Thrasyboulos and the Perforated Labor of Bees: Pindar’s Pythian 6.52-54

in Mnemosyne
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Thrasyboulos and the Perforated Labor of Bees: Pindar’s Pythian 6.52-54

in Mnemosyne


AthanassakiL. (2012). Performance and Reperformance. The Siphnian Treasury Evoked. In: P. AgócsC. Carey and R. Rawles eds. Reading the Victory OdeCambridge pp. 134-157.

AthanassakiL. (2016). The Symposion as Theme and Performance Context in Pindar’s Epinicians. In: V. CazzatoD. Obbink and E.E. Prodi eds. The Cup of Song. Studies on Poetry and the SymposionOxford pp. 85-112.

BundyE. (1962). Studia Pindarica. Berkeley/Los Angeles.

BurnettA.P. (2010). Pindar. Victory Odes. Baltimore.

CareyC. (1981). A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar. New York.

DrachmannA.B. ed. (1910). Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina Volume 2: Scholia in Pythionicas. Stuttgart.

EckermanC. (2011). Pindar’s Pythian 6. On the Place of Performance and an Interpretive Crux. RhM 153 pp. 1-8.

EckermanC. (2012). Was Epinician Poetry Performed at Panhellenic Sanctuaries? GRBS 52 pp. 338-360.

EckermanC. (2014). Pindar’s Delphi. In: K. Gilhuly and N. Worman eds. Place Space and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and CultureCambridge pp. 21-62.

FarnellL.R. (1932). The Works of Pindar Volume 2: Critical Commentary. London.

FennellC. (1879). Pindar. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. Cambridge.

FerrariF. (2008). Pindaro. Pitiche. Milan.

GentiliB.BernardiniP.A.CinganoE. and GianniniP. (1995). Pindaro. Le Pitiche. Milan.

GildersleeveB. (1890). The Olympian and Pythian Odes. New York.

GreengardC. (1980). The Structure of Pindar’s Epinician Odes. Amsterdam.

KurkeL. (1990). Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry. TAPhA 120 pp. 85-107.

LattimoreR. (1947). The Odes of Pindar. Chicago.

MezgerF. (1880). Pindars Siegeslieder. Leipzig.

MillerA. (1993). Pindaric Mimesis. The Associative Mode. CJ 89 pp. 21-53.

MorrisonA. (2007). Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes. London.

MostG. (1985). The Measures of Praise. Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.

NünlistR. (1998). Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart/Leipzig.

RaceW. (1997). Pindar. Olympian Odes Pythian Odes. Cambridge, MA.

RutherfordI. (1997). Odes and Ends. Closure in Greek Lyric. In: D. RobertsF. Dunn and D. Fowler eds. Classical Closure. Reading the End in Greek and Latin LiteraturePrinceton pp. 43-61.

ScheinS.L. (1987). Unity and Meaning in Pindar’s Sixth Pythian Ode. Mètis 2 pp. 235-247.

SchroederO. (1922). Pindars Pythien. Leipzig.

SlaterW. (1969). Lexicon to Pindar. Berlin.

SmithT. (2017). The Performance of Pindar’s Pythian 6 and its Akragantine Audience. In: H. ReidD. Tanasi and S. Kimbell eds. Politics and Performance in Western Greece. Essays on the Hellenic Heritage of Sicily and Southern ItalySioux City, IA pp. 71-81.

Strauss ClayJ. (1999). Pindar’s Sympotic Epinicia. QUCC 62 pp. 25-34.

SvenbroJ. (1976). La parole et le marbre. Aux origines de la poétique grecque. Lund.

VerityA. (2007). Pindar. The Complete Odes. Oxford.

von Wilamowitz-MoellendorffU. (1922). Pindaros. Berlin.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 4
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0