Save

A Hierarchical Modular Architecture for Embodied Cognition

In: Multisensory Research
Authors:
Dana H. Ballard 1Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Search for other papers by Dana H. Ballard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dmitry Kit 1Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Search for other papers by Dmitry Kit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Constantin A. Rothkopf 2Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Search for other papers by Constantin A. Rothkopf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Brian Sullivan 3Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Search for other papers by Brian Sullivan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Cognition can appear complex owing to the fact that the brain is capable of an enormous repertoire of behaviors. However, this complexity can be greatly reduced when constraints of time and space are taken into account. The brain is constrained by the body to limit its goal-directed behaviors to just a few independent tasks over the scale of 1–2 min, and can pursue only a very small number of independent agendas. These limitations have been characterized from a number of different vantage points such as attention, working memory and dual task performance. It may be possible that the disparate perspectives of all these methodologies can be unified if behaviors can be seen as modular and hierarchically organized. From this vantage point, cognition can be seen as having a central problem of scheduling behaviors to achieve short term goals. Thus dual-task paradigms can be seen as studying the concurrent management of simultaneous, competing agendas. Attention can be seen as focusing on the decision as to whether to interrupt the current agenda or persevere. Working memory can be seen as the bookkeeping necessary to manage the state of the current active agenda items.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 650 120 4
Full Text Views 113 20 1
PDF Views & Downloads 67 20 0