Utinam Avum Tuum Meminisses! Threats and Allusions in the First Philippic

In: Mnemosyne

Abstract

In sections 34-35 of the First Philippic, Cicero makes a powerful threat against Antony by engaging in allusive role-play that makes dual use of Marcus Antonius orator as an exemplum. Cicero first declares himself Antonius to Antony’s Cinna, thus acknowledging the limitations of rhetoric in the face of violence and indicating that he is prepared to accept a martyr’s role. Second, Cicero invites conflation of himself with Marius/Cinna and Antony to his grandfather Antonius, thereby declaring that Cicero had decided to oppose Antony and work towards Antony’s destruction. This role-play represents not only a powerful warning to Antony, but also a sign of Cicero’s change in attitude towards Antony, an attitudinal change reinforced by Cicero’s wordplay on reversio. The allusive threats in sections 34-35 also indicate that Cicero had decided by no later than 2 September 44, and not with the dissemination of the Second Philippic, that there would be no reconciliation between himself and Antony.

  • van der BlomH. (2010). Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.

  • van der BlomH. (2011). Historical Exempla as Tools of Praise and Blame in Ciceronian Oratory. In: S. Smith and R. Covino eds. Praise and Blame in Roman Republican RhetoricSwansea pp. 49-68.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClarkA.C. ed. (1956). M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Oxford.

  • GnaukR. (1936). Die Bedeutung des Marius und Cato maior für Cicero. Berlin.

  • HabichtC. (1990). Cicero the Politician. Baltimore.

  • HallJ. (2002). The Philippics. In: J. May ed. Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and RhetoricLeiden pp. 273-304.

  • HallJ. (2013). Cicero and Political Crisis. In: C. Steel ed. The Cambridge Companion to CiceroCambridge pp. 215-232.

  • KnightD.W. (1968). The Political Acumen of Cicero After the Death of Caesar. Latomus 27 pp. 157-164.

  • LadońT. (2016). Mark Antony’s Forefathers. Comments on the Role of the Gens Antonia in the Final Period of the Roman Republic. In: D. Slapek and I. Luć eds. Marcus Antonius. History and TraditionLublin pp. 131-146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LaveryG.B. (1971). Cicero’s ‘Philarchia’ and Marius. G&R 18 pp. 133-142.

  • ManuwaldG. (2007). Cicero Philippics 3-9. Berlin.

  • ManuwaldG. (2009). The Function of Praise and Blame in Cicero’s Philippics. In: C. Smith and R. Covino eds. Praise and Blame in Roman Republican RhetoricSwansea pp. 199-214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarcheseR.M. (2014). Speech and Silence in Cicero’s Final Days. CJ 110 pp. 77-98.

  • MitchellT. (1991). Cicero. The Senior Statesman. New Haven.

  • RamseyJ.T. (2001). Did Mark Antony Contemplate an Alliance with His Political Enemies in July 44 BCE? CP 96 pp. 253-268.

  • RamseyJ.T. (2003). Cicero Philippics I-II. Cambridge.

  • RawsonE. (1983). Cicero. A Portrait. London.

  • Shackleton BaileyD.R. (2009). Cicero Philippics 1-6. Cambridge, MA.

  • StevensonT. (2008). Tyrants, Kings, and Fathers in the Philippics. In: T. Stevenson and M. Wilson eds. Cicero’s Philippics. History Rhetoric and IdeologyAuckland pp. 95-113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StevensonT. (2009). Antony as ‘Tyrant’ in Cicero’s First Philippic. Ramus 38 pp. 174-196.

  • StocktonD. (1971). Cicero. A Political Biography. London.

  • UríaJ. (2007). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Ciceronian Invective. In: J. Booth ed. Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and BeyondSwansea pp. 47-70.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UsherS. (2010). Cicero’s First Philippic and the Fall of the Republic. BICS 53 pp. 129-136.

  • WootenC. (1983). Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model. Chapel Hill.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 92 93 8
Full Text Views 9 9 1
PDF Downloads 8 8 1