Thaumastic Acoustics

Typhoeus and ‘Ty-phonics’ in Pindar, Pythian 1.26 and Hesiod, Theogony 834

in Mnemosyne
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article considers Pindar’s use of the expression θαῦµα … ἀκοῦσαι, ‘a wonder to hear’, in Pythian 1 to describe the monster Typhoeus. I argue that the expression needs to be read against Hesiod’s use of a similar locution, θαύµατ’ ἀκοῦσαι, to describe Typhoeus in the Theogony. There, Hesiod adapts the common epic formula θαῦµα ἰδέσθαι, producing a unique phrase to indicate Typhoeus’ chaotic blending of sights and sounds, and at the same time his disruption of the rules of poetic communication. Typhoeus’ disharmonious poetics there stands in contrast to the orderly image of the choral Muses in the proem. I argue in turn that Pindar subtly reworks the Hesiodic formula to reflect Typhoeus’ defeat by Zeus, and thereby subsumes the monster’s ‘acoustics’ within the θαῦµα of the choral performance of the ode itself.

Thaumastic Acoustics

Typhoeus and ‘Ty-phonics’ in Pindar, Pythian 1.26 and Hesiod, Theogony 834

in Mnemosyne

Sections

References

AthanassakiL. (2009). Narratology, Deixis, and the Performance of Choral Lyric. On Pindar’s First Pythian Ode. In: J. Grethlein and A. Rengakos eds. Narratology and Interpretation. The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient LiteratureBerlin pp. 241-273.

BallabrigaA. (1990). Le dernier adversaire de Zeus. Le mythe de Typhon dans l’épopée grecque archaïque. RHR 207 pp. 3-30.

BeckerA.S. (1995). The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham.

BlaiseF. (1992). L’Épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d’ Hésiode. REG 105 pp. 349-370.

ClayJ.S. (2003). Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge.

CollinsD. (1992). Hesiod and the Divine Voice of the Muses. Arethusa 32 pp. 241-262.

DaviesM. and FinglassP.J.eds. (2014). Stesichorus. The Poems. Cambridge.

DetienneM. and VernantJ.P. (1978). Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Translated by J. Lloyd. Atlantic Highlands.

Di BenedettoV. (1995). Tifone in Pindaro e in Eschilo. RFIC 123 pp. 129-139.

FennellC.A.M. (1893). Pindar. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. Cambridge.

FordA. (1992). Homer. The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca.

GantzT. (1993). Early Greek MythVolume 1. Baltimore.

GentiliB.BernardiniP.A.CinganoE. and GianniniP.eds. (1995). Pindaro. Le Pitiche. Milan.

GoslinO. (2010). Hesiod’s Typhonomachy and the Ordering of Sound. TAPhA 140 pp. 351-373.

GriffithM. ed. (1983). Aeschylus. Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.

HardieP. (2012). Rumour and Renown. Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.

HubbardT.K. (1987). The ‘Cooking’ of Pelops. Pindar and the Process of Mythological Revisionism. Helios 14 pp. 3-21.

HunzingerC. (1994). Le plaisir esthétique dans l’épopée archaïque. Les mots de la famille de thauma. Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé pp. 4-30.

HunzingerC. (2005). La perception du merveilleux. Thaumazō et thēeomai. In: L. Villard ed. Études sur la vision dans l’Antiquité classiqueRouen/Le Havre pp. 29-38.

HunzingerC. (2015). Wonder. In: P. Destrée and P. Murray eds. A Companion to Ancient AestheticsHoboken pp. 422-437.

KaimioM. (1977). Characterization of Sound in Early Greek Literature. Helsinki.

KlingerF. (1935). Das erste pythische Gedicht Pindars. Die Antike 11 pp. 49-66.

KollmannO. (1989). Das Prooimion der ersten pythischen Ode Pindars. Ein sprachlich-poetischer Kommentar. Vienna.

KurkeL. (2012). The Value of Chorality in Ancient Greece. In: J. Papadopoulos and G. Urton eds. The Construction of Value in the Ancient WorldLos Angeles pp. 218-235.

KurkeL. (2013). Imagining Chorality. Wonder, Plato’s Puppets, and Moving Statues. In: A.E. Peponi ed. Performance and Culture in Plato’s LawsCambridge pp. 123-170.

LachenaudG. (2013). Les routes de la voix. L’antiquité grecque et le mystère de la voix. Paris.

LeclercM.-C. (1993). La parole chez Hésiode. A la recherce de l’harmonie perdue. Paris.

LedbetterG. (2003). Poetics before Plato. Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton.

Lev KenaanV. (2008). Pandora’s Senses. The Feminine Character of the Ancient Text. Madison.

LovattH. (2013). Hesiod and the Divine Gaze. Helios 40 pp. 143-166.

MaceS.T. (1992). Pindarus HesiodicusDissertation Yale University.

MetteH.J. (1960). ‘Schauen’ und ‘Staunen’. Glotta 39 pp. 49-71.

MorganK.A. (2015). Pindar and the Construction of Syracusan Monarchy in the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford.

MorrisonA.D. (2007). Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes. London.

MostG.W. (2006). Hesiod. Theogony Works and Days Testimonia. Cambridge, MA.

MousbahovaV. (2009). Typhos Myth in Pindar’s Pyth. 1, 15-28 and PV 351-372. Hyperboreus 15 pp. 5-34.

NeerR.T. (2010). The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.

OgdenD. (2013). Drakōn. Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Oxford.

PaleyF.A. (1883). The Epics of Hesiod. With an English Commentary. London.

PeponiA.E. (2009). Choreia and Aesthetics in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo. The Performance of the Delian Maidens (Lines 156-64). ClAnt 28 pp. 39-70.

PowerT. (2011). Cyberchorus. Pindar’s Κηληδόνες and the Aura of the Artificial. In: L. Athanassaki and E. Bowie eds. Archaic and Classical Choral Song. Performance Politics and DisseminationBerlin pp. 67-114.

PrierR.A. (1989). Thauma Idesthai. The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek. Tallahassee.

RaceW.H. (1997). Pindar. Olympian Odes. Pythian Odes. Cambridge, MA.

RoodN. (2007). Hesiod’s Metallurgy Simile (Th. 861-7). Cambridge Classical Journal 53 pp. 112-123.

SaïdS. (1977). Les combats de Zeus et le problème des interpolations dans la Théogonie d’HésiodeREG 90 pp. 183-210.

ScodelR. (2001). Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar. In: J. Watson ed. Speaking Volumes. Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman WorldLeiden pp. 109-137.

ScottJ.A. (1897). A Comparative Study of Hesiod and PindarDissertationJohns Hopkins University.

SegalC. (1998). Aglaia. The Poetry of Alcman Sappho Pindar Bacchylides and Corinna. Lanham.

SimpsonM. (1969). The Chariot and the Bow as Metaphors for Poetry in Pindar’s Odes. TAPhA 100 pp. 437-473.

SolmsenF. (1982). The Earliest Stages in the History of Hesiod’s Text. HSPh 86 pp. 1-31.

SommersteinA.H. ed. (2008). Aeschylus. Persians Seven Against Thebes Suppliants Prometheus Bound. Cambridge, MA.

StamatopoulouZ. (2008). Boiotos aner tade phonesen. The Reception of Hesiod in Epinician PoetryDissertationUniversity of Virginia.

StamatopoulouZ. (2017). Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry. Reception and Transformation in the Fifth Century BCE. Cambridge.

SteinerD.T. (2007). Feathers Flying. Avian Poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus. AJPh 218 pp. 177-208.

StoddardK. (2004). The Narrative Voice in the Theogony of Hesiod. Leiden.

StokesM. (1962). Hesiodic and Milesian Cosmogonies I. Phronesis 7 pp. 1-37.

TelòM. (2014). Aristophanes vs Typhon. Co(s)mic Rivalry, Voice and Temporality in Knights. Ramus 43 pp. 25-44.

TooY.L. (1998). The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford.

TsagalisC. (2013). Typhon and Eumelus’ Titanomachy. Trends in Classics 5 pp. 19-48.

WeissN. (2016). The Choral Architecture of Pindar’s Eighth Paean. TAPhA 146 pp. 237-255.

WestM.L. (1966). Hesiod. Theogony. Oxford.

WickkiserB.L. (2010). Hesiod and the Fabricated Woman. Poetry and Visual Art in the Theogony. Mnemosyne 63 pp. 557-576.

WormsF. (1953). Der Typhoeus-Kampf in Hesiods Theogonie. Hermes 81 pp. 29-44.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 6
Full Text Views 13 13 13
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0