Argumentative Strategies in the ‘Platonic Section’ of Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride (chapters 45-64)

in Mnemosyne
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride has been studied from several points of view. In this paper I set out to demonstrate first of all that the core of the work fully rests on Plato’s philosophy, since according to Plutarch’s methodological assumptions Plato had grasped the truth hidden behind the Isis myth. Then I shall focus on the argumentative structure of the work, highlighting its twofold nature. The De Iside is entirely structured as a philosophical zetema, whose apex rests on Plato’s doctrine. Finally, I will argue that the ‘Platonic section’ (45-64) is framed in a different way, its aim being to progressively deepen Plutarch’s underlying assumption: the notion of the dualistic nature of being.

Argumentative Strategies in the ‘Platonic Section’ of Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride (chapters 45-64)

in Mnemosyne

Sections

References

BabutD. Plutarque et le Stoïcisme 1969 Paris

BaltesM. La dottrina dell’anima in Plutarco Elenchos 2000 21 245 270

BianchiU. Plutarch und der Dualismus anrw ii 1987 36 1 350 365

BrenkF. An Imperial Heritage: The Religious Spirit of Plutarch of Cheroneia anrw 1987 36 1 248 349

BrenkF. Pérez JiménezA.Garcìa LòpezJ.AnguilarR.M. Isis is a Greek Word. Plutarch’s Allegorization of Egyptian Religion Plutarco Platon y Aristoteles 1999 Madrid 226 238

BrenkF. Pérez-JiménezCasadesus Bordoy In the Image Reflection and Reason of Osiris. Plutarch and the Egyptian Cults 2001 83 98

ChlupR. Plutarch’s Dualism and the Delphic Cult Phronesis 2000 45 138 159

DeuseW. Untersuchungen zur mittelplatonischen und neuplatonischen Seelenlehre 1983 Wiesbaden

DillonJ.M. The Middle Platonists 1977 London

DillonJ.M. FredeD.LaksA. Plutarch and the God: Theodicy and Cosmogony in the Thought of Plutarch Traditions of Theology. Studies in Hellenistic Theology Its Background and Aftermath 2002 Leiden-Boston-Köln 223 237

DoniniP. GalloI.LaurentiR. Plutarco e i metodi dell’esegesi filosofica I Moralia di Plutarco 1992 Napoli 79 96

DoniniP. Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica anrw ii 1994 36 7 5027 5100

DoniniP. Plutarco. Il volto della Luna 2011 Napoli

DörrieH.BaltesM. Der Platonismus in der Antike 2. Der hellenistische Rahmen des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 1990

ErlerM. GiannantoniG.GiganteM. Philologia Medicans. La lettura delle opere di Epicuro nella sua scuola Epicureismo greco e romano 1996 Napoli 513 526

FerrariF. Dio idee e materia. La struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea 1995 Napoli

FerrariF. La generazione precosmica e la struttura della materia in Plutarco mh 1996 53 44 55

FerrariF. GalloI.MoreschiniC. La letteratura filosofica di carattere esegetico in Plutarco I generi letterari in Plutarco 2000 Napoli 147 175

FerrariF. Struttura e funzione dell’esegesi testuale nel Medioplatonismo: il caso del Timeo Athenaeum 2001 89 525 574

FerrariF. Plutarco. La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo 2002 Napoli

FroidefondC. Plutarque. Oeuvres Morales V2. Isis et Osiris2 2003 Paris

GriffithsJ. Plutarch’s De Iside et Osiride 1970 Cambridge

HaniJ. La religion egyptiénne dans la pensée de Plutarque 1976 Paris

Hirsch-LuipoldR. Plutarchs Denken in Bildern 2002 Tübingen

JonesC.P. Towards a Chronology of Plutarch’s Works jrs 1966 56 61 74

KrämerH.J. Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin 1964 Amsterdam

MansfeldJ. Heresiography in Context. Hippolitus Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy 1992 Leiden-New York-Köln

Opsomer.J. Fernández DelgadoJ.A.Pordomingo PardoF. ζητήµατα. Structure et argumentation dans les Quaestiones Platonicae Estudios sobre Plutarco. Aspectos Formales 1996 Salamanca 71 83

Opsomer.J. AdamsonP.BaltussenH.StoneM.W.F. Plutarch’s De animae Procreatione in Timaeo. Manipulation or search for consistency? Philosophy Science and Exegesis in Greek Latin and Arabic Commentaries 2004 London 137 162

Opsomer.J. BoulogneJ.BrozeM.CouloubaritsisL. Éléments stoïciens dans le De E apud Delphos de Plutarque Les platonismes des premiers siècles de notre ère. Plutarque L’E de Delphes 2006 Bruxelles 147 170

Opsomer.J. SharplesR.W.SorabjiR. Plutarch on the One and the Dyad Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 bc-200 ad 2007 II London 379 395

Opsomer.J. BrouilletteX.GiavattoA. Arguments non linéaires et pensée en cercle. Forme et argumentation dans les Questions Platoniciennes de Plutarque Les Dialogues Platoniciens chez Plutarque. Stratégies et Méthodes Exégétiques 2011 Leuven 93 116

Opsomer.J. BarneyR.BrennanT.BrittainC. Plutarch on the Division of the Soul Plato and the Divided Self 2012 Cambridge 311 330

Opsomer.J. BeckM. Plutarch and the Stoics A Companion to Plutarch 2014 88 103

Pérez-JimémezA.Casadesus BordoyF. Estudios sobre Plutarco. Misticismo y Religiones Mystéricas en la Obra de Plutarco. Actas del viii Simposio Español sobre Plutarco 2001 Madrid-Málaga 2001

RichterD.S. Plutarch on Isis and Osiris: Text, Cult, and Cultural Appropriation TAPhA 2000 131 191 216

RoskamG. Pérez JiménezCasadesus Bordoy “And a Great Silence Filled the Temple . . .” Plutarch on the Connections Between Mystery Cults and Philosophy 2001 221 231

18

See Hirsch-Luipold 2002184. Scholars have also argued that Plutarch here does not endorse a dualistic perspective (see e.g. Brenk 1987 294-298). In the last twenty years however the fundamental role of dualism in the De Iside has been widely acknowledged albeit with different nuances: Bianchi 1987; Ferrari 1995 72-80; Chlup 2000; Opsomer 2007 384-385 (conclusively contra Chlup).

23

See above all Ferrari 1995103.

25

Ferrari 199569-113has conclusively demonstrated that Plutarch’s position is exegetically grounded in some key passages of Plato’s Timaeus.

32

See again Ferrari 199590-104and 1996.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 4
Full Text Views 81 81 42
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0