Several theorists argue that the concept of “religion” is not a cultural universal but rather emerged under particular historical and political conditions in the modern post-Reformation west. “Religion,” they say, is a social construction. What are the implications of this view of the ontology of religion? My aim in this paper is to critically engage the arguments of Timothy Fitzgerald—a social constructionist about religion who combines, in my judgment, insight and confusion on the issue—in order to trace out the values and the limits of this approach.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alston William P. Edwards Paul “Religion” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1967 Vol. 7 New York Macmillan Publishing Co
Balagangadhara S. N. ‘The Heathen in His Blindness . . .’: Asia, the West and the Dynamic of Religion 1994 Leiden Brill
Boghossian Paul A. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Contructivism 2006 Oxford Clarendon Press
Casanova José Public Religions in the Modern World 1994 Chicago The University of Chicago Press
Chernus Ira “The War in Iraq and the Academic Study of Religion” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2008 December 76 4 844 873
Chidester David Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa 1996 Charlottesville The University Press of Virginia
Dubuisson Daniel The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology 2003 Baltimore, MD The John Hopkins University Press
Fitzgerald Timothy “Ritual, Politics, and Soteriology in Ambedkar Buddhism” Indian Journal of Buddhist Studies 1994 5 25 44
Fitzgerald Timothy “A Critique of ‘Religion’ as a Cross-Cultural Category” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 1997 9 2 91 110
Fitzgerald Timothy The Ideology of Religious Studies 2000a New York Oxford University Press
Fitzgerald Timothy Braun Willi & McCutcheon Russell “Experience” Guide to the Study of Religion 2000b London Cassell
Fitzgerald Timothy “Playing Language Games and Performing Rituals: Religious Studies as Ideological State Apparatus” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 2003 15 3
Fitzgerald Timothy Fitzgerald Timothy “Introduction” Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations 2007a London Equinox
Fitzgerald Timothy Fitzgerald Timothy “Encompassing Religion, Privatized Religions, and the Invention of Modern Politics” Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations 2007b London Equinox
Fitzgerald Timothy Discourse on Civility and Barbarity 2007c New York Oxford University Press
Gilbert Margaret On Social Facts 1992 Princeton Princeton University Press
Griffiths Paul J. “The Very Idea of Religion” First Things 2000 May 103 30 35
Horton Robin “A Definition of Religion, and its Uses” Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West 1993 Cambridge University Press
Jensen Jeppe “Is a Phenomenology of Religion Possible? On the Ideas of a Human and Social Science of Religion” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 1993 5 1 109 133 (1993)
Juergensmeyer Mark The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State 1994 Berkeley University of California Press
Lincoln Bruce Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11 2003 Chicago The University of Chicago Press
McCutcheon Russell T. Critics not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion 2001 Albany State University of New York Press
Saler Benson Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent natives, Unbounded Categories 1993 Leiden E. J. Brill
Schilbrack Kevin “Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch” Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics 2009 November 48 4 399 413 2009
Schilbrack Kevin “Religions: Are There Any?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 December 78 4 1112 1138 2010
Schmitt Fredrick Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality 2003 Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield
Searle John R. The Construction of Social Reality 1995 New York The Free Press
Searle John R. “Why Should You Believe It?” The New York Review of Books 2009 Sept. 4 56 14 88 92
Segal Robert “Classification and Comparison in the Study of Religion: The Work of Jonathan Z. Smith” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2005 December 73 4 1175 1188
Slingerland Edward “Conceptual Metaphor Theory as Methodology for Comparative Religion” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2004 March 72 1 1 31
Smart Ninian Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs 1996 Berkeley University of California Press
Smith Christian Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture 2003 Oxford University Press
Smith Jonathan Z. Taylor Mark C. “Religion, Religions, Religious” Critical Terms for Religious Studies 1998 Chicago The University of Chicago Press
Smith Wilfred Cantwell Eliade Mircea & Kitagawa Joseph M. “Comparative Religion: Whither—and Why?” The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology 1959 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Smith Wilfred Cantwell The Meaning and End of Religion 1962 Minneapolis Fortress
Snyder Samuel “New Streams of Religion: Fly Fishing as a Lived, Religion of Nature” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2007 December 75 4 896 922
Stowers Stanley Braun Willi & McCutcheon Russell T. “The Ontology of Religion” Introducing Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith 2009 London Equinox
Taylor Charles Sources of the Self 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Weibe Donald The Politics of Religious Studies 2000 Palgrave Macmillan
Webb Mark Owen “An Eliminativist Theory of Religion” Sophia 2009 February 48 1 35 42
Yinger J. Milton The Scientific Study of Religion 1970 New York Macmillan
Robert Segal (2005) also makes this argument.
Latour says, before 1882, when the tuberculosis bacillus was discovered, “the bacillus had no real existence.” For the ridicule, see Boghossian; Searle 2009.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3656 | 346 | 39 |
Full Text Views | 533 | 41 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 518 | 74 | 1 |
Several theorists argue that the concept of “religion” is not a cultural universal but rather emerged under particular historical and political conditions in the modern post-Reformation west. “Religion,” they say, is a social construction. What are the implications of this view of the ontology of religion? My aim in this paper is to critically engage the arguments of Timothy Fitzgerald—a social constructionist about religion who combines, in my judgment, insight and confusion on the issue—in order to trace out the values and the limits of this approach.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 3656 | 346 | 39 |
Full Text Views | 533 | 41 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 518 | 74 | 1 |