Research detailing multisensory integration (MSI) processes in aging and their association with clinically relevant outcomes is virtually non-existent. To our knowledge, the relationship between MSI and balance has not been well-established in aging. Given known alterations in unisensory processing with increasing age, the aims of the current study were to determine differential behavioral patterns of MSI in aging and investigate whether MSI was significantly associated with balance and fall-risk. Seventy healthy older adults ( years; 58% female) participated in the current study. Participants were instructed to make speeded responses to visual, somatosensory, and visual-somatosensory (VS) stimuli. Based on reaction times (RTs) to all stimuli, participants were classified into one of two groups (MSI or NO MSI), depending on their MSI RT benefit. Static balance was assessed using mean unipedal stance time. Overall, results revealed that RTs to VS stimuli were significantly shorter than those elicited to constituent unisensory conditions. Further, the current experimental design afforded differential patterns of multisensory processing, with 75% of the elderly sample demonstrating multisensory enhancements. Interestingly, 25% of older adults did not demonstrate multisensory RT facilitation; a finding that was attributed to extremely fast RTs overall and specifically in response to somatosensory inputs. Individuals in the NO MSI group maintained significantly better unipedal stance times and reported less falls, compared to elders in the MSI group. This study reveals the existence of differential patterns of multisensory processing in aging, while describing the clinical translational value of MSI enhancements in predicting balance and falls risk.
BaltesP. B.LindenbergerU. (1997).
Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?Psychol. Aging1212–21.
CascioC. J.Foss-FeigJ. H.BurnetteC. P.HeacockJ. L.CosbyA. A. (2012).
The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioceptionAutism16406–419.
DuffK.Humphreys ClarkJ. D.O’BryantS. E.MoldJ. W.SchifferR. B.SutkerP. B. (2008).
Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease: sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powersArch. Clin. Neuropsychol.23603–612.
EngelA. K.SenkowskiD.SchneiderT. R. (2012).
Multisensory integration through neural coherence in:
The Neural Bases of Multisensory ProcessesMurrayM. M.WallaceM. T. (Eds) Ch. 7. CRC PressBoca Raton, FL, USA.
FoxeJ. J.WylieG. R.MartinezA.SchroederC. E.JavittD. C.GuilfoyleD.RitterW.MurrayM. M. (2002).
Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI studyJ. Neurophysiol.88540–543.
Intraindividual variability in executive functions but not speed of processing or conflict resolution predicts performance differences in gait speed in older adultsJ. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.
LimH. K.KenistonL. P.ShinJ. H.AllmanB. L.MeredithM. A.CiosK. J. (2011).
Connectional parameters determine multisensory processing in a spiking network model of multisensory convergenceExp. Brain Res.213329–339.
MeredithM. A.AllmanB. L.KenistonL. P.ClemoH. R. (2012).
Are bimodal neurons the same throughout the brain? in:
The Neural Bases of Multisensory ProcessesCh. 4MurrayM. M.WallaceM. T. (Eds). CRC PressBoca Raton, FL, USA.
MolholmS.RitterW.MurrayM. M.JavittD. C.SchroederC. E.FoxeJ. J. (2002).
Multisensory auditory–visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping studyBrain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.14115–128.
MozolicJ. L.HugenschmidtC. E.PeifferA. M.LaurientiP. J. (2012).
Multisensory integration and aging in:
The Neural Bases of Multisensory ProcessesMurrayM. M.WallaceM. T. (Eds) Ch. 20. CRC PressBoca Raton, FL, USA.
MurrayM. M.MolholmS.MichelC. M.HeslenfeldD. J.RitterW.JavittD. C.SchroederC. E.FoxeJ. J. (2005).
Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignmentCereb. Cortex15963–974.
RussoN.FoxeJ. J.BrandweinA. B.AltschulerT.GomesH.MolholmS. (2010).
Multisensory processing in children with autism: high-density electrical mapping of auditory-somatosensory integrationAutism Res.3253–267.
SchroederC. E.FoxeJ. J. (2004).
Multisensory convergence in early cortical processing in:
The Handbook of Multisensory ProcessesCalvertG. A.SpenceC.SteinB. E. (Eds) pp.
295–309. MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.
SenkowskiD.MolholmS.Gomez-RamirezM.FoxeJ. J. (2006).
Oscillatory beta activity predicts response speed during a multisensory audiovisual reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping studyCereb. Cortex161556–1565.
SenkowskiD.Saint-AmourD.GruberT.FoxeJ. J. (2008).
Look who’s talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditionsNeuroimage43379–387.
StapletonJ.SettiA.DohenyE. P.KennyR. A.NewellF. N. (2014).
A standing posture is associated with increased susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in fall-prone older adultsExp. Brain Res.232423–434.
WallaceM. T. (2012).
The impact of multisensory alterations in human developmental disabilities and disease: the tip of the iceberg? in:
The New Handbook of Multisensory ProcessingSteinB. E. (Ed.). MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.
Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentialsBrain127351–362.