Understanding the Correspondences: Introduction to the Special Issue on Crossmodal Correspondences

In: Multisensory Research

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BienN.ten OeverS.GoebelR.SackA. T. (2012). The sound of size: crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: a combined TMS, EEG, and psychophysics studyNeuroImage 59663672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremnerA.CaparosS.DavidoffJ.de FockertJ.LinnellK.SpenceC. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to WesternersCognition 126165172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarnevaleM. J.HarrisL. R. (2016). Which direction is up for a high pitch? Multisens. Res. 29113132.

  • CytowicR. E. (1993). The Man Who Tasted Shapes. G. P. Putnam’s SonsNew York, NY, USA.

  • DeroyO.SpenceC. (2013a). Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so)Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20643664.

  • DeroyO.SpenceC. (2013b). Are we all born synaesthetic? Examining the neonatal synaesthesia hypothesisNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 3712401253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeroyO.SpenceC. (in press). Lessons of synaesthesia for consciousness: learning from the exception, rather than the generalNeuropsychologia. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeroyO.SpenceC. (2016). Crossmodal correspondences: four challengesMultisens. Res. 292848.

  • DeroyO.CrisinelA.-S.SpenceC. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapesPsychon. Bull Rev. 20878896.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeroyO.FasielloI.HaywardV.AuvrayM. (in press). Differentiated audio-tactile correspondences in sighted and blind individualsJ. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DingemanseM. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophonesLang. Linguist. Compass 6654672.

  • EtziR.SpenceC.ZampiniM.GallaceA. (2016). When sandpaper is ‘kiki’ and satin is ‘bouba’: an exploration of the associations between words, emotional states, and the tactile attributes of everyday materialsMultisens. Res. 29133155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansK. K.TreismanA. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory featuresJ. Vis. 106. DOI:10.1167/10.1.6.

  • JraissatiY.SlobodenyukN.KansoA.GhanemL.ElhajjI. (2016). Haptic and tactile adjectives are consistently mapped onto color spaceMultisens. Res. 29253278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KnöferleK. M.SpenceC. (2012). Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastesPsychon. Bull. Rev. 199921006.

  • KnöferleK. M.WoodsA.KäpplerF.SpenceC. (2015). That sounds sweet: using crossmodal correspondences to communicate gustatory attributesPsychol. Marketing 32107120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KöhlerW. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. Liveright PublicationNew York, NY, USA.

  • KöhlerW. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: an Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Liveright PublicationNew York, NY, USA.

  • LewkowiczD. J.TurkewitzG. (1980). Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: auditory–visual intensity matchingDev. Psychol. 16597607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LudwigV. U.AdachiI.MatzuzawaT. (2011). Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humansProc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1082066120665.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarksL. (1978). The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. Academic PressNew York, NY, USA.

  • MarksL. E. (1996). On perceptual metaphorsMetaphor. Symb. Act. 113966.

  • MarksL. E. (2004). Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification, in: Handbook of Multisensory ProcessesCalvertG. A.SpenceC.SteinB. E. (Eds), pp.  85105. MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarksL. E.HammealR. J.BornsteinM. H. (1987). Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphorMonogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 52(215), 1102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NavaE.GrassiM.TuratiC. (2016). Audio-visual, visuo-tactile and audio-tactile correspondences in preschoolersMultisens. Res. 2993111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois PressUrbana, IL, USA.

  • PalmerS. E.SchlossK. B.XuZ.Prado-LeónL. R. (2013). Music-color associations are mediated by emotionProc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11088368841.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PalmerS. E.LangloisT. S.SchlossK. B. (2016). Music-to-color associations of single-line piano melodies in non-synesthetesMultisens. Res. 29157193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PariseC. V. (2016). Crossmodal correspondences: standing issues and experimental guidelinesMultisens. Res. 29728.

  • PariseC. V.SpenceC. (2013). Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population, in: Oxford Handbook of SynaesthesiaSimnerJ.HubbardE. M. (Eds), pp.  790815. Oxford University PressOxford, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PariseC. V.KnorreK.ErnstM. O. (2014). Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearingProc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11161046108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PrattC. C. (1930). The spatial character of high and low tonesJ. Exp. Psychol. 13278285.

  • RatcliffeV. F.TaylorA. M.RebyD. (2016). Cross-modal correspondences in non-human mammal communicationMultisens. Res. 294991.

  • SadaghianiS.MaierJ. X.NoppeneyU. (2009). Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processingJ. Neurosci. 2964906499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SapirE. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolismJ. Exp. Psychol. 12225239.

  • SimnerJ.HubbardE. M. (Eds) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford University PressOxford, UK.

  • SniderJ. G.OsgoodC. E. (1969). Semantic Differential Technique: a Sourcebook. Aldine PublishingChicago, IL, USA.

  • SpenceC. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial reviewAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 73125.

  • SpenceC. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolismJ. Consum. Psychol. 223754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SpenceC. (2014). Assessing the influence of shape and sound symbolism on the consumer’s response to chocolateNew Food 175962.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SpenceC.PariseC. V. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of crossmodal correspondencesi-Perception 3410412.

  • StekelenburgJ. J.KeetelsM. (in press). The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effectExp. Brain Res. DOI:10.1007/s00221-015-4363-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StumpfK. (1883). Tonpsychologie [Psychology of Tones]. S. HirzelLeipzig, Germany.

  • Van LeeuwenT. M.DingemanseM.TodilN.AgameyaA.MajidA. (2016). Non-random associations of graphemes with colors in ArabicMultisens. Res. 29223252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VelascoC.WoodsA. T.LiuJ.SpenceC. (2016). Assessing the role of taste intensity and hedonics in taste-shape correspondencesMultisens. Res. 29209221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WagnerK.DobkinsK. R. (2011). Synaesthetic associations decrease during infancyPsychol. Sci. 2210671072.

  • WagnerS.WinnerE.CicchettiD.GardnerH. (1981). “Metaphorical” mapping in human infantsChild Dev. 52728731.

  • WalkerP.BremnerJ. G.MasonU.SpringJ.MattockK.SlaterA.JohnsonS. P. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synesthetic cross-modality correspondencesPsychol. Sci. 212125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WalkerP.BremnerJ. G.MasonU.SpringJ.MattockK.SlaterA.JohnsonS. P. (2014). Preverbal infants are sensitive to cross-sensory correspondences: much ado about the null results of Lewkowicz and Minar (2014)Psychol. Sci. 25835836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangQ. (J.)SpenceC. (2016). ‘Striking a sour note’: assessing the influence of consonant and dissonant music on taste perceptionMultisens. Res. 29195208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WoodsA. T.SpenceC.ButcherN.DeroyO. (2013). Fast lemons and sour boulders: testing the semantic hypothesis of crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodologyi-Perception 4365369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 227 137 11
Full Text Views 188 15 6
PDF Downloads 16 4 1