Save

Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5: Demosthenes and Cicero

In: Mnemosyne
Authors:
Casper C. de Jonge Leiden University, Classics Department

Search for other papers by Casper C. de Jonge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Arjan A. Nijk VU University, Classics Department

Search for other papers by Arjan A. Nijk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This article discusses the critical comparison (σύγκρισις) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (µέγεθος), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ὕψος). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus’ conception of the sublime (ὕψος), Cicero’s style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χύσις), which is closely associated with amplification (αὔξησις). Longinus’ discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of ‘great’ literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1005 67 3
Full Text Views 95 11 1
PDF Views & Downloads 154 27 3