Save

History and Vulnerability: A Response to Levene and Furey

In: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Author:
Nathan Rein Ursinus College, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Olin 220, Collegeville, PA 19426

Search for other papers by Nathan Rein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The articles by N. Levene (writing on St. Anselm's Proslogion) and C. Furey (on Thomas More's Utopia) in this volume offer a nuanced critical perspective on historicist tendencies in the study of religion. While insisting on the importance of seeing primary texts as embedded in their historical context, both propose that scholars simultaneously seek to maintain an element of openness and vulnerability to the voices of the past. This can serve as a counterweight to the typical historicist strategy of debunking and unmasking the past's pretensions to authoritative discourse.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 146 14 0
Full Text Views 77 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 21 6 0