Book Review: Our Senses: Gateways to Consciousness, written by Rob DeSalle

in Multisensory Research
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Charles Spence reviews Rob DeSalle’s (2018) new book Our Senses: Gateways to Consciousness, a popular science look at the neuroscience behind the senses set in an evolutionary context.

Book Review: Our Senses: Gateways to Consciousness, written by Rob DeSalle

in Multisensory Research

Sections

References

AdamsW. J.KerriganI. S.GrafE. W. (2016). Touch influences perceived glossSci. Rep. 621866. DOI:10.1038/srep21866.

AuvrayM.MyinE.SpenceC. (2010). The sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational aspects of painNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34214223.

BarlowH.MollonJ. (Eds) (1982). The Senses. Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK.

Baron-CohenS.HarrisonJ.GoldsteinL. H.WykeM. (1993). Coloured speech perception: is synaesthesia what happens when modularity breaks down? Perception 22419426.

BerridgeK. C. (2000). Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patternsNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24173198.

BushdidC.MagnascoM. O.VosshallL. B.KellerA. (2014). Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuliScience 34313701372.

CadieuxM. L.Barnett-CowanM.ShoreD. I. (2010). Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than malesExp. Brain Res. 204431446.

CytowicR. E. (1989). Synaesthesia: a Union of the Senses. SpringerNew York, NY, USA.

DayS. (2005). Some demographic and socio-cultural aspects of synesthesia in: Synesthesia: Perspectives From Cognitive NeuroscienceRobertsonL. C.SagivN. (Eds) pp.  1133. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, USA.

DeroyO.SpenceC. (2013a). Weakening the case for ‘weak synaesthesia’: why crossmodal correspondences are not synaestheticPsychonom. Bull. Rev. 20643664.

DeroyO.SpenceC. (2013b). Learning ’arbitrary’ crossmodal correspondences: staying away from neonatal synaesthesiaNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 3712401253.

DuffyV. B.PetersonJ. M.BartoshukL. M. (2004). Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intakePhysiol. Behav. 82435445.

DurieB. (2005). Future senseN. Sci. 24843336.

GarneauN. L.NuessleT. M.SloanM. M.SantoricoS. A.CoughlinB. C.HayesJ. E. (2014). Crowdsourcing taste research: genetic and phenotypic predictors of bitter taste perception as a modelFront. Integr. Neurosci. 833. DOI:10.3389/fnint.2014.00033.

GrayJ. (1992). Men Are From Mars Women Are From Venus. HarperCollinsNew York, NY, USA.

HughesH. C. (1999). Sensory Exotica: a World Beyond Human Experience. MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

HupéJ.-M.DojatM. (2015). A critical review of the neuroimaging literature on synesthesiaFront. Hum. Neurosci. 9103. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00103.

McGannJ. P. (2017). Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century mythScience 356eaam7263.

McGloneF. P.SpenceC. (2010). Editorial: the cutaneous senses: touch, temperature, pain/itch, and pleasureNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34145147.

MillerI. J.ReedyD. P. (1990). Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perceptionPhysiol. Behav. 4712131219.

RamachandranV. S.HubbardE. M.ButcherP. A. (2004). Synaesthesia, cross-activation, and the foundations of neuroepistemology in: The Handbook of Multisensory ProcessesCalvertG. A.SpenceC.SteinB. E. (Eds) pp.  867883. MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

ShamsL.KamitaniY.ShimojoS. (2000). Illusions: what you see is what you hearNature 408(6814) 788.

SpenceC. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial reviewAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 73971995.

SteinB. E.LondonN.WilkinsonL. K.PriceD. P. (1996). Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: a psychophysical analysisJ. Cogn. Neurosci. 8497506.

SteinerJ. E.GlaserD.HawiloM. E.BerridgeK. C. (2001). Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primatesNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 255374.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 24
Full Text Views 94 94 60
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0