Save

Energeia in the Magna Moralia

A New Case for Late Authorship

In: Mnemosyne
Author:
Daniel Wolt Bilkent University, Dept. of Philosophy Ankara Turkey

Search for other papers by Daniel Wolt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-3789
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

There is no clear consensus among scholars about the authenticity of the Magna Moralia. Here I present a new case for thinking that the work was composed by a later Peripatetic, and is not, either directly or indirectly, the work of Aristotle. My argument rests on an analysis of the author’s usage of ἐνέργεια, which is a fruitful way to investigate the date of the work: the term was apparently coined by Aristotle but in later antiquity came to be used in ways inconsistent with Aristotle’s own usage. I argue that in several passages from the Magna Moralia the term is used in this distinctively late sense and that it is not plausible to think that this innovation could have occured in Aristotle’s own lifetime or shortly thereafter.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 274 170 23
Full Text Views 77 55 0
PDF Views & Downloads 165 114 0