This article reviews Andreas Willi’s study of the history and prehistory of the Greek and Proto-Indo-European (PIE) verbal system which tries to put the data of one of the ‘classical’ languages of PIE reconstruction back onto the centre stage after much attention has been given to Anatolian (Hittite, etc.) and Tocharian in recent decades. It argues that in the earliest reconstructable phase PIE had ergative alignment and that the switch to nominative-accusative alignment triggered a series of changes leading to the distribution of stem formations found in Greek and other ancient PIE languages (root aorists, reduplicated aorists and presents, thematic aorists and presents, s-aorists and s-futures, etc.). The review tries to show that the study presents a series of thought-provoking and well-argued hypotheses, while with its focus on prehistory its philological analyses tend to rely on a few chosen examples.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Avery, J. (1885). The Unaugmented Verb-Forms of the Rig- and Atharva-Vedas. Journal of the American Oriental Society 11, pp. 326-361.
Bendahman, J. (1993). Der reduplizierte Aorist in den indogermanischen Sprachen. Egelsbach.
Berrettoni, P. (1972). L’uso del perfetto nel greco omerico. Studi e saggi linguistici 12, pp. 25-170.
van Brock, N. (1964). Les thèmes verbaux à redoublement du hittite et le verbe indo-européen. Revue hittite et asianique 22, pp. 119-165.
Bybee, J.L., Perkins, R.D., and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago.
Byrd, A.M. (2015). The Indo-European Syllable. Leiden/Boston.
Cardona, G. (1960). The Indo-European Thematic Aorists. Dissertation, Yale.
Chantraine, P. (2013). Grammaire homérique, Vol. 1: Phonétique et morphologie. Nouvelle édition revue et corrigée par Michael Casevitz. 4th ed. Paris. [1st ed. 1943].
Cowgill, W. (1975). More Evidence for Indo-Hittite. The Tense-Aspect Systems. In: L. Heilmann, ed., Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists, Bologna, pp. 557-570.
Cowgill, W. (1979). Anatolian Hi-Conjugation and Indo-European Perfect. Installment II. In: E. Neu and W. Meid, eds., Hethitisch und Indogermanisch. Vergleichende Studien zur historischen Grammatik und zur dialektgeographischen Stellung der indogermanischen Sprachgruppe Altkleinasiens, Innsbruck, pp. 25-39.
De Decker, F. (2015). The Augment in Homer, with Special Attention to Speech Introductions and Conclusions. München.
De Decker, F. (2016). The Augment Use in Iliad 6. An Evidential Marker? Études Classiques 84, pp. 259-317.
De Lamberterie, C. (1986). Deux isoglosses entre l’arménien et l’indo-iranien. In: M. Leroy and F. Mawet, eds., La place d l’arménien dans les langues indo-européennes, Leuven, pp. 48-61.
Frisk, H. (1960). Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg.
García Ramón, J.L. (2007). Altlatein cortumiō ‘Geländeausschnitt’, idg. *kr̥-tomh1-ó- ‘(Schnitt) schneidend’, contemno ‘schmähe’ und griechisch κέρτοµος ‘schmähend’, κερτοµέω ‘schmähe’. Aevum antiquum 7, pp. 285-298.
Gehring, A. (1891). Index homericus. Leipzig.
Haug, D. (2004). Aristotle’s Kinesis Energeia-Test and the Semantics of the Greek Perfect. Linguistics 42, pp. 387-418.
Haug, D. (2008). Aspectual Oppositions from Proto-Indo-European to Latin. In: F. Josephson and I. Söhrman, eds., Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 61-72.
Heine, B., and Kuteva, T. (2004). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge.
Hoffmann, K. (1970). Das Kategoriensystem des indogermanischen Verbums. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 28, pp. 19-41.
Hopper, P.J., and Thompson, S.A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56 (2), pp. 251-299.
Jacques, G. (2014). Denominal Affixes as Sources of Antipassive Markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138, pp. 1-22.
Jamison, S.W., and Brereton, J.P. (2014). The Rigveda. The Earliest Religious Poetry of India. New York.
Jasanoff, J.H. (2003). Hittite and the Indo-European Verb. Oxford.
Klingenschmitt, G. (1982). Das altarmenische Verbum. Wiesbaden.
Kölligan, D. (2018). Kέκλυθι/-τε. Glotta 94, pp. 203-212.
Kölligan, D. (forthcoming). Scharfe Analysen. Gr. σκεθρός ‘genau’. Glotta.
Kümmel, M. (2000). Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen. Eine Untersuchung der Form und Funktion einer ererbten Kategorie des Verbums und ihrer Weiterentwicklung in den altindoiranischen Sprachen. Wiesbaden.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg.
Lejeune, M. (2005). Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien. 2nd ed. Paris.
Perpillou, J.-L. (1986). De ‘couper’ à ‘insulter’. In: A. Etter and E. Risch, eds., O-o-pe-ro-si. Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, Berlin, pp. 72-84.
Perpillou, J.-L. (1996). Recherches lexicales en grec ancien. Étymologie, analogie, représentations. Louvain.
Rijksbaron, A. (1988). The Discourse Function of the Imperfect. In: A. Rijksbaron, ed., In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner, Amsterdam, pp. 237-254.
Rix, H. (2001). LIV = Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden.
Roth, C.P. (1974). More Homeric ‘Mixed Aorists’. Glotta 52, pp. 1-10.
Schwyzer, E. (1939). Griechische Grammatik, Vol. 1: Allgemeiner Teil, Lautlehre, Wortbildung, Flexion. München.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. In: R.M.W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Linguistic Series, Canberra, pp. 112-171.
Tichy, E. (1983). Onomatopoetische Verbalbildungen des Griechischen. Wien.
Vine, B. (2011). On Dissimilatory r-Loss in Greek. In: T. Krisch and T. Lindner, eds., Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg. Wiesbaden, pp. 1-17.
Wolff, F. (1910). Avesta. Die heiligen Bücher der Parsen. Straßburg.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 673 | 77 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 148 | 14 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 179 | 28 | 3 |
This article reviews Andreas Willi’s study of the history and prehistory of the Greek and Proto-Indo-European (PIE) verbal system which tries to put the data of one of the ‘classical’ languages of PIE reconstruction back onto the centre stage after much attention has been given to Anatolian (Hittite, etc.) and Tocharian in recent decades. It argues that in the earliest reconstructable phase PIE had ergative alignment and that the switch to nominative-accusative alignment triggered a series of changes leading to the distribution of stem formations found in Greek and other ancient PIE languages (root aorists, reduplicated aorists and presents, thematic aorists and presents, s-aorists and s-futures, etc.). The review tries to show that the study presents a series of thought-provoking and well-argued hypotheses, while with its focus on prehistory its philological analyses tend to rely on a few chosen examples.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 673 | 77 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 148 | 14 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 179 | 28 | 3 |