Save

Size and Quality of Drawings Made by Adults Under Visual and Haptic Control

In: Multisensory Research
Authors:
Magdalena SzubielskaInstitute of Psychology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Search for other papers by Magdalena Szubielska in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Magdalena+Szubielska
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-0871
,
Paweł AugustynowiczInstitute of Psychology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Search for other papers by Paweł Augustynowicz in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Pawe%C5%82+Augustynowicz
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-4580
, and
Delphine PicardAix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE, 13621 Aix-en-Provence cedex 01, France

Search for other papers by Delphine Picard in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Delphine+Picard
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4578-7260
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold. First, our objective was to test the influence of an object’s actual size (size rank) on the drawn size of the depicted object. We tested the canonical size effect (i.e., drawing objects larger in the physical world as larger) in four drawing conditions — two perceptual conditions (blindfolded or sighted) crossed with two materials (paper or special foil for producing embossed drawings). Second, we investigated whether drawing quality (we analysed both the local and global criteria of quality) depends on drawing conditions. We predicted that drawing quality, unlike drawing size, would vary according to drawing conditions — namely, being higher when foil than paper was used for drawing production in the blindfolded condition. We tested these hypotheses with young adults who repeatedly drew eight different familiar objects (differentiated by size in the real world) in four drawing conditions. As expected, drawn size increased linearly with increasing size rank, whatever the drawing condition, thus replicating the canonical size effect and showing that this effect was not dependent on drawing conditions. In line with our hypothesis, in the blindfolded condition drawing quality was better when foil rather than paper was used, suggesting a benefit from haptic feedback on the trace produced. Besides, the quality of drawings produced was still higher in the sighted than the blindfolded condition. In conclusion, canonical size is present under different drawing conditions regardless of whether sight is involved or not, while perceptual control increases drawing quality in adults.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 113 113 23
Full Text Views 11 11 1
PDF Views & Downloads 20 20 4