In the pamphlet On Salaried Posts in Great Houses Lucian of Samosata analyzes the problem of the impossible relationship between misthos, ‘money’, and paideia, ‘culture’ and ‘teaching’. Money is an indispensable asset for the necessities of life. But starting with Socrates and the Sophists it becomes problematic. In Lucian’s satire the attack is directed at philosophers and the marketing of culture in the Roman Empire at the time of the Second Sophistic.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anderson, G. (1976). Lucian. Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic. Leiden.
Anderson, G. (1982). Lucian: a Sophist’s Sophist, YCS 27, pp. 61-92.
Anderson, G. (1989). The pepaideumenos in Action. Sophists and their Outlook in the Early Empire. ANRW II 33, pp. 79-208.
Anderson, G. (2009). It’s How You Tell Them. Some Aspects of Lucian’s Anecdotes. In: A.N. Bartley, ed., Lucian for our Times, Newcastle 2009, pp. 3-10.
Baldwin, B. (1961). Lucian as Social Satirist, CQ 11, pp. 199-208.
Bauman, Z. (2016). Stranger at Our Door. Cambridge.
Bauman, Z. (2017). Retrotopia. Cambridge.
Beard, M. (2014). Laughter in Ancient Rome. On Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.
Bompaire, J. (1958). Lucien écrivain. Imitation et création. Paris.
Bonazzi, M. (2016). I Sofisti. In: M. Bonazzi, ed., Storia della filosofia antica, Vol. 1: Dalle origini a Socrate, Roma, pp. 195-214.
Bonazzi, M. (2017). Atene, la città inquieta. Torino.
Bragato, F. (2017). Lo spettacolo del corpo secondo il Rhetorum Praeceptor. In: A. Camerotto and S. Maso, eds., La satira del successo. La spettacolarizzazione della cultura nel mondo antico (tra retorica, filosofia, religione e potere), Milano/Udine, pp. 359-374.
Brandão, J.L. (2014). Quem somos nós. Qual é o Império Romano de Luciano? In: F. Faversani and F. Duarte Joly, eds., As formas do Império Romano, Mariana, pp. 63-74.
Branham, R.B. (1989). Unruly Eloquence. Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, MA/London.
Camerotto, A. (2014). Gli occhi e la lingua della satira. Studi sull’eroe satirico in Luciano di Samosata. Milano/Udine.
Camerotto, A. (2017). Il problema del successo e la civiltà dello spettacolo al tempo della Seconda Sofistica. In: A. Camerotto and S. Maso, eds., La satira del successo. La spettacolarizzazione della cultura nel mondo antico (tra retorica, filosofia, religione e potere), Milano/Udine, pp. 477-502.
Camerotto, A. (2020). Luciano di Samosata. Menippo o la negromanzia. Milano/Udine.
Capra, A. (2018). Aristophanes’ Iconic Socrates. In: A. Stavru and C. Moore, eds., Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, Leiden/Boston, pp. 64-83.
Condello, F. (2003). Sisifo, la ricchezza, la morte. Osservazioni e ipotesi sui vv. 699-730 dei Theognidea. Lexis 21, pp. 117-127.
Cozzo, A. (1985). Lavoro ed arricchimento negli Erga di Esiodo. Studi Storici 26, pp. 373-388.
Di Branco, M. (2006). La città dei filosofi. Storia di Atene da Marco Aurelio a Giustiniano. Firenze.
Dorion, L.-A. (2016). La frugalité du Socrate de Xénophon. Gaia 19, pp. 307-318.
Dubel, S. (1994). Dialogue et autoportrait. Les masques de Lucien. In: A. Billault, ed., Lucien de Samosate, Lyon, pp. 19-26.
Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G., and Ribbat, E., eds. (2001). Lukian. Die Lügenfreunde oder der Ungläubige. Darmstadt.
Fields, D. (2021). Frankness, Greek Culture, and the Roman Empire. London/New York.
Free, A. (2015). Geschichtsschreibung als Paideia. Lukians Schrift ‚Wie man Geschichte schreiben soll‘ in der Bildungskultur des 2. Jhs. n. Chr. München.
Gassino, I. (2002). Voir et savoir. Les difficultés de la connaissance chez Lucien. In: L. Villard, ed., Couleurs et vision dans l’Antiquité classique, Rouen, pp. 167-177.
Gleason, M.W. (1995). Making Men. Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.
Gómez, P. (2007). Luciano y la escuela. In: J.A. Fernández Delgado, F. Pordomingo, and A. Stramaglia, eds., Escuela y literatura en Grecia antigua. Actas del Simposio internacional, Universidad de Salamanca, 17-19 noviembre de 2004, Cassino, pp. 485-496.
Hafner, M. (2017a). Lukians Schrift ‚Das traurige Los der Gelehrten‛. Einführung und Kommentar zu De mercede conductis potentium familiaribus, lib. 36. Stuttgart.
Hafner, M. (2017b). Lukians Apologie. Tübingen.
Hall, J.A. (1981). Lucian’s Satire. New York.
Halliwell, F.S. (2008). Greek Laughter. A Study in Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge/New York.
Harris, W.V. (1991). Lettura e istruzione nel mondo antico. Roma/Bari [transl. of: Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA 1989].
Homeyer, H. (1965). Lukian, Wie man Geschichte schreiben soll. München.
Iannucci, A. (2009). Da Samosata a Oxford. Il Sogno di Luciano (e Thomas Hardy) tra biografia, finzione letteraria e parodia. Annali Online di Ferrara—Lettere 2, pp. 99-118.
Iannucci, A. (2011). Il prezzo dei filosofi. Griselda online 11, pp. 1-16.
Imperio, O. (1998). La figura dell’intellettuale nella commedia greca. In: A.M. Belardinelli, O. Imperio, G. Mastromarco, M. Pellegrino, and P. Totaro, eds., Tessere. Frammenti della commedia greca. Studi e commenti, Bari, pp. 43-130.
Jones, C.P. (1986). Culture and Society in Lucian. Cambridge, MA.
Konstan, D. (2012). The Two Faces of Parrhēsia. Free Speech and Self-Expression in Ancient Greece. Antichthon 46, pp. 1-13.
Kuin, I. (2019). Sulla and the Philosophers. The Cultural History of the Sack of Athens. In: A. Eckert and A. Thein, eds., Sulla. Politics and Reception, Berlin, pp. 143-157.
Lauwers, J. (2012). Reading Books, Talking Culture. The Performance of Paideia in Imperial Greek Literature. In: E. Minchin, ed., Orality, Literacy and Performance in the Ancient World, Leiden/Boston, pp. 227-244.
Marquis, É. (2017). Lucien, Œuvres: Opuscules 55-77. Paris.
Mestre, F. (2012-2013). Lucien, les philosophes et les philosophies. Ítaca. Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica 28-29, pp. 63-82.
Moore, C. (2020). Calling Philosophers Names. On the Origin of a Discipline. Princeton.
Natali, C. (2001). Socrate dans l’économique de Xénophon. In: J.-B. Gourinat, ed., Socrate et les Socratiques, Paris, pp. 263-288.
Nesselrath, H.-G. (2009). A Tale of Two Cities—Lucian on Athens and Rome. In: A. Bartley, ed., A Lucian for Our Times, Cambridge, pp. 121-135.
Ní Mheallaigh, K.N. (2010). The Game of the Name. Onymity and the Contract of Reading in Lucian. In: F. Mestre and P. Gómez, eds., Lucian of Samosata. Greek Writer and Roman Citizen, Barcelona, pp. 121-132.
Noussia, M. (2016). Redefining Use, Expenditure and Exchange of Private Wealth. The Socratic Model, Antisthenes and the Cynics. Gaia 19, pp. 319-333.
Pass, D.B. (2016). Buying Books and Choosing Lives. From Agora to Acropolis in Lucian’s Transformation of Plato’s Emporium of Politics. AJPh 137, pp. 625-654.
Pavese, C.O. (1966). Χρήµατα, χρήµατ᾽ ἀνήρ ed il motivo della liberalità nella seconda Istmica di Pindaro. QUCC 2, pp. 103-112.
Peretti, A. (1946). Luciano, un intellettuale greco contro Roma. Firenze.
Pontani, F. (2012). Lo spirito della liturgia. In: A. Camerotto and F. Pontani, eds., Classici contro. Milano/Udine, pp. 81-96.
Privitera, G.A. (1982). Pindaro, Le Istmiche. Milano.
Reardon, B.P. (1971). Courants littéraires grecs des IIème et IIIème siècles apres J.-C. Paris.
Saïd, S. (1993). Le ‘je’ de Lucien. In: M.F. Baslez, Ph. Hoffmann, and L. Pernot, eds., L’invention de l’autobiographie d’Hésiode à Saint Augustin, Paris, pp. 253-270.
Schaps, D.M. (2003). Socrates and the Socratics. When Wealth Became a Problem. CW 96, pp. 131-157.
Schmitz, T.A. (2017). Professionals of Paideia? The Sophists as Performers. In: D.S. Richter and W.A. Johnson, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic, Oxford/New York, pp. 169-180.
Solitario, M. (2020). L’Ermotimo di Luciano. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Berlin/Boston.
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1986). Crime and Punishment. Tityos, Tantalos and Sisyphos in Odyssey 11. BICS 33, pp. 37-58.
Swain, S. (1996). Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50-250. Oxford.
Tedeschi, G. (2003-2004). Il valore della ricchezza. Incontri triestini di filologia classica 3, pp. 21-55.
Tedeschi, G. (2017). Ricchezza e povertà nella letteratura dell’antica Grecia. Alcune riflessioni. AION 39, pp. 31-70.
Tomassi, G. (2011). Luciano di Samosata, Timone o il misantropo. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Berlin/New York.
Tomassi, G. (2020). Luciano di Samosata, La nave o le preghiere. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Berlin/Boston.
Whitmarsh, T. (2001). Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.
Whitmarsh, T. (2005). The Second Sophistic. Oxford.
Zanker, P. (1995). The Mask of Sokrates. The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley/Los Angeles.
Zweimüller, S. (2008). Lukian. “Rhetorum praeceptor”. Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Göttingen.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3572 | 76 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 31 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 22 | 4 |
In the pamphlet On Salaried Posts in Great Houses Lucian of Samosata analyzes the problem of the impossible relationship between misthos, ‘money’, and paideia, ‘culture’ and ‘teaching’. Money is an indispensable asset for the necessities of life. But starting with Socrates and the Sophists it becomes problematic. In Lucian’s satire the attack is directed at philosophers and the marketing of culture in the Roman Empire at the time of the Second Sophistic.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3572 | 76 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 31 | 12 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 22 | 4 |