‘Priest’—‘Eparchy-arch’—‘Speaker of the ethnos

The Areas of Responsibility of the Highest Officials of the Eastern Provincial Imperial Cult

In: Mnemosyne
Marco Vitale Faculty of Classics, University of Oxford The Ioannou Centre for Classical and Byzantine Studies 66 St Giles’, Oxford ox1 3lu

Search for other papers by Marco Vitale in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In the Roman Eastern provinces, the concept and rituals of a province-wide imperial cult were based on a pre-existing tradition of Hellenistic ruler’s divinization and worship. But its formal mise en place was conformed to the new territorial framework of Roman administration: a gubernatorial provincia/ἐπαρχεία appears subdivided into several administrative sub-provinces that were likewise called provinciae/ἐπαρχεῖαι. The cities of almost all known eparchies in terms of sub-provinces formed koina responsible for the provincial imperial cult and the political representation of the provincials headed by priestly officials, such as bithyniarchai or ‘(high-)priests of the eparchy/-ies’, whose titles refer explicitly to the represented sub-province. The correlation between these koina and Roman territorial administration from almost all Eastern provinces demands more political functions of the koinon-officials than only priestly ones, as shown by the frequently combined titulatures.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 311 37 2
Full Text Views 212 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 57 14 0