Taste the Bass: Low Frequencies Increase the Perception of Body and Aromatic Intensity in Red Wine
In: Multisensory ResearchSearch for other papers by Jo Burzynska in
Current site
Google Scholar
Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Oxford University, UK
Search for other papers by Qian Janice Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Charles Spence in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Susan Elaine Putnam Bastian in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Associations between heaviness and bass/low-pitched sounds reverberate throughout music, philosophy, literature, and language. Given that recent research into the field of cross-modal correspondences has revealed a number of robust relationships between sound and flavour, this exploratory study was designed to investigate the effects of lower frequency sound (10 Hz to 200 Hz) on the perception of the mouthfeel character of palate weight/body. This is supported by an overview of relevant cross-modal studies and cultural production. Wines were the tastants — a New Zealand Pinot Noir and a Spanish Garnacha — which were tasted in silence and with a 100 Hz (bass) and a higher 1000 Hz sine wave tone. Aromatic intensity was included as an additional character given suggestions that pitch may influence the perception of aromas, which might presumably affect the perception of wine body. Intensity of acidity and liking were also evaluated. The results revealed that the Pinot Noir wine was rated as significantly fuller-bodied when tasted with a bass frequency than in silence or with a higher frequency sound. The low frequency stimulus also resulted in the Garnacha wine being rated as significantly more aromatically intense than when tasted in the presence of the higher frequency auditory stimulus. Acidity was rated considerably higher with the higher frequency in both wines by those with high wine familiarity and the Pinot Noir significantly better liked than the Garnacha. Possible reasons as to why the tones used in this study affected perception of the two wines differently are discussed. Practical application of the findings are also proposed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Belkin, K., Martin, R., Kemp, S. E. and Gilbert, A. N. (1997). Auditory pitch as a perceptual analogue to odor quality, Psychol. Sci. 8, 340–342.
-
Ben-Artzi, E. and Marks, L. E. (1995). Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference, Percept. Psychophys. 57, 1151–1162.
-
Bronner, K., Bruhn, H., Hirt, R. and Piper, D. (2012). What is the sound of citrus? Research on the correspondences between the perception of sound and flavour, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM), Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 142–148.
-
Brunetti, R., Indraccolo, A., Del Gatto, C., Spence, C. and Santangelo, V. (2018). Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 80, 527–534.
-
Burzynska, J. (2018a). Assessing oenosthesia: blending wine and sound, Int. J. Food Des. 3, 83–101.
-
Burzynska, J. (2018b). Oenosonic immersion at Pollinaria. http://joburzynska.com/oenosonic-immersion-at-pollinaria/. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
-
Chiou, R. and Rich, A. N. (2012). Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting, Perception 41, 339–353.
-
Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2009). Implicit association between basic tastes and pitch, Neurosci. Lett. 464, 39–42.
-
Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2010a). As bitter as a trombone: synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetes between tastes/flavors and musical notes, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 1994–2002.
-
Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2010b). A sweet sound? Food names reveal implicit associations between taste and pitch, Perception 39, 417–425.
-
Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2011). A fruity note: crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes, Chem. Sens. 37, 151–158.
-
Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2012). The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes, Food Qual. Pref. 24, 136–140.
-
Crisinel, A.-S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J. and Spence, C. (2012). A bittersweet symphony: systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic properties of the soundtrack playing in the background, Food Qual. Pref. 24, 201–204.
-
D’Amato, S. (2017). Wine in the sky, edgy finds and New World gems. https://www.winealign.com/articles/2017/03/02/buyers-guide-to-vintages-march-4th-2017/. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
-
Danner, L., Crump, A. M., Croker, A., Gambetta, J. M., Johnson, T. E. and Bastian, S. E. P. (2018). Comparison of rate-all-that-apply and descriptive analysis for the sensory profiling of wine, Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 69, 12–21.
-
Datsik (2009). Gizmo / Gecko, Basshead. Mp3.
-
Deroy, O., Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 878–896.
-
Deroy, O., Fernandez-Prieto, I., Navarra, J. and Spence, C. (2018). Unravelling the paradox of spatial pitch, in: Spatial Biases in Perception and Cognition, T. L. Hubbard (Ed.), pp. 77–93. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
-
Dolscheid, S., Hunnius, S., Casasanto, D. and Majid, A. (2014). Prelinguistic infants are sensitive to space-pitch associations found across cultures, Psychol. Sci. 25, 1256–1261.
-
Gacula Jr, M. and Rutenbeck, S. (2006). Sample size in consumer test and descriptive analysis, J. Sens. Stud. 21, 129–145.
-
Galeyev, B. M. (2003). Evolution of gravitational synesthesia in music: to color and light! Leonardo 36, 129–134.
-
Gawel, R. (2006). Importance of ‘texture’ to red wine quality acknowledged by the development of a red wine “Mouth-feel Wheel”. http://www.aromadictionary.com/articles/winemouthfeel_article.html. Retrieved 1 February 2006.
-
Gawel, R., Schulkin, A., Smith, P., Kassara, S., Francis, L., Herderich, M. and Johnson, D. (2018). Influence of wine polysaccharides on white and red wine mouthfeel, Wine Viticult. J. 33, 34–37.
-
Grainger, K. (2009). Wine Quality: Tasting and Selection. John Wiley and Sons, Oxford, UK.
-
Henriques, J. (2003). Sonic dominance and the reggae sound system session, in: The Auditory Culture Reader, M. Bull and L. Black (Eds), pp. 451–480. Berg, Oxford, UK.
-
Henriques, J. (2011). Sonic Bodies: Reggae Sound Systems, Performance Techniques, and Ways of Knowing. Bloomsbury, New York, NY.
-
Holt-Hansen, K. (1968). Taste and pitch, Percept. Mot. Skills 27, 59–68.
-
Holt-Hansen, K. (1976). Extraordinary experiences during cross-modal perception, Percept. Mot. Skills 43, 1023–1027.
-
Huysmans, J.-K. (1959). Against Nature [a new translation of À Rebours]. Transl. by Robert Baldick. Penguin Books, London, UK.
-
International Organization for Standardization (2003). Acoustics — Normal equal-loudness-level contours. (ISO Standard No. 226). https://www.iso.org/standard/34222.html. Retrieved 4 October 2017.
-
International Organization for Standardization (2007). Sensory analysis — General guidance for the design of test rooms. (ISO Standard No 8589). https://www.iso.org/standard/36385.html. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
-
Jackson, R. S. (2009). Wine Tasting: a Professional Handbook. Academic Press, London, UK.
-
Jasen, P. C. (2017). Low End Theory: Bass, Bodies and the Materiality of Sonic Experience. Bloomsbury Press, London, UK.
-
Knoeferle, K. M., Woods, A., Käppler, F. and Spence, C. (2015). That sounds sweet: using cross-modal correspondences to communicate gustatory attributes, Psychol. Market. 32, 107–120.
-
Knöferle, K. and Spence, C. (2012). Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 992–1006.
-
Kontukoski, M., Luomala, H., Mesz, B., Sigman, M., Trevisan, M., Rotola-Pukkila, M. and Hopia, A. I. (2015). Sweet and sour: music and taste associations, Nutr. Food Sci. 45, 357–376.
-
Laguna, L., Bartolomé, B. and Moreno-Arribas, M. V. (2017). Mouthfeel perception of wine: oral physiology, components and instrumental characterization, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 59, 49–59.
-
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load, Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 75–82.
-
Leventhall, G., Pelmear, P. and Benton, S. (2003). A review of published research on low frequency noise and its effects. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/935y3/a-review-of-published-research-on-low-frequency-noise-and-its-effects. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
-
Macdermott, M. M. (1940). Vowel Sounds in Poetry: Their Music and Tone-Color. Kegan Paul, London, UK.
-
McAngus Todd, N. P., Rosengren, S. M. and Colebatch, J. G. (2008). Tuning and sensitivity of the human vestibular system to low-frequency vibration, Neurosci. Lett. 444, 36–41.
-
Meilgaard, M. C., Civille, G. V. and Carr, B. T. (2006). Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH, USA.
-
Mesz, B., Trevisan, M. A. and Sigman, M. (2011). The taste of music, Perception 40, 209–219.
-
Mesz, B., Sigman, M. and Trevisan, M. A. (2012). A composition algorithm based on crossmodal taste-music correspondences, Front, Hum. Neurosci. 6, 71. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00071.
-
Moran, M. (2017). Tannins are all about that bass. Sunday Times, London, UK, 26 Feb, 13.
-
Mouritsen, O. and Styrbæk, K. (2017). Mouthfeel: How Texture Makes Taste (transl. M. Johansen). Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
-
Murphy, S., Spence, C. and Dalton, P. (2017). Auditory perceptual load: a review, Hear. Res. 352, 40–48.
-
Niimi, J., Danner, L., Li, L., Bossan, H. and Bastian, S. E. P. (2017). Wine consumers’ subjective responses to wine mouthfeel and understanding of wine body, Food Res. Int. 99, 115–122.
-
Oxford Living Dictionaries. Retrieved 5 November 2018. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/heaviness.
-
Paravisini, L. and Guichard, E. (2017). Interactions between aroma compounds and food matrix, in: Flavour: from Food to Perception, E. Guichard, C. Salles, M. Morzel and A.-M. Le Bon (Eds), pp. 208–234. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
-
Parise, C. V. (2016). Crossmodal correspondences: standing issues and experimental guidelines, Multisens. Res. 29, 7–28.
-
Parise, C. V., Knorre, K. and Ernst, M. O. (2014). Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6104–6108.
-
Reinoso-Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. (J.), De Causmaecker, B., Steenhaut, K., Van Ee, R. and Spence, C. (2016a). Tune that beer! Listening for the pitch of beer, Beverages 2, 31. DOI:10.3390/beverages2040031.
-
Reinoso-Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. (J.), Van Ee, R. and Spence, C. (2016b). The influence of soundscapes on the perception and evaluation of beers, Food Qual. Pref. 52, 32–41.
-
Rudmin, F. and Cappelli, M. (1983). Tone–taste synesthesia: a replication, Percept. Motor Skills 56, 118. DOI:10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.118.
-
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. and Sicoli, M. A. (2011). The thickness of pitch: crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec, Sens. Soc. 6, 96–105.
-
Simner, J., Cuskley, C. and Kirby, S. (2010). What sound does that taste? Cross-modal mapping across gustation and audition, Perception 39, 553–569.
-
Spence, C. (2011). Wine and music, World Fine Wine 31, 96–104.
-
Spence, C. (2014). Noise and its impact on the perception of food and drink, Flavour 3, 9. DOI:10.1186/2044-7248-3-9.
-
Spence, C. (2015). Eating with our ears: assessing the importance of the sounds of consumption on our perception and enjoyment of multisensory flavour experiences, Flavour 4, 3. DOI:10.1186/2044-7248-4-3.
-
Spence, C. (2017). Sonic seasoning, in: Audio Branding: Using Sound to Build Your Brand, L. Minsky and C. Fahey (Eds), pp. 52–58. Kogan Page, London, UK.
-
Spence, C. (2019a). Multisensory experiential wine marketing, Food Qual. Pref. 71, 106–116.
-
Spence, C. (2019b). On the relationship(s) between colour and taste/flavor, Exp. Psychol. 66, 99–111. DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000439.
-
Spence, C. (2019c). On the relative nature of (pitch-based) crossmodal correspondences, Multisens. Res. 32, 235–265. DOI:10.1163/22134808-20191407.
-
Spence, C. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2016). Oral-somatosensory contributions to flavor perception and the appreciation of food and drink, in: Multisensory Flavor Perception: from Fundamental Neuroscience Through to the Marketplace, B. Piqueras-Fiszman and C. Spence (Eds), pp. 59–79. Elsevier/Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, UK.
-
Spence, C. and Wang, Q. (J.) (2015a). Wine and music (I): on the crossmodal matching of wine and music, Flavour 4, 34. DOI:10.1186/s13411-015-0045-x.
-
Spence, C. and Wang, Q. (J.) (2015b). Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound, Flavour 4, 33. DOI:10.1186/s13411-015-0043-z.
-
Spence, C. and Wang, Q. J. (2015c). Wine and music (III): so what if music influences the taste of the wine? Flavour 4, 36. DOI:10.1186/s13411-015-0046-9.
-
Spence, C. and Wang, Q. J. (2018). What does the term ‘complexity’ mean in the world of wine? Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 14, 45–54.
-
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law, Psychol., Rev. 64, 153–181.
-
Szczesniak, A. S. (1979). Classification of mouthfeel characteristics of beverages, in: Food Texture and Rheology, P. Sherman (Ed.), pp. 1–20. Academic Press, London, UK.
-
Tournier, C., Sulmont-Rossé, C. and Guichard, E. (2007). Flavour perception: aroma, taste and texture interactions, Food 1, 246–257.
-
Turoman, N., Velasco, C., Chen, Y.-C., Huang, P.-C. and Spence, C. (2018). Tasting transformations: symmetry and its role in the crossmodal correspondence between shape and taste, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 80, 738–751.
-
Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Deroy, O. and Spence, C. (2015). Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape, Food Qual. Pref. 41, 151–158.
-
Walker, L., Walker, P. and Francis, B. (2012). A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains, Perception 41, 1186–1192.
-
Walker, P. (2016). Cross-sensory correspondences: a theoretical framework and their relevance to music, Psychomusicol. Music Mind Brain 26, 103–116.
-
Walker, P., Scallon, G. and Francis, B. (2017). Cross-sensory correspondences: heaviness is dark and low-pitched, Perception 46, 772–792.
-
Wang, Q. (J.) and Spence, C. (2015). Assessing the effect of musical congruency on wine tasting in a live performance setting, i-Perception 6. DOI:10.1177/2041669515593027.
-
Wang, Q. (J.) and Spence, C. (2018). Assessing the influence of music on wine perception among wine professionals, Food Sci. Nutr. 6, 295–301.
-
Wang, Q. (J.), Woods, A. and Spence, C. (2015). “What’s your taste in music?” A comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes, i-Perception 6, 2041669515622001. DOI:10.1177/2041669515622001.
-
Wang, Q. J., Wang, S. and Spence, C. (2016). “Turn up the taste”: assessing the role of taste intensity and emotion in mediating crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and pitch, Chem. Sens. 41, 345–356.
-
Yan, K. S. and Dando, R. (2015). A crossmodal role for audition in taste perception, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 41, 590–596.
-
Zampini, M. and Spence, C. (2004). The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips, J. Sens. Stud. 19, 347–363.
-
Zbikowski, L. M. (1998). Metaphor and music theory: reflections from cognitive science, Music Theory Online 4. http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.98.4.1/mto.98.4.1.zbikowski.html. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
-
Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2550 | 309 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 178 | 24 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 218 | 18 | 2 |
Taste the Bass: Low Frequencies Increase the Perception of Body and Aromatic Intensity in Red Wine
In: Multisensory ResearchSearch for other papers by Jo Burzynska in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Oxford University, UK
Search for other papers by Qian Janice Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charles Spence in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Susan Elaine Putnam Bastian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Associations between heaviness and bass/low-pitched sounds reverberate throughout music, philosophy, literature, and language. Given that recent research into the field of cross-modal correspondences has revealed a number of robust relationships between sound and flavour, this exploratory study was designed to investigate the effects of lower frequency sound (10 Hz to 200 Hz) on the perception of the mouthfeel character of palate weight/body. This is supported by an overview of relevant cross-modal studies and cultural production. Wines were the tastants — a New Zealand Pinot Noir and a Spanish Garnacha — which were tasted in silence and with a 100 Hz (bass) and a higher 1000 Hz sine wave tone. Aromatic intensity was included as an additional character given suggestions that pitch may influence the perception of aromas, which might presumably affect the perception of wine body. Intensity of acidity and liking were also evaluated. The results revealed that the Pinot Noir wine was rated as significantly fuller-bodied when tasted with a bass frequency than in silence or with a higher frequency sound. The low frequency stimulus also resulted in the Garnacha wine being rated as significantly more aromatically intense than when tasted in the presence of the higher frequency auditory stimulus. Acidity was rated considerably higher with the higher frequency in both wines by those with high wine familiarity and the Pinot Noir significantly better liked than the Garnacha. Possible reasons as to why the tones used in this study affected perception of the two wines differently are discussed. Practical application of the findings are also proposed.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2550 | 309 | 53 |
| Full Text Views | 178 | 24 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 218 | 18 | 2 |