Epicurus’ Varietas and ἡ κινητικὴ ἡδονή

in Mnemosyne
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



According to Epicurus’ view which locates the summit of pleasure in the absence of all pain, once pain has been removed pleasure cannot be increased, but it can be embellished. This article has two main aims. Firstly I shall deal with this embellishment, namely the pleasure beyond the absence of pain (the varietas), and discuss its exact place within the Epicurean theory of pleasures; I argue that varietas pertains only to pleasures concerning the body. Secondly, and on the basis of my findings concerning the Epicurean varietas, I shall offer a redefinition of the concept of kinetic pleasures and argue that the pair natural-unnatural is the axis by which the kinetic pleasures are to be divided into pleasures concerning the body and pleasures concerning the soul respectively. I shall end by referring to a well disputed question concerning the Epicurean way of living, namely the question: “was Epicurus an ascetic?”.


A Journal of Classical Studies



Bailey, C. 1926. Epicurus. The Extant Remains (Oxford)

Bailey, C. 1928. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus (Oxford)

Bignone, E. 2003. La formazione dell’etica epicurea, A&R 36, 217-311

Brunschwig, J., Sedley, D.N. 2003. Hellenistic Philosophy, in: Sedley, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge), 151-183

Einarson, B., De Lacy, P.H. (trans). 1967. Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. 14 (Cambridge, MA)

Everson, S. 1999. Epicureanism, in: Furley, D. (ed.) From Aristotle to Augustine. The Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. 2 (London), 188-221

Erler, M., Schofield, M. 1999. Epicurean Ethics, in: Algra, K., Barnes, J., Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge), 642-674

Gosling, J.C.B., Taylor, C.C.W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure (Oxford)

Gummere, R.M. (trans.) 1917-1925. Seneca. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, 3 vols. (Cambridge, MA)

Hicks, R.D. (trans.) 1925. Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Cambridge, MA)

Inwood, B., Gerson, L.P. 1994. The Epicurus Reader (Indianapolis)

Kristeller, P.O. 1993. Greek Philosophers of the Hellenistic Age (New York)

Liebersohn, Y.Z. 2015. Epicurus’ “Kinetic” and “Katastematic” Pleasures. A Reappraisal, Elenchos 36, 271-296

Liebersohn, Y.Z. 2016. Τὸ κατ᾿ ἔνδειαν ἀλγοῦν and Epicurean Katastematic Pleasures, Organon 48, 5-19

Long, A.A., Sedley, D.N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. (Cambridge)

Nikolsky, B. 2001. Epicurus On Pleasure, Phronesis 46, 440-465

O’Connor, D.K. 1989. The Invulnerable Pleasures of Epicurean Friendship, GRBS 30,165-186

Purinton, J. 1993. Epicurus on the Telos, Phronesis 38, 292-302

Rackham, R. (trans). 1914. Cicero. De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum (Cambridge, MA)

Rist, J. 1972. Epicurus. An Introduction (Cambridge)

Sedley, D. 1976. Epicurus and his professional Rivals, in: Bollack, J., Laks, A. (eds.) Études sur l’épicurisme antique (Lille), 121-159

Smith, M.F. 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription (Napoli)

Striker, G. 1996. Epicurean Hedonism, in: Striker, G., Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics (Cambridge), 196-208

Woolf, R. 2009. Pleasure and Desire, in: Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism (Cambridge), 158-178



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 6 6 4
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0