  • KentMichael L. (2010). Directions in Social Media for Professional and Scholars. In HeathR. L. (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations pp. 643656. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • KirisciKemal (2009). The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State. New Perspectives on Turkey 40: 2957.

  • KunczikMichael (1990). Images of Nations and International Public Relations. Bonn, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung.

  • LarrabeeF. Stephen (2007). Turkey Rediscovers the Middle East. Foreign Affairs 86(4): 103112.

  • LefebvreHenri (1974). The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil: Blackwell.

  • L’EtangJacquie (1998). State Propaganda and Bureaucratic Intelligence: The Creation of Public Relations in 20th century Britain. Public Relations Review 24(4): 413441.

  • LoganDavid (2009). Turkey and its Middle Eastern neighbors: Threat or Opportunity for the European Union?Asian Affairs 40(1): 3443.

  • LukmanovA. (2010). Turkey: New Policies in the Middle East. International Affairs 57(1): 8594.

  • MacFarquharNeil (2011). As Autocrats are Toppled, Their Fates Grow More Extreme. New York Times. Accessed 12 August 2012: 20 October 2011.

  • ManheimJarol (1994). Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McNairBrian (2005). An Introduction to Political Communication. New York: Routledge.

  • NohlArnd-Michael (2010). Changing Expectations: Notes from the History of the BBC’s Turkish Service. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 3(2): 171191.

  • NyeJoseph (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

  • —— (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 94109.

  • OğuzluTarik (2007). Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs 61(1): 8197

  • —— (2008). Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West?Turkish Studies 9(1): 1328.

  • —— (2010). Turkey and Europeanization of Foreign Policy?Political Science Quarterly 125(4): 657683.

  • OnisZiya (2003). Turkey and the Middle East after September 11: The Importance of the EU Dimension. Turkish Policy Quarterly 2(4): 8495.

  • RaoLeena (2011). New Twitter Stats: 140M Tweets Sent Per Day, 460K Accounts Created Per Day. Tech Crunch. Accessed 12 August 2012: 14 March 2011.

  • SecorAnna (2011). Turkey’s Democracy: A Model for the Troubled Middle East?Eurasian Geography and Economics 52(2): 157172.

  • ShadidAnthony (2011). In Riddle of Mideast Upheaval, Turkey Offers Itself as an Answer. New York Times. Accessed 12 August 2012: 26 September 2011.

  • ShielsMaggie (2011). Twitter Co-founder Jack Dorsey Rejoins Company. BBC News. Accessed 12 August 2012: 28 March 2011.

  • SignitzerBenno H. and CoombsTimothy (1992). Public Relations and Public Diplomacy: Conceptual Convergences. Public Relations Review 18(2): 137147.

  • SignitzerBenno H. and WasmerCarola (2006). Public Diplomacy: A Specific Government Public Relations Function. In BotanC. H. and HazeltonV. (eds.) Public Relations Theory 2 pp. 435464. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • SlyLiz (2011). In Syria, Defectors form Dissident Army in Sign Uprising May be Entering New Phase. Washington Post. Accessed 12 August 2012: 25 September 2011.

  • SprinthallRichard C. (2007). Basic Statistical Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • TaylorMaureen and KentMichael L. (2010). Anticipatory Socialization in the Use of Social Media in Public Relations: A Content Analysis of PRSA’s Public Relations Tactics. Public Relations Review 36(3): 207214.

  • WilsonEdward III (2008). Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences616: 110124.

  • YoumansWilliam L. (2009). Humor Against Hegemony: Al-Hurra, Jokes, and the Limits of American Soft Power. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 2: 7699.

  • YunSeong-Hun (2006). Toward Public Relations Theory-Based Study of Public Diplomacy: Testing the Applicability of the Excellence Study. Journal of Public Relations Research 18(4): 287312.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 108 108 21
Full Text Views 67 67 10
PDF Downloads 10 10 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0