The Social Construction of “Religion” and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Several theorists argue that the concept of “religion” is not a cultural universal but rather emerged under particular historical and political conditions in the modern post-Reformation west. “Religion,” they say, is a social construction. What are the implications of this view of the ontology of religion? My aim in this paper is to critically engage the arguments of Timothy Fitzgerald—a social constructionist about religion who combines, in my judgment, insight and confusion on the issue—in order to trace out the values and the limits of this approach.

The Social Construction of “Religion” and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Sections

References

AlstonWilliam P. EdwardsPaul “Religion” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1967 Vol. 7 New York Macmillan Publishing Co

BalagangadharaS. N. ‘The Heathen in His Blindness . . .’: Asia the West and the Dynamic of Religion 1994 Leiden Brill

BoghossianPaul A. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Contructivism 2006 Oxford Clarendon Press

CasanovaJosé Public Religions in the Modern World 1994 Chicago The University of Chicago Press

ChernusIra “The War in Iraq and the Academic Study of Religion” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2008 December 76 4 844 873

ChidesterDavid Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa 1996 Charlottesville The University Press of Virginia

DubuissonDaniel The Western Construction of Religion: Myths Knowledge and Ideology 2003 Baltimore, MD The John Hopkins University Press

FitzgeraldTimothy “Ritual, Politics, and Soteriology in Ambedkar Buddhism” Indian Journal of Buddhist Studies 1994 5 25 44

FitzgeraldTimothy “A Critique of ‘Religion’ as a Cross-Cultural Category” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 1997 9 2 91 110

FitzgeraldTimothy The Ideology of Religious Studies 2000a New York Oxford University Press

FitzgeraldTimothy BraunWilliMcCutcheonRussell “Experience” Guide to the Study of Religion 2000b London Cassell

FitzgeraldTimothy “Playing Language Games and Performing Rituals: Religious Studies as Ideological State Apparatus” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 2003 15 3

FitzgeraldTimothy FitzgeraldTimothy “Introduction” Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations 2007a London Equinox

FitzgeraldTimothy FitzgeraldTimothy “Encompassing Religion, Privatized Religions, and the Invention of Modern Politics” Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations 2007b London Equinox

FitzgeraldTimothy Discourse on Civility and Barbarity 2007c New York Oxford University Press

GilbertMargaret On Social Facts 1992 Princeton Princeton University Press

GriffithsPaul J. “The Very Idea of Religion” First Things 2000 May 103 30 35

HortonRobin “A Definition of Religion, and its Uses” Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West 1993 Cambridge University Press

JensenJeppe “Is a Phenomenology of Religion Possible? On the Ideas of a Human and Social Science of Religion” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 1993 5 1 109 133 (1993)

JuergensmeyerMark The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State 1994 Berkeley University of California Press

LincolnBruce Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11 2003 Chicago The University of Chicago Press

McCutcheonRussell T. Critics not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion 2001 Albany State University of New York Press

SalerBenson Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists Transcendent natives Unbounded Categories 1993 Leiden E. J. Brill

SchilbrackKevin “Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch” Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Metaphysical Theology and Ethics 2009 November 48 4 399 413 2009

SchilbrackKevin “Religions: Are There Any?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 December 78 4 1112 1138 2010

SchmittFredrick Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality 2003 Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield

SearleJohn R. The Construction of Social Reality 1995 New York The Free Press

SearleJohn R. “Why Should You Believe It?” The New York Review of Books 2009 Sept. 4 56 14 88 92

SegalRobert “Classification and Comparison in the Study of Religion: The Work of Jonathan Z. Smith” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2005 December 73 4 1175 1188

SlingerlandEdward “Conceptual Metaphor Theory as Methodology for Comparative Religion” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2004 March 72 1 1 31

SmartNinian Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs 1996 Berkeley University of California Press

SmithChristian Moral Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture 2003 Oxford University Press

SmithJonathan Z. TaylorMark C. “Religion, Religions, Religious” Critical Terms for Religious Studies 1998 Chicago The University of Chicago Press

SmithWilfred Cantwell EliadeMirceaKitagawaJoseph M. “Comparative Religion: Whither—and Why?” The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology 1959 Chicago University of Chicago Press

SmithWilfred Cantwell The Meaning and End of Religion 1962 Minneapolis Fortress

SnyderSamuel “New Streams of Religion: Fly Fishing as a Lived, Religion of Nature” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2007 December 75 4 896 922

StowersStanley BraunWilliMcCutcheonRussell T. “The Ontology of Religion” Introducing Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith 2009 London Equinox

TaylorCharles Sources of the Self 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

WeibeDonald The Politics of Religious Studies 2000 Palgrave Macmillan

WebbMark Owen “An Eliminativist Theory of Religion” Sophia 2009 February 48 1 35 42

YingerJ. Milton The Scientific Study of Religion 1970 New York Macmillan

10

Robert Segal (2005) also makes this argument.

11

Latour says before 1882when the tuberculosis bacillus was discovered “the bacillus had no real existence.” For the ridicule see Boghossian; Searle 2009.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 93 93 39
Full Text Views 123 123 91
PDF Downloads 12 12 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0