Cross-Modal Associations Between Color and Touch: Mapping Haptic and Tactile Terms to the Surface of the Munsell Color Solid

Multisensory Research

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This study investigated cross-modal associations between color and touch using a matching task. Participants matched colors drawn from the surface of the Munsell color solid to antonym pairs of haptic/tactile adjectives. For most of the term pairs assessed (soft/hard, smooth/rough, flat/uneven, slippery/not slippery, light/heavy, thin/thick and round/sharp) matching appears predominantly influenced by lightness, with the first term from each pair matched to light colors and the other to dark colors, a result in close agreement with previous research. For two terms, warm and wet, there were clear influences of hue on task performance. There were also similarities between patterns of color matching to several of the haptic/tactile terms assessed and color matching to another term, dislike. This suggests valence may play a mediating role in cross-modal associations involving touch and color.

Cross-Modal Associations Between Color and Touch: Mapping Haptic and Tactile Terms to the Surface of the Munsell Color Solid

Multisensory Research



  • AmediA.MalachR.HendlerT.PeledS.ZoharyE. (2001). Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathwayNat. Neurosci. 4324330.

  • BarburJ. L.HarlowA. J.PlantG. T. (1994). Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortexProc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 258327334.

  • DeRoyO.SpenceC. (2016). Cross-modal correspondences: four challengesMultisens. Res. 292948.

  • ErnstM. O. (2007). Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touchJ. Vis. 7114.

  • GheorghiuE.KingdomF. A. (2007a). Chromatic tuning of contour-shape mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effectsVis. Res. 4719351949.

  • GheorghiuE.KingdomF. A. (2007b). The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effectsVis. Res. 47834844.

  • HoH. N.IwaiD.YoshikawaY.WatanabeJ.NishidaS. (2014a). Combining colour and temperature: a blue object is more likely to be judged as warm than a red objectSci. Rep. 45527. DOI:10.1038/srep05527.

  • HoH.-N.Van DoornG.KawabeT.WatanabeJ.SpenceC. (2014b). Colour-temperature correspondences: when reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colourPLOS OnE 9e91854. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091854.

  • JamesT. W.HumphreyG. K.GatiJ. S.ServosP.MenonR. S.GoodaleM. A. (2002). Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areasNeuropsychol. 4017061714.

  • JraissatiY.SlobodenyukN.KansoA.GhanemL.ElhajjI. (2016). Haptic and tactile adjectives are consistently mapped onto color spaceMultisens. Res. 29253278.

  • KayP.BerlinB.MaffiL.MerrifieldW. R.CookR. (2009). The World Color Survey. CSLI PublicationsStanford, CA, USA.

  • KimY. J. (2013). Can eyes smell? Color Res. Appl. 38139156.

  • LewkowiczD. J.TurkewitzG. (1981). Intersensory interaction in newborns: modification of visual preferences following exposure to soundChild Dev. 52827832.

  • LudwigV. E.SimnerJ. (2013). What colour does that feel? Tactile–visual mapping and the development of cross-modalityCortex 4910891099.

  • MarksL. E. (1975). On colored-hearing synesthesia: cross-modal translations of sensory dimensionsPsychol. Bull. 82303331.

  • MogensenM. F.EnglishH. B. (1926). The apparent warmth of colorsAm. J. Psychol. 37427428.

  • MonroeM. (1925). The apparent weight of color and correlated phenomenaAm. J. Psychol. 36192206.

  • MorganG. A.GoodsonF. E.JonesT. (1975). Age differences in the associations between felt temperatures and color choicesAm. J. Psychol. 88125130.

  • PalmerS. E.SchlossK. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preferenceProc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10788778882.

  • PalmerS. E.SchlossK. B.XuZ.Prado-LeónL. R. (2013). Music-color associations are mediated by emotionProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 11088368841.

  • SchiffersteinH. N.TanudjajaI. (2004). Visualising fragrances through colours: the mediating role of emotionsPerception 3312491266.

  • SchwarzM. W.CowanJ. C.BeattyJ. C. (1987). An experimental comparison of RGB, YIQ, LAB, HSV, and opponent color modelsACM Trans. Graph. 6123158.

  • SlobodenyukN.JraissatiY.KansoA.GhanemL.ElhajjI. (2015). Cross-modal associations between color and hapticsAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 7713791395.

  • SpenceC. (2011). Cross-modal correspondences: a tutorial reviewAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 73971995.

  • StevensS. S. (1957). On the psychophysical lawPsychol. Rev. 64153181.

  • Tromasik-KrotkiJ.StrojnyJ. (2008). Scaling of sensory impressionsJ. Sens. Stud. 23251266.

  • WalshV. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrices of time, space and qualityTrends Cogn. Sci. 7483488.

  • WhitakerT. A.Simões-FranklinC.NewellF. N. (2008). Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture? Brain Res. 12425972.


  • 在图片库中浏览

    Mean number of matches made by participants on trials involving each term pair, for chromatic (a) and achromatic chips (b). For each term pair, darker section of bar represents the first term listed.

  • 在图片库中浏览

    Results of analyses of matches using each term pair. Shaded areas indicate areas of Munsell array (analysis 1), and hues (analysis 2) or lightness levels (analysis 3) significantly associated with terms. See text (Section and following) for details.

  • 在图片库中浏览

    Top panel shows proportion of matches, as more or less than expected assuming matching is based on lightness alone, involving dark stimuli from different hue regions to the term dislike. Other panels show equivalent data for the eight haptic/tactile terms significantly associated with matches to dark stimuli (hard/rough/dry/uneven/not slippery/heavy/thick/sharp). Error bars indicate ± 1 SE; ∗ = significant at 0.01 level; ∗∗ = significant at 0.001 level. See text (Section for further details.

Index Card



全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 143 143 6
全文浏览次数 240 240 3
PDF下载次数 12 12 0
EPUB下载次数 3 3 0