Listeners attempting to understand speech in noisy environments rely on visual and auditory processes, typically referred to as audiovisual processing. Noise corrupts the auditory speech signal and listeners naturally leverage visual cues from the talker’s face in an attempt to interpret the degraded auditory signal. Studies of speech intelligibility in noise show that the maximum improvement in speech recognition performance (i.e., maximum visual enhancement or VEmax), derived from seeing an interlocutor’s face, is invariant with age. Several studies have reported that VEmax is typically associated with a signal-to-noise (SNR) of −12 dB; however, few studies have systematically investigated whether the SNR associated with VEmax changes with age. We investigated if VEmax changes as a function of age, whether the SNR at VEmax changes as a function of age, and what perceptual/cognitive abilities account for or mediate such relationships. We measured VEmax on a nongeriatric adult sample () ranging in age from 20 to 59 years old. We found that VEmax was age-invariant, replicating earlier studies. No perceptual/cognitive measures predicted VEmax, most likely due to limited variance in VEmax scores. Importantly, we found that the SNR at VEmax shifts toward higher (quieter) SNR levels with increasing age; however, this relationship is partially mediated by working memory capacity, where those with larger working memory capacities (WMCs) can identify speech under lower (louder) SNR levels than their age equivalents with smaller WMCs. The current study is the first to report that individual differences in WMC partially mediate the age-related shift in SNR at VEmax.
AkeroydM. A. (2008).
Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults,
Int. J. Audiol.47,
Visual and cognitive predictors of visual enhancement in noisy listening conditions, in:
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, pp.
JansenS. D. (2016). Working memory capacity modulates the effects of noise on speech recognition for non-geriatric adults. PhD Thesis, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10057/12638 (Accessed: 1 December 2016).
Can age-related decline in speech understanding be explained by peripheral hearing loss?J. Am. Acad. Audiol.3,
LoebachJ. L.AltieriN.PisoniD. B. (2012a). Lip reading ability is related to visual attention in normal hearing subjects, unpublished poster presentation at: http://pages.stolaf.edu/loebach/files/2013/01/Loebachetal-ARO-2012.pdf.
LoebachJ. L.BurtonJ.SennottB.PhillipsS.StorkC. (2012b). Lip reading ability is influenced by visual attention, unpublished poster presentation at: http://pages.stolaf.edu/loebach/files/2013/01/Loebachetal-MPA-2012.pdf.
MaW. J.ZhouX.RossL. A.FoxeJ. J.ParraL. C. (2009).
Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space,
PLoS One4, e4638. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0004638.
A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use,
Br. J. Audiol.24,
SennottB.StraehleyI.MorkD.CoppalleR.LoebachJ. L. (2011). Lip-reading ability in normal hearing listeners. Unpublished poster presentation at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Renaud_Coppalle/publication/265161411_Lip-reading_ability_in_normal_hearing_listeners/links/5400b8e60cf2bba34c1a8c6b.pdf.
SommersM. S.Tye-MurrayN.SpeharB. (2005).
Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults,
StevensonR. A.NelmsC. E.BaumS. H.ZurkovskyL.BarenseM. D.NewhouseP. A.WallaceM. T. (2015).
Deficits in audiovisual speech perception in normal aging emerge at the level of whole-word recognition,