Barwick C. Kühnert F. Charisii Artis grammaticae libri 1964 V Leipzig Ed. corr.

Barwick C. Kühnert F. Charisii Artis grammaticae libri 1964 V Leipzig Ed. corr. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bennett C.E. Syntax of Early Latin 1910 Vol. 1 Boston

Bennett C.E. Syntax of Early Latin 1910 Vol. 1 Boston )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bergk T. Beiträge zur lateinischen Grammatik 1870 Vol. 1 Halle

Bergk T. Beiträge zur lateinischen Grammatik 1870 Vol. 1 Halle )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bothe F.H. Poetarum Latii scenicorum fragmenta 1824 Vol. 2 Halberstadt (= Vol. 5.2 of Poetae scenici Latinorum)

Bothe F.H. Poetarum Latii scenicorum fragmenta 1824 Vol. 2 Halberstadt (= Vol. 5.2 of Poetae scenici Latinorum) )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Camerarius I. M. Accii Plauti Comoediae V magna cum cura emendatae 1545 Leipzig

Camerarius I. M. Accii Plauti Comoediae V magna cum cura emendatae 1545 Leipzig )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Daviault A. Comoedia Togata: Fragments 1981 Paris

Daviault A. Comoedia Togata: Fragments 1981 Paris )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Fabricius G. Fl. Sosipatri Charisii Artis Grammaticae libri quinque 1551 Basel

Fabricius G. Fl. Sosipatri Charisii Artis Grammaticae libri quinque 1551 Basel )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Keil H. Grammatici Latini 1857 Vol. 1 Leipzig

Keil H. Grammatici Latini 1857 Vol. 1 Leipzig )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lindemann F. Corpus Grammaticorum Latinorum ueterum 1840 Vol. 4 Leipzig

Lindemann F. Corpus Grammaticorum Latinorum ueterum 1840 Vol. 4 Leipzig )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lindsay W.M. Early Latin Verse 1922 Oxford

Lindsay W.M. Early Latin Verse 1922 Oxford )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

López A. Fabularum togatarum fragmenta: edición crítica 1983 Salamanca

López A. Fabularum togatarum fragmenta: edición crítica 1983 Salamanca )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Morris E.P. The Sentence-Question in Plautus and Terence: Concluding Paper AJP 1890 11 145 181

Morris E.P. The Sentence-Question in Plautus and Terence: Concluding Paper AJP 1890 11 145 181 )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Neukirch J.H. De fabula togata Romanorum: Accedunt fabularum togatarum reliquiae 1833 Leipzig

Neukirch J.H. De fabula togata Romanorum: Accedunt fabularum togatarum reliquiae 1833 Leipzig )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Putschius H. Grammaticae latinae auctores antiqui 1605 Hanau

Putschius H. Grammaticae latinae auctores antiqui 1605 Hanau )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Questa C. Titus Maccius Plautus: Casina 2001 Sarsina/Urbino

Questa C. Titus Maccius Plautus: Casina 2001 Sarsina/Urbino )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Ribbeck O. Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta 1898 Vol. 2 Leipzig ³, ²1873, ¹1855

Ribbeck O. Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta 1898 Vol. 2 Leipzig ³, ²1873, ¹1855 )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stephanus R. & Stephanus H. Fragmenta poetarum ueterum latinorum 1564 Geneva?

Stephanus R. Stephanus H. Fragmenta poetarum ueterum latinorum 1564 Geneva? )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Welsh J.T. A Magister in the Togata: C. Iulius Romanus on edio fidio (Charisius p. 258.1-7) Mnemosyne 2010a 63 276 279

Welsh J.T. A Magister in the Togata: C. Iulius Romanus on edio fidio (Charisius p. 258.1-7) Mnemosyne 2010a 63 276 279 )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Welsh J.T. The Grammarian C. Iulius Romanus and the Fabula Togata HSCP 2010b 105 255 285

Welsh J.T. The Grammarian C. Iulius Romanus and the Fabula Togata HSCP 2010b 105 255 285 )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bothe 1824, 179. On Iulius Romanus’ usage of quis, see Welsh 2010a.

Stephanus 1564, 53; Putschius 1605, 180. Neither Cyminius (who completed the editio princeps of Charisius in 1532) nor Fabricius (1551, 221) distinguished typographically between introduction and quotation, so it is impossible to tell how they interpreted the text.

For examples, see Welsh 2010b, 269-70.

Neukirch 1833, 227: “nihil autem inest laudis in Afranii uerbis, quod uult Sosipater; nisi quis scribendum existimet Ah! tu eloquens ilicet.”

Ribbeck 1855, 163; 1873, 191; 1898, 227. For reasons not made clear Daviault (1981, 195) and López López (1983, 122) both disregard this difficulty and print an.

On the text of this passage see Welsh 2010a. There I suspected that †emini† concealed some further comment of Iulius Romanus, rather than material from Titinius. Javier Uría Varela, per litteras, has offered the very attractive suggestion that †emini† conceals some form of de-/diminuo (which will have lost its prefix by haplography after edi medi), thereby making Iulius Romanus say that Titinius used edi as a shortened version of edius fidius.