Save

The Social Construction of “Religion” and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald

In: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Author:
Kevin Schilbrack Department of Philosophy and Religion 226-A Stillwell, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA kschilbrack@email.wcu.edu

Search for other papers by Kevin Schilbrack in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Several theorists argue that the concept of “religion” is not a cultural universal but rather emerged under particular historical and political conditions in the modern post-Reformation west. “Religion,” they say, is a social construction. What are the implications of this view of the ontology of religion? My aim in this paper is to critically engage the arguments of Timothy Fitzgerald—a social constructionist about religion who combines, in my judgment, insight and confusion on the issue—in order to trace out the values and the limits of this approach.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3045 277 30
Full Text Views 449 54 14
PDF Views & Downloads 365 147 55