Seneca’s masterful application of metaphors often illuminates some Stoic technical terminology in contexts, which render them meaningful and familiar to his Roman readers. In this paper I argue that in certain instances, these metaphors are also used to organize whole systems of concepts that refer to an essential theoretical component of Seneca’s philosophy. By studying the literary and philosophical context of these metaphors, I reconstruct Seneca’s requirement for moral self-improvement in his Epistles and propose that his conception of conscientia or ‘moral conscience’—a notion scattered throughout his writings but which, as the examination of his systematic metaphors will prove, has a consistent, identical function everywhere it appears—points to some novel rational characteristics of the philosopher’s conception of the self.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989). Sapientiae facies. Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (2015). Seneca’s Images and Metaphors. In: S. Bartsch and A. Schiesaro, eds., pp. 150-160.
Asmis, E., Bartsch, S., and Nussbaum, M., eds. (2015). Letters on Ethics. To Lucilius (The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca). Chicago.
Bartsch, S. (2006). The Mirror of the Self. Sexuality, Self-knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.
Bartsch, S. (2009). Senecan Metaphor and Stoic Self-Instruction. In: S. Bartsch and D. Wray, eds., pp. 188-220.
Bartsch, S. (2015). Senecan Selves. In: S. Bartsch and A. Schiesaro, eds., pp. 187-198.
Bartsch, S., and Schiesaro, A., eds. (2015). The Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge.
Bartsch, S. and Wray, D., eds. (2009). Seneca and the Self. Cambridge.
Cairns, D. (2017). Mind, Metaphor and Emotion in Euripides’ Hippolytus and Seneca’s Phaedra. In: D. Cairns and D.P. Nelis, eds., Seneca’s Tragic Passions, Brescia, pp. 246-267.
Cancik, H. (1967). Untersuchungen zu Senecas Epistulae morales. Meisenheim am Glan.
Coleman, R. (1974). The Artful Moralist. A Study of Seneca’s Epistolary Style. CQ 24, pp. 276-289.
Corcilius, K. (2015). Faculties in Ancient Philosophy. In: D. Perler, ed., The Faculties. A History, Oxford, pp. 19-58.
Davis, M. (2010). A Commentary on Seneca’s Epistulae morales Book IV (Epistles 30-41), PhD Dissertation, University of Auckland.
Edwards, C. (1997). Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters. G&R 44, pp. 23-38 [repr. in: J.G. Fitch, ed., Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Seneca, Oxford 2008, pp. 84-101].
Foucault, M. (1997). Self-Writing. In: P. Rabinow, ed., Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, transl. by R. Hurley et al., New York, pp. 207-222.
Frankfurt, H.G. (1971). Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. JPh 68, pp. 5-20 [repr. in: id., The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge 1988, pp. 11-25].
Gunderson, E. (2015). The Sublime Seneca. Ethics, Literature, Metaphysics. Cambridge.
Hachmann, E. (1995). Die Führung des Lesers in Senecas Epistulae morales. Münster.
Henderson, J. (2004). Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters. Places to Dwell. Cambridge.
Inwood, B. (2005). Reading Seneca. Oxford.
Konstan, D. (2019). Lucretius and the Conscience of an Epicurean. Politeia 1.2, pp. 68-80.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge.
Lakoff, G., and Johnsen, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.
Long, A.A. (2009). Seneca on the Self. Why Now? In: S. Bartsch and D. Wray, eds., pp. 20-38.
Maurach, G. (1970). Der Bau von Senecas Epistulae morales. Heidelberg.
Nawar, T. (2020). The Stoic Theory of the Soul. In: K. Arenson, The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, Abingdon/New York, pp. 148-159.
Newman, J.R. (1989). Cotidie meditare. Theory and Practice of the meditatio in Imperial Stoicism. ANRW II 36, pp. 1473-1517.
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005). The Roman Stoics. Self, Responsibility and Affection. Chicago.
Reydams-Schils, G. (2010). Seneca’s Platonism. The Soul and Its Divine Origin. In: A. Nightingale and D.N. Sedley, eds., Ancient Models of Mind. Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge, pp. 196-215.
Reynolds, L.D. (1965). L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium epistulae morales. Oxford.
Reynolds, L.D. (1977). L. Annaei Senecae Dialogorum libri duodecim. Oxford.
Richardson-Hay, C. (2006). First Lessons. Book 1 of Seneca’s Epistulae morales. A Commentary. Bern/Berlin/Bruxelles/Frankfurt am Main/New York/Oxford/Wien.
Riggsby, A. (2015). Tyrants, Fire and Dangerous Things. In: G.D. Williams and K. Volk, eds., pp. 111-128.
Roller, M. (2001). Constructing Autocracy. Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.
Roller, M. (2016). Precept(or) and Example in Seneca. In: G.D. Williams and K. Volk, eds., pp. 129-156.
Rosch, E., and Lloyd, B., eds. (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale.
Rosenmeyer, T.G. (1989). Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology. Berkeley.
Setaioli, A. (2007). Seneca and the Divine. Stoic Tradition and Personal Developments. IJCT 13, pp. 333-368.
Smith, C.S. (1910). Metaphor and Comparison in the Epistulae ad Lucilium of L. Annaeus Seneca. Berkeley/Los Angeles.
Sorabji, R. (2000). Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford.
Sorabji, R. (2015). Moral Conscience Through the Ages. Fifth Century bce to the Present. Oxford.
Vogt, K. (2020). Seneca. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/seneca/.
Vottero, D. (1998). Lucio Anneo Seneca, I frammenti. Bologna.
Williams, G.D., and Volk, K., eds. Roman Reflections. Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 504 | 88 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 323 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 678 | 30 | 0 |
Seneca’s masterful application of metaphors often illuminates some Stoic technical terminology in contexts, which render them meaningful and familiar to his Roman readers. In this paper I argue that in certain instances, these metaphors are also used to organize whole systems of concepts that refer to an essential theoretical component of Seneca’s philosophy. By studying the literary and philosophical context of these metaphors, I reconstruct Seneca’s requirement for moral self-improvement in his Epistles and propose that his conception of conscientia or ‘moral conscience’—a notion scattered throughout his writings but which, as the examination of his systematic metaphors will prove, has a consistent, identical function everywhere it appears—points to some novel rational characteristics of the philosopher’s conception of the self.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 504 | 88 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 323 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 678 | 30 | 0 |