Cross-Sensory Stimuli Modulate Reactions to Aversive Sounds
In: Multisensory ResearchAbstract
We propose that cross-sensory stimuli presenting a positive attributable source of an aversive sound can modulate negative reactions to the sound. In Experiment 1, participants rated original video sources (OVS) of eight aversive sounds (e.g., nails scratching a chalkboard) as more aversive than eight positive attributable video sources (PAVS) of those same sounds (e.g., someone playing a flute) when these videos were presented silently. In Experiment 2, new participants were presented with those eight aversive sounds in three blocks. In Blocks 1 and 3, the sounds were presented alone; in Block 2, four of the sounds were randomly presented concurrently with their corresponding OVS videos, and the other four with their corresponding PAVS videos. Participants rated each sound, presented with or without video, on three scales: discomfort, unpleasantness, and bodily sensations. We found the concurrent presentation of videos robustly modulates participants’ reactions to the sounds: compared to the sounds alone (Block 1), concurrent presentation of PAVS videos significantly reduced negative reactions to the sounds, and the concurrent presentation of OVS videos significantly increased negative reactions, across all three scales. These effects, however, did not linger into Block 3 when the sounds were presented alone again. Our results provide novel evidence that negative reactions to aversive sounds can be modulated through cross-sensory temporal syncing with a positive attributable video source. Although this research was conducted with a neurotypical population, we argue that our findings have implications for the treatment of misophonia.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alais, D. and Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration, Curr. Biol. 14, 257–262.
-
Barratt, E. L. and Davis, N. J. (2015). Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR): a flow-like mental state, PeerJ 3, e851. DOI:10.7717/peerj.851.
-
Bernstein, R. E., Angell, K. L. and Dehle, C. M. (2013). A brief course of cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of misophonia: a case example, Cogn. Behav. Therap. 6, e10. DOI:10.1017/S1754470X13000172.
-
Bruxner, G. (2016). ‘Mastication rage’: a review of misophonia — an under-recognised symptom of psychiatric relevance?, Australas. Psychiat. 24, 195–197.
-
Cox, T. J. (2008). The effect of visual stimuli on the horribleness of awful sounds, Appl. Acoust. 69, 691–703.
-
Dozier, T. H. (2015). Counterconditioning treatment for misophonia, Clin. Case Stud. 14, 374–387.
-
Edelstein, M., Brang, D., Rouw, R. and Ramachandran, V. S. (2013). Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptions, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 296. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00296.
-
Irwin, A., Hall, D. A., Peters, A. and Plack, C. J. (2011). Listening to urban soundscapes: physiological validity of perceptual dimensions, Psychophysiology 48, 258–268.
-
Jastreboff, M. M. and Jastreboff, P. J. (2002). Decreased sound tolerance and tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), Aust. N. Z. J. Audiol. 24, 74–84.
-
Jastreboff, P. J. and Jastreboff, M. M. (2014). Treatments for decreased sound tolerance (hyperacusis and misophonia), Semin. Hear. 35, 105–120.
-
Kumar, S., Forster, H. M., Bailey, P. and Griffiths, T. D. (2008). Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 3810–3817.
-
Kumar, S., von Kriegstein, K., Friston, K. and Griffiths, T. D. (2012). Features versus feelings: dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds, J. Neurosci. 32, 14184–14192.
-
Kumar, S., Hancock, O., Cope, T., Sedley, W., Winston, J. and Griffiths, T. D. (2014). Misophonia: a disorder of emotion processing of sounds, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 85, P023. DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2014-308883.38.
-
McErlean, A. B. J. and Banissy, M. J. (2018). Increased misophonia in self-reported autonomous sensory meridian response, PeerJ 6, e5351. DOI:10.7717/peerj.5351.
-
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices, Nature 264, 746–748.
-
Mirz, F., Gjedde, A., Sdkilde-Jrgensen, H. and Pedersen, C. B. (2000). Functional brain imaging of tinnitus-like perception induced by aversive auditory stimuli, Neuroreport 11, 633–637.
-
Munhall, K. G., Gribble, P., Sacco, L. and Ward, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect, Percept. Psychophys. 58, 351–362.
-
Reuter, C. and Oehler, M. (2011). Psychoacoustics of chalkboard squeaking, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2545.
-
Reuter, C., Oehler, M. and Mühlhans, J. (2014). Physiological and acoustical correlates of unpleasant sounds, in: Proceedings of the Joint Conference ICMPC13-APSCOM5. Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, p. 97.
-
Rouw, R. and Erfanian, M. (2018). A large-scale study of misophonia, J. Clin. Psychol. 74, 453–479.
-
Schröder, A., Vulink, N. and Denys, D. (2013). Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder, PloS One 8(1), e54706. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0054706.
-
Schröder, A. E., Vulink, N. C., van Loon, A. J. and Denys, D. A. (2017). Cognitive behavioral therapy is effective in misophonia: an open trial, J. Affect. Disord. 217, 289–294.
-
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B. and Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception, Nature 384, 308.
-
Shimojo, S. and Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 505–509.
-
Taylor, V. (2014). Youtube videos trigger tingling ‘brain orgasms’ in ASMR practitioners. Available from http://www.nydailynews.com/.
-
Thibodeau, P. H. (2016). A moist crevice for word aversion: in semantics not sounds, PloS One 11, e0153686. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0153686.
-
Viinikainen, M., Kätsyri, J. and Sams, M. (2012). Representation of perceived sound valence in the human brain, Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 2295–2305.
-
Zald, D. H. and Pardo, J. V. (2002). The neural correlates of aversive auditory stimulation, Neuroimage 16, 746–753.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1216 | 273 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 99 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 17 | 3 |
Cross-Sensory Stimuli Modulate Reactions to Aversive Sounds
In: Multisensory ResearchAbstract
We propose that cross-sensory stimuli presenting a positive attributable source of an aversive sound can modulate negative reactions to the sound. In Experiment 1, participants rated original video sources (OVS) of eight aversive sounds (e.g., nails scratching a chalkboard) as more aversive than eight positive attributable video sources (PAVS) of those same sounds (e.g., someone playing a flute) when these videos were presented silently. In Experiment 2, new participants were presented with those eight aversive sounds in three blocks. In Blocks 1 and 3, the sounds were presented alone; in Block 2, four of the sounds were randomly presented concurrently with their corresponding OVS videos, and the other four with their corresponding PAVS videos. Participants rated each sound, presented with or without video, on three scales: discomfort, unpleasantness, and bodily sensations. We found the concurrent presentation of videos robustly modulates participants’ reactions to the sounds: compared to the sounds alone (Block 1), concurrent presentation of PAVS videos significantly reduced negative reactions to the sounds, and the concurrent presentation of OVS videos significantly increased negative reactions, across all three scales. These effects, however, did not linger into Block 3 when the sounds were presented alone again. Our results provide novel evidence that negative reactions to aversive sounds can be modulated through cross-sensory temporal syncing with a positive attributable video source. Although this research was conducted with a neurotypical population, we argue that our findings have implications for the treatment of misophonia.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1216 | 273 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 99 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 17 | 3 |