Haptic and Tactile Adjectives Are Consistently Mapped onto Color Space

in Multisensory Research
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Cross-modal associations refer to non-arbitrary associations of features across sensory modalities. Such associations have been observed between many different sensory features. One association that has rarely been studied so far is between touch and color. In this study, participants were asked to match tactile and haptic adjectives to color samples shown individually on a screen. They could select one to 11 tactile and haptic terms, presented in 11 pairs of opposed adjectives. The results showed a regular pattern in the way tactile and haptic terms were matched to color. Our results further revealed that the colors to which tactile and haptic terms were matched did not fall within the boundaries of color lexical categories, suggesting that the associations were not based on lexicon — despite the frequent occurrence of linguistic expressions such as ‘soft pink’, not all colors called ‘pink’ were matched to ‘soft’. In contrast with one recent study, the distribution of tactile and haptic terms across the Munsell array suggests that along with brightness and chroma, hue was also relevant to participants’ responses. Specifically in the case of hue, several opposed adjectives were relatively well matched to opposed colors, along the orthogonal Yellow/Blue and Red/Green axes, which are suggested to structure the space of hue experience. Possible accounts of these results are considered.

Multisensory Research

A Journal of Scientific Research on All Aspects of Multisensory Processing

Sections

References

Bergmann TiestW. M.KappersA. M. I. (2006). Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility, Acta Psychol. 121, 120.

BerlinB.KayP. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. CLSI Publications, Stanford, CA, USA.

BremnerA.CaparosS.DavidoffJ.de FockertJ.LinnellK.SpenceC. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners, Cognition 126, 165172.

CookR.KayP.RegierT. (2005). The World Color Survey database: history and use, in: Handbook of Categorization in the Cognitive Sciences, CohenH.LefebvreC. (Eds), pp.  224242. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

CrisinelA.-S.SpenceC. (2010). As bitter as a trombone: synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetes between tastes/flavors and musical notes, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 19942002.

CrisinelA.-S.CosserS.KingS.JonesR.PetrieJ.SpenceC. (2012). A bittersweet symphony: systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic properties of the soundtrack playing in the background, Food Qual. Pref. 24, 201204.

DavidoffJ.DaviesI.RobersonD. (1999). Colour categories in a stone-age tribe, Nature 398, 203204.

De ValoisR. L.AbramovI.JacobsG. H. (1966). Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 966977.

De ValoisR. L.De ValoisK. K.MahonL. E. (2000). Contribution of S opponent cells to color appearance, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 512517.

DeroyO.SpenceC. (in press). Crossmodal correspondences: four challenges, Multisens. Res. DOI:10.1163/22134808-00002488.

DeroyO.CrisinelA.-S.SpenceC. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes, Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 20, 878896.

GallaceA.SpenceC. (2006). Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size, Percept. Psychophys. 68, 11911203.

Google books Ngram Viewer (n.d.). Retrieved from https://books.google.com/ngrams/.

GuestS.DessirierJ.-M.MehrabyanA.McGloneF.EssickG.GeschedierG.FontanaA.XiongR.AckerleyR.BlotK. (2011). Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 531550.

HeringE. (1964). Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense. Harvard Univeristy Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

HoH. N.Van DoornG. H.KawabeT.WatanabeJ.SpenceC. (2014). Colour–temperature correspondences: when reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour, PLoS One 9, e91854. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091854.

HollinsM.FaldowskiR.RaoS.YoungF. (1993). Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: a multidimensional scaling analysis, Percept. Psychophys. 54, 697705.

HollinsM.BensmaïaS.KarlofK.YoungF. (2000). Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: evidence from multidimensional scaling, Percept. Psychophys. 62, 15341544.

HurvichL. M.JamesonD. (1955). Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory. I. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4, 546552.

JraissatiY. (2010). Purple in Lebanese Lexicons. Unpublished manuscript.

KarwoskiT. F.OdbertH. S.OsgoodC. E. (1942). Studies in synesthetic thinking: II. The role of form in visual response to music, J. Gen. Psychol. 26, 199222.

KimY.-J. (2013). Can eyes smell? Cross-modal correspondences between color hue-tone and fragrance family, Color Res. Appl. 38, 139156.

KöhlerW. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. Liveright, New York, NY, USA.

LevinsonS. C.MajidA. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses, Mind Lang. 29, 407427.

LiP.ZhangF.TsaiE.PulsB. (2014). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): a new dynamic web-based research tool, Biling. (Camb. Engl.) 17, 673680.

LudwigV. U.SimnerJ. (2013). What colour does that feel? Tactile–visual mapping and the development of cross-modality, Cortex 49, 10891099.

MaltB.GennariS.ImmaiM.AmeelE.SajiN.MajidA. (in press). Where are the concepts? What words can and can’t reveal, in: Concepts: New Directions, MargolisE.LaurenceS. (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

MarksL. E. (1974). On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch and loudness, Am. J. Psychol. 87, 173188.

MartinoG.MarksL. E. (1999). Cross-modal interaction in vision and touch, poster presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

MelaraR.MarksL. E. (1990). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions, Mem. Cogn. 18, 477495.

MonroeM. (1925). The apparent weight of color and correlated phenomena, Am. J. Psychol. 36, 196206.

MunsellA. H. (1941). A Color Notation: An Illustrated System Defining All Colors and Their Relations. The Hoffman Borthers Co., Boston, MA, USA.

MurphyV. N. (2011). Olfactory maps in the brain, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 233258.

NewhallS.NickersonD.JuddD. (1943). Final report of the OSA sub-committee on the spacing of the Munsell colors, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33, 385418.

PalmerS. E.SchlossK. B.XuZ.Prado-LeónL. R. (2013). Music–color associations are mediated by emotion, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 88368841.

PariseV. C.SpenceC. (2009). ‘When birds of a feather flock together’: synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes, PLoS One 4, e5664. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0005664.

PicardD.DacremontC.ValentinD.GiboreauA. (2003). Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures, Acta Psychol. 114, 165184.

RamachandranV. S.HubbardE. M. (2001). Synaesthesia — a window into perception, thought and language, J. Consc. Stud. 8, 334.

RomneyA. K.IndowT. (2002). A model for the simultaneous analysis of reflectance spectra and basis factors of Munsell color samples under D65 illumination in three-dimensional Euclidean space, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99, 1154311546.

RoschE. (1973). Natural categories, Cogn. Psychol. 4, 328350.

RoschE. (1999). Principles of categorization, in: Concepts: Core Readings, MargolisE.LaurenceS. (Eds), pp.  189206. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories, Cogn. Psychol. 7, 573605.

Rosch HeiderE. (1972). Probabilities, sampling, and ethnoraphic method: the case of Dani colour names, Man 7, 448466.

SchiffersteinH. N. J.TanudjajaI. (2004). Visualising fragrances through colours: the mediating role of emotions, Perception 33, 12491266.

SlobodenyukN.JraissatiY.KansoA.GhanemL.ElhajjI. (2015). Cross-modal associations between color and haptics, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 77, 13791395.

SouffletI.CalonnierM.DacremontC. (2004). A comparison between industrial experts’ and novices’ haptic perceptual organization: a tool to identify descriptors of the handle of fabrics, Food Qual. Pref. 15, 689699.

SpenceC. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 971995.

Tomasik-KrótkiJ.StrojnyJ. (2008). Scaling of sensory impressions, J. Sens. Stud. 23, 251266.

WalkerP. (2012). Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 17921809.

WalkerP.FrancisB.WalkerL. (2010). The brightness-weight illusion: darker objects look heavier but feel lighter, Exp. Psychol. 57, 462469.

YoshidaM. (1968). Dimensions of tactual impressions, Jpn. Psychol. Res. 10, 157173.

Figures

  • In (A) the bars indicate, among the color samples matched to a tactile/haptic term, the percentage of those which carried the label of a given color category. For example: 41.2% of colors matched to ‘soft’ are labeled ‘pink’. Conversely, in (B) the bars indicate, among the color samples carrying a certain color label, the percentage of those which were matched to a given tactile/haptic term. For example 35% of colors labeled ‘pink’ are matched to ‘soft’. The cut-off point for both tactile/haptic and color lexicons is 50%.

    View in gallery
  • Distribution of the adjectives cold/warm (A) and soft/hard (B) onto the Munsell color array as partitioned by the Lebanese Arabic color lexicon (mode map). The letters C and W indicate the location of the adjectives ‘cold’ and ‘warm’, respectively, on the Munsell array, while S and H stand for ‘soft’ and ‘hard’. The size of the letters indicates the strength of the association (i.e., participant consensus as measured by the frequency of choice in a group of participants) between a target color sample and an adjective ‘cold’, ‘warm’, ‘soft’ and ‘hard’. The largest letters indicates the frequency 65x; medium sized letters indicate the frequency 50x<65%; smallest sized letters, in small caps, indicate the frequency 25x<50% and were included here to give a sense of the wider extension of the haptic term in color space. The blocks stand for different Arabic color terms. From left to right, bottom to top: ‘white’, ‘grey’, ‘black’, ‘pink’, ‘red’, ‘orange’, ‘brown’, ‘yellow’, ‘green’, ‘blue’, ‘purple’. This figure is published in color in the online version.

    View in gallery
  • Histograms of the frequency of match of smooth/rough to hue, presented along the Munsell hue circle for values 9 (top) and 2 (bottom). On the circle, the hues vary clockwise from R (at the top of the circle) to Y, YR, Y, GY, G, BG, B, PB, P, RP, and include the four available steps for each hue (2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10) knowing that only two steps were used in this study (2.5 and 7.5). The concentric circles represent the reached consensus level, with increment of 5%. Thus for example, at brightness level 9, smooth is matched to the hue 2.5R by x% of the participants, where x is 60<x65%.

    View in gallery
  • Representation of the most consensual hues on the Munsell hue circle for the following pairs of adjectives, from left to right, top to bottom: smooth/rough, soft/hard, fluid/viscous, humid/dry, warm/cold, light/heavy, and thin/thick. The circles indicate the hue with the highest participant consensus for a specific adjective, with each adjective within a pair being represented by a full or empty circle. The dashed lines represent the two orthogonal axes of opposed colors in Munsell, while the black lines show the relation of the hues matched to opposed adjectives.

    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 4
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0