Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article works with theory of ritual in order to begin addressing a series of questions raised by Brazilian spirit possession rituals (in Kardecism and Umbanda). Four contributions to theory of ritual highlight relevant conceptual issues: Humphrey and Laidlaw on non-intentionality; Bloch on deference; Houseman and Severi on social relations; and Kapferer on virtuality. Strawson’s philosophical distinction between objective and reactive attitudes toward intentionality is used to make a case (i) that certain formal aspects of ritual (indexicals) serve to (ii) mark culturally-variable attitudes to agency within rituals, which are related to, but fundamentally distinct from, non-ritual attitudes to agency.

Ritual Theory and Attitudes to Agency in Brazilian Spirit Possession

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 5
Full Text Views 41 41 19
PDF Downloads 8 8 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0