There is a widespread tendency to associate certain properties of sound with those of colour (e.g., higher pitches with lighter colours). Yet it is an open question how sound influences chroma or hue when properly controlling for lightness. To examine this, we asked participants to adjust physically equiluminant colours until they ‘went best’ with certain sounds. For pure tones, complex sine waves and vocal timbres, increases in frequency were associated with increases in chroma. Increasing the loudness of pure tones also increased chroma. Hue associations varied depending on the type of stimuli. In stimuli that involved only limited bands of frequencies (pure tones, vocal timbres), frequency correlated with hue, such that low frequencies gave blue hues and progressed to yellow hues at 800 Hz. Increasing the loudness of a pure tone was also associated with a shift from blue to yellow. However, for complex sounds that share the same bandwidth of frequencies (100–3200 Hz) but that vary in terms of which frequencies have the most power, all stimuli were associated with yellow hues. This suggests that the presence of high frequencies (above 800 Hz) consistently yields yellow hues. Overall we conclude that while pitch–chroma associations appear to flexibly re-apply themselves across a variety of contexts, frequencies above 800 Hz appear to produce yellow hues irrespective of context. These findings reveal new sound–colour correspondences previously obscured through not controlling for lightness. Findings are discussed in relation to understanding the underlying rules of cross-modal correspondences, synaesthesia, and optimising the sensory substitution of visual information through sound.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Afra P., Funke M., Matsuo F. (2009). Acquired auditory-visual synesthesia: a window to early cross-modal sensory interactions, Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2, 31–37.
Álvaro L., Moreira H., Lillo J., Franklin A. (2015). Color preference in red–green dichromats, Proc. Natl Acad Sci. 112, 9316–9321.
Ayama M., Ikeda M. (1998). Brightness-to-luminance ratio of colored light in the entire chromaticity diagram, Color Res. Appl. 23, 274–287.
Batschelet E. (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press, London, UK.
Berens P. (2009). CircStat: a MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics, J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1–21.
Bien N., Ten Oever S., Goebel R., Sack A. T. (2012). The sound of size: crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: a combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study, Neuroimage 59, 663–672.
Boersma P., Weenink D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
Bond B., Stevens S. (1969). Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds, Percept. Psychophys. 6, 337–339.
Braaten R. (1993). Synesthetic correspondence between visual location and auditory pitch in infants. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
Brainard D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox, Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436.
Cohen Kadosh R., Terhune D. B. (2012). Redefining synaesthesia? Br. J. Psychol. 103, 20–23.
Deroy O., Spence C. (2013). Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so), Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 20, 643–664.
Deroy O., Fasiello I., Hayward V., Auvray M. (2016). Differentiated audio-tactile correspondences in sighted and blind individuals, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42, 1204–1214.
Dolscheid S., Shayan S., Majid A., Casasanto D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity, Psychol. Sci. 24, 613–621.
Eagleman D. M. (2012). Synaesthesia in its protean guises, Br. J. Psychol. 103, 16–19.
Esterman M., Verstynen T., Ivry R. B., Robertson L. C. (2006). Coming unbound: disrupting automatic integration of synesthetic color and graphemes by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right parietal lobe, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1570–1576.
Evans K. K., Treisman A. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features, J. Vis. 10, 6. DOI:10.1167/10.1.6.
Fairchild M. D. (1998). Color Appearance Models. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MA, USA.
Fisher R. A. (1921). On the ‘probable error’ of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample, Metron 1, 3–32.
Fitch W. T. (1997). Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1213–1222.
Fletcher H., Munson W. A. (1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation, Bell Syst. Techn. J. 12, 377–430.
Forder L., He X., Witzel C., Franklin A. (2014). Speakers of different colour lexicons differ only in post-perceptual processing of colour, Perception (ECVP Abstract Suppl.) 43, 33.
Fryer L., Freeman J., Pring L. (2014). Touching words is not enough: how visual experience influences haptic–auditory associations in the ‘Bouba–Kiki’ effect, Cognition 132, 164–173.
Giannakis K. (2001). Sound mosaics: a graphical user interface for sound synthesis based on audio-visual associations. Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University, UK. Retrieved from http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6634/1/Konstantinos-sound_mosaics.phd.pdf.
Goodyear B. G., Menon R. S. (1998). Effect of luminance contrast on BOLD fMRI response in human primary visual areas, J. Neurophysiol. 79, 2204–2207.
Hamilton-Fletcher G., Ward J. (2013). Representing colour through hearing and touch in sensory substitution devices, Multisens. Res. 26, 503–532.
Hamilton-Fletcher G., Wright T. D., Ward J. (2016a). Cross-modal correspondences enhance performance on a colour-to-sound sensory substitution device, Multisens. Res. 29, 337–363.
Hamilton-Fletcher G., Mengucci M., Medeiros F. (2016b). Synaestheatre: sonification of coloured objects in space, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Live Interfaces 2016, Sussex, Brighton, UK, pp. 252–256.
Hamilton-Fletcher G., Obrist M., Watten P., Mengucci M., Ward J. (2016c). ‘I always wanted to see the night sky’: blind user preferences for sensory substitution devices, in: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 2162–2174.
Hupé J. M., Dojat M. (2015). A critical review of the neuroimaging literature on synesthesia, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 103. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00103.
ISO (2003). Acoustics — Normal Equal-Loudness Level Contours. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jewanski J. (2010). Color-tone analogies: a systematic presentation of the principles of correspondence, in: Audiovisuology: Compendium. A Multidisciplinary Survey of Audiovisual Culture, Daniels D., Naumann S., Thoben J. (Eds), pp. 338–347. König, Köln, Germany.
Jonas C., Spiller M. J., Hibbard P. (in press). Summation of visual attributes in auditory-visual crossmodal correspondences, Psychonom. Bull. Rev.
Ludwig V. U., Simner J. (2013). What colour does that feel? Tactile-visual mapping and the development of cross-modality, Cortex 49, 1089–1099.
Ludwig V. U., Adachi I., Matsuzawa T. (2011). Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 20661–20665.
Marks L. E. (1974). On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness, Am. J. Psychol. 87, 173–188.
Marks L. E. (1987). On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 13, 384–394.
Martino G., Marks L. E. (1999). Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis, Perception 28, 903–923.
Melara R. D. (1989). Dimensional interaction between color and pitch, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 69–79.
Mondloch C. J., Maurer D. (2004). Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 133–136.
Moos A., Smith R., Miller S. R., Simmons D. R. (2014). Cross-modal associations in synaesthesia: vowel colours in the ear of the beholder, Iperception 5, 132–142.
Muggleton N., Tsakanikos E., Walsh V., Ward J. (2007). Disruption of synaesthesia following TMS of the right posterior parietal cortex, Neuropsychologia 45, 1582–1585.
Mulert C., Jäger L., Propp S., Karch S., Störmann S., Pogarell O., Möller H.-J., Hegerl U. (2005). Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI, Neuroimage 28, 49–58.
Nayatani Y. (1998). A colorimetric explanation of the Helmholtz–Kohlrausch effect, Color Res. Appl. 23, 374–378.
Newton I. (1979 [1706]). Opticks: or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. Courier Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA.
Novich S., Cheng S., Eagleman D. M. (2011). Is synaesthesia one condition or many? A large-scale analysis reveals subgroups, J. Neuropsychol. 5, 353–371.
Orlandatou K. (2012). The role of pitch and timbre in the synaesthetic experience, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 751–758.
Palmer S. E., Schloss K. B., Xu Z., Prado-León L. R. (2013). Music–color associations are mediated by emotion, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8836–8841.
Parise C. V., Knorre K., Ernst M. O. (2014). Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing, Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 111, 6104–6108.
Pelli D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies, Spat. Vis. 10, 437–442.
Pridmore R. W. (2007). Effects of luminance, wavelength and purity on the color attributes: brief review with new data and perspectives, Color Res. Appl. 32, 208–222.
Root R. T., Ross S. (1965). Further validation of subjective scales for loudness and brightness by means of cross-modality matching, Am. J. Psychol. 78, 285–289.
Schloss K., Lai Y.-H., Witzel C. (2016). Yellow is no happier than blue when lightness and chroma are controlled, J. Vis. 16, 624. DOI:10.1167/16.12.624.
Sebba R. (1991). Structural correspondence between music and color, Color Res. Appl. 16, 81–88.
Sharpe L. T., Stockman A., Jägle H., Nathans J. (1999). Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color blindness, in: Color Vision: from Genes to Perception, Gegenfurtner K. R., Sharpe L. T. (Eds), pp. 3–51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Simner J. (2012a). Defining synaesthesia, Br. J. Psychol. 103, 1–15.
Simner J. (2012b). Defining synaesthesia: a response to two excellent commentaries, Br. J. Psychol. 103, 24–27.
Simner J. (2013). The ‘rules’ of synesthesia, in: Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia, Simner J., Hubbard E. (Eds), pp. 149–164. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Simner J., Ludwig V. U. (2012). The color of touch: a case of tactile-visual synaesthesia, Neurocase 18, 167–180.
Simner J., Mulvenna C., Sagiv N., Tsakanikos E., Witherby S. A., Fraser C., Scott K., Ward J. (2006). Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences, Perception 35, 1024–1033.
Simpson R. H., Quinn M., Ausubel D. P. (1956). Synesthesia in children: association of colors with pure tone frequencies, J. Genet. Psychol. 89, 95–103.
Spence C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 971–995.
Spence C., Deroy O. (2012). Crossmodal correspondences: innate or learned? Iperception 3, 316. DOI:10.1068/i0526ic.
Stevens J. C., Marks L. E. (1965). Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 54, 407–411.
Thornley Head P. D. (2006). Synaesthesia: pitch-colour isomorphism in RGB-space? Cortex 42, 164–174.
Walker P. (2012). Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright, Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 1792–1809.
Walker P., Bremner G., Mason U., Spring J., Mattock K., Slater A., Johnson S. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences, Psychol. Sci. 21, 21–25.
Walsh V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity, Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 483–488.
Ward J. (2013). Synesthesia, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 49–75.
Ward J., Meijer P. (2010). Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device, Consc. Cogn. 19, 492–500.
Ward J., Wright T. (2014). Sensory substitution as an artificially acquired synaesthesia, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 41, 26–35.
Ward J., Huckstep B., Tsakanikos E. (2006). Sound–colour synaesthesia: to what extent does it use cross-modal mechanisms common to us all? Cortex 42, 264–280.
Ward J., Moore S., Thompson-Lake D., Salih S., Beck B. (2008). The aesthetic appeal of auditory — visual synaesthetic perceptions in people without synaesthesia, Perception 37, 1285–1296.
Witthoft N., Winawer J. (2006). Synesthetic colors determined by having colored refrigerator magnets in childhood, Cortex 42, 175–183.
Witthoft N., Winawer J., Eagleman D. M. (2015). Prevalence of learned grapheme-color pairings in a large online sample of synesthetes, PloS One 10, e0118996. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0118996.
Witzel C., Franklin A. (2014). Do focal colors look particularly ‘colorful’? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 31, A365–A374.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1648 | 247 | 31 |
Full Text Views | 431 | 39 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 298 | 82 | 2 |
There is a widespread tendency to associate certain properties of sound with those of colour (e.g., higher pitches with lighter colours). Yet it is an open question how sound influences chroma or hue when properly controlling for lightness. To examine this, we asked participants to adjust physically equiluminant colours until they ‘went best’ with certain sounds. For pure tones, complex sine waves and vocal timbres, increases in frequency were associated with increases in chroma. Increasing the loudness of pure tones also increased chroma. Hue associations varied depending on the type of stimuli. In stimuli that involved only limited bands of frequencies (pure tones, vocal timbres), frequency correlated with hue, such that low frequencies gave blue hues and progressed to yellow hues at 800 Hz. Increasing the loudness of a pure tone was also associated with a shift from blue to yellow. However, for complex sounds that share the same bandwidth of frequencies (100–3200 Hz) but that vary in terms of which frequencies have the most power, all stimuli were associated with yellow hues. This suggests that the presence of high frequencies (above 800 Hz) consistently yields yellow hues. Overall we conclude that while pitch–chroma associations appear to flexibly re-apply themselves across a variety of contexts, frequencies above 800 Hz appear to produce yellow hues irrespective of context. These findings reveal new sound–colour correspondences previously obscured through not controlling for lightness. Findings are discussed in relation to understanding the underlying rules of cross-modal correspondences, synaesthesia, and optimising the sensory substitution of visual information through sound.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1648 | 247 | 31 |
Full Text Views | 431 | 39 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 298 | 82 | 2 |