Cassius Dio on Julia Domna: A Study of the Political and Ethical Functions of Biographical Representation in Dio’s Roman History

in Mnemosyne
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Of the individuals who appear in the closing books of Cassius Dio’s Roman History, there is perhaps none more beguiling than Julia Domna. Dio’s account of the life of Domna is the fullest surviving from antiquity. Yet, Dio’s portrayal of Domna is not a miscellany of facts about the empress, and thus should not be treated as such. Rather, it is a contrived literary portrayal that fulfilled important moralizing functions within the Severan narrative of the Roman History. This article provides an analysis of Dio’s portrayal of Domna. It suggests that Dio shaped his portrayal of Domna to serve two purposes within the text: firstly, to act as a foil to his portrayals of C. Fulvius Plautianus and Caracalla; and, secondly, to explore through the figure of Domna political and ethical themes relevant to Dio’s appraisal of the Severan period.

Mnemosyne

A Journal of Classical Studies

Sections

References

AmelingW. Cassius Dio und Bithynien EA 1984 4 123 138

BahraniZ. Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Babylon 2001 London

BalsdonJ.P.V.D. Roman Women: Their History and Habits 1963 New York

Bering-StaschewskiR. Römische Zeitgeschichte bei Cassius Dio 1981 Bochum

BirdH.W. Aurelius Victor on Women and Sexual Morality CJ 1982 78 1 44 48

BirdH.W. Aurelius Victor: De Caesaribus 1994 Liverpool

BirleyA. Septimius Severus: The African Emperor 1971 London

BirleyA. The African Emperor: Septimius Severus 1988 London

BoissevainU.P. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiarum Romanarum Quae Supersunt 1955-69 Berlin

BowersockG. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire 1969 Oxford

BruntP.A. On Historical Fragments and Epitomes CQ 1980 30 2 477 494

CampbellB. BowmanA.K.GarnseyP.CameronA. The Severan Dynasty The Cambridge Ancient History2 XII: The Crisis of Empire 2005 Cambridge 1 28

DoreyT.A. DoreyT.A. ‘Agricola’ and ‘Germania’ Tacitus 1969 London

EdwardsC. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome 1993 Cambridge

EismanM.M. Dio and Josephus: Parallel Analyses REL 1977 36 657 673

FlintermanJ-J. Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs, and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius 1995 Amsterdam

FurneauxH. De Germania 1894 Oxford

GowingA. Cassius Dio on the Reign of Nero ANRW 1997 2558 2590 2.34.3

HarringtonJ.D. Cassius Dio: A Reexamination 1971 PhD Dissertation (Univ. of Kentucky)

HarrisB.F. Apollonius of Tyana: Fact and Fiction JRH 1969 5 3 189 199

KettenhofenE. . Die syrischen Augustae in der historischen Überlieferung: Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Orientalisierung 1979 Bonn

Kuhn-ChenB. Geschichtskonzeptionen griechischer Historiker im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr.: Untersuchungen zu den Werken von Appian, Cassius Dio und Herodian 2002 Frankfurt

LanglandsR. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome 2006 Cambridge

LevickB. Julia Domna: Syrian Empress 2007 London

Lo CascioE. BowmanA.K.GarnseyP.CameronA. The Emperor and His Administration The Cambridge Ancient History2 XII: The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193-337 2005 Cambridge 131 181

MazzaM. Lotte sociali e restaurazione autoritaria nel III secolo d.C. 1973 Rome

MillarF.G.B. A Study in Cassius Dio 1964 Oxford

MillarF.G.B. The Emperor in the Roman World 1992 London

MillerS.N. CookS.N.AdcockF.E.CharlesworthM.P. The Army and the Imperial House The Cambridge Ancient History XII: The Imperial Crisis and Recovery 1939 Cambridge

MilnorK. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus 2005 Oxford

MoscovichM.J. Historical Compression in Cassius Dio’s Account of the Second Century B.C. AW 1983 8 3/4 137 143

MoscovichM.J. Cassius Dio on the Death of Sophonisba AHB 1997 11 1 25 29

MoscovichM.J. Cassius Dio’s Palace Sources for the Reign of Septimius Severus Historia 2004 53 3 356 368

MurisonC.L. Rebellion and Reconstruction: Galba to Domitian 1999 Atlanta

NorthH.F. Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature 1966 Ithaca

PellingC. EdwardsM.J.SwainS. Biographical History? Cassius Dio on the Early Principate Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire 1997 Oxford 117 144

PlatnauerM. The Life and Reign of Septimius Severus 1918 London

PotterD.S. Literary Texts and the Roman Historian 1999 London

RichJ. CameronA. Dio on Augustus History as Text 1989 London 86 110

RubinZ. Civil War Propaganda and Historiography 1980 Bruxelles

SchwartzE. Cassius 40 Pauly’s Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 1899 6 Stuttgart 1684 1722 s.v. (esp. 1684-91)

SimonsB. Cassius Dio und die römische Republik: Untersuchungen zum Bild des römischen Gemeinwesens in den Büchern 3-35 der ῾Ρωµαϊκά 2009 Berlin/New York

SwanP.M. The Augustan Succession: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 55-56 (9 B.C.-A.D. 14) 2004 Oxford

SymeR. Tacitus 1958 Oxford

SymeR. Ammianus and the Historia Augusta 1969 Oxford

SymeR. The Historia Augusta Papers 1983 Oxford

WildP.S. Two Julias CJ 1917 13 1 14 24

WilliamsM.G. Studies in the Lives of Roman Empresses AJA 1902 6 3 259 305

YildirimB. BorgB.E. Identities and Empire: Local Mythology and the Self-Representation of Aphrodisias Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic 2004 Berlin 23 52

4)

E.g. Syme 1958, 273: (on Dio’s portrayal of Tiberius) “It lacks bite, intensity, and colour: it is antithetic but not epigrammatical, tortuous without profundity, and portentously abstract”, or Millar 1964, 55: (on Dio’s portrayal of Cicero) “Dio’s handling of Cicero is a failure, perhaps the most complete failure of his History”.

5)

E.g. Harrington 1971, 75-117; Moscovich 1983, 138, passim; Rich 1989, 86-110; Pelling 1997, 117-44; Gowing 1997 (ANRW 2.34.3), 2558-90.

7)

Cf. Kettenhofen 1979, 10-11. The use of two opposing characterisations as ethical and political foils to one another seems to be one of Dio’s favourite narrative devices, and I thank the anonymous reviewers for indicating several instances where Dio employs this method of presentation. Simons’ recent study has observed several instances of this method with respect to Dio’s narrative of the Roman Republic, such as the contrasting characterisations of Scipio Aemilianus and M. Manilius (2009, 249) and Scipio Africanus and Roman people (2009, 240).

11)

Millar 1964, 2, 195-203; Bering-Stachewski 1981, 6; Murison 1999, 1-2.

12)

Millar 1964, 1-2; Brunt 1980, 483; Potter 1999, 73; Murison 1999, 2-3.

20)

Eisman 1977, 670-1; Bering-Staschewski 1981, 65-6.

26)

D.C. 76.16.4. Cf. Bering-Staschewski 1981, 76; Birley 1988, 165.

27)

Levick 2007, 71. For the same trend in certain passages in Tacitus’ Germania, see Furneaux 1894, 7; Syme 1958, 1.126. Dorey (1969, 14) identifies the trend as a commonplace of 1st century rhetoric.

37)

E.g. D.C. 69.6.3, 79.15.4. Cf. Millar 1992, 4.

42)

Levick 2007, 24. See also Bowersock (1969, 108) for a similar reading of this passage. Murison (1999, 11) suggests that Dio’s pejorative descriptions of Caracalla’s ‘Syrian’ characteristics may have been a post-Severan addition/revision to his text.

43)

Levick 2007, 1.

48)

E.g. North 1966, 259-64; Langlands 2006, 2, 31.

50)

Birley 1971, 267; Moscovich 2004, 363.

61)

Cf. Kettenhofen 1979, 12: “Hier scheint bei Dio ein Stück literarischer Allgemeinbildung einsichtig zu werden, die im Falle von politisch einflußreichen Frauen die Exempla von Semiramis, Kleopatra, Nitokris heranzog.”

64)

See Yildirim 2004, 42-4. For Dio’s connections with the elite Greek culture in Asia Minor (especially in Bithynia), see Ameling (1984, 123 [n. 4], 135, passim).

79)

D.C. 77.15.4-5; cf. Bering-Staschewski 1981, 78 (and n. 444). As another possible parallel between the two sons, Dio suggests that both Caracalla and Commodus had played roles in the deaths of their fathers (cf. D.C. 71.33.42, 76.15.2).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 15 15 10
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0