This review has the purpose of retracing the work of Professor Bernard Sabel and his group over the last 2–3 decades, in order to understand how they achieved formulation of the ‘Residual Vision Activation Theory’. The methodology proposed is described, from the first studies in 1995 with High Resolution Perimetry requiring a six-months training period, to the new technologies, such as repetitive transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation, that require ten days of training. Vision restoration therapy has shown improvement in visual responses irrespective of age at the training, lesion aetiology and site of lesion. The hypothesis that visual training may induce network plasticity, improving neuronal networks in cortical and subcortical areas of both hemispheres, appears to be confirmed by recent studies including observation of the cerebral activity by fMRI and EEG. However, the results are quite variable and the mechanisms that influence cerebral activity are still unclear. The residual vision activation theory has been much criticized, both for its methodology and analysis of the results, but it gave a new impulse to the research in this area, stimulating more studies on induced cerebral plasticity.
AldermanN.FryR. K.YoungsonH. A. (1995).
Improvement of self-monitoring skills, reduction of behavior disturbance and dysexecutive syndrome: comparison of response cost and a new program of self-monitoring trainingNeuropsychol. Rehabil.5193–221.
BolaM.GallC.SabelB. A. (2013b).
The second face of blindness: processing speed deficits in the intact visual field after pre- and post-chiasmatic lesionsPLoS ONE8e63700. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0063700.
The behavioral management of neglect in:
Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental StudiesRobertsonI. H.MarshallJ. C. (Eds) pp.
293–310. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ, USA.
FedorovA.JobkeS.BersnevV.ChibisovaA.ChibisovaY.GallC.SabelB. A. (2011).
Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: a clinical observational studyBrain Stimul.4189–201.
GallC.MüllerI.KaufmannC.SabelB. A. (2006). Effects of long-term use of Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) and stability of visual field improvements >3 years in: 67th AAPM&R Annual Assembly Nov. 9–12 Honolulu HI USA.
GallC.MuellerI.GudlinJ.LindigA.SchlueterD.JobkeS.FrankeG. H.SabelB. A. (2008a).
Vision- and health-related quality of life before and after vision restoration training in cerebrally damaged patientsRestor. Neurol. Neurosci.26341–353.
GallC.MuellerI.KaufmannC.FrankeG. H.SabelB. A. (2008b).
Visual field defects after cerebral lesions from the patient’s perspective: health- and vision-related quality of life assesseb by SF-36 and NEI-VFQNervenarzt79185–194.
GallC.SgorzalyS.SchmidtS.BrandtS.FedorovA.SabelB. A. (2011).
Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathyBrain Stimul.4175–188.
JobkeS.KastenE.SabelB. A. (2009).
Vision restoration through extrastriate stimulation in patients with visual field defects: a double-blind and randomized experimental studyNeurorehabil. Neural Repair23246–255.
KastenE.PoggelD. A.SabelB. A. (2000).
Computer-based training of stimulus detection improves color and simple pattern recognition in the defective field of hemianopic subjectsJ. Cogn. Neurosci.121001–1012.
Rehabilitation of homonymous scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation trainingRestor. Neurol. Neurosci.4245–254.
MarshallR. S.FerreraJ. J.BarnesA.ZhangX.O’BrienK. A.ChmayssaniM.HirschJ.LazarR. M. (2008).
Brain activity associated with stimulation therapy of the visual borderzone in hemianopic stroke patientsNeurorehabil. Neural Repair22136–144.
MeyerB. U.DiehlR.SteinmetzH.BrittonT. C.BeneckeR. (1991).
Magnetic stimuli applied over motor cortex and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movementsElectroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl.43121–134.
PoggelD. A.MuellerI.KastenE.SabelB. A. (2008).
Multifactorial predictors and outcome variables of vision restoration training in patients with post-geniculate visual field lossRest. Neurol. Neuruosci.26321–339.
PrilloffS.NoblejasM. I.ChedhommeV.SabelB. A. (2007).
Two faces of calcium activation after optic nerve trauma: live or death of retinal ganglion cells in vivo dependes on calcium dynamicsEur. J. Neurosci.253339–3346.
ReinhardJ.SchreiberA.SchieferU.KastenE.SabelB. A.KenkelS.VontheinR.Trauzettel-KlosinskiS. (2005).
Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled studyBr. J. Ophthalmol.8930–35.
ZihlJ. (1980). Untersuchung von Sehfunktionen bei Patientenmiteiner Schädigung der zentralenvisuellen Systems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Restitution dieser Funktionen Habilitationsschrift München Germany.