This is an introduction to the commissioned set of papers in reply to Aaron Hughes’s assessment of the current state of Islamic studies within the academic study of religion.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
I still have Lincoln’s May 8, 1995, letter to Oxford University Press, which evaluated the submission that became my first book, Manufacturing Religion. He concludes that letter to the editor by stating the following in a postscript (and I quote this with Lincoln’s permission): As you probably remember, it’s my standard practice to waive confidentiality, given my view that critical opinions are not detachable from the persons who offer them, not from the positions those people occupy and the life histories they have traversed. Those called upon to respond can do so more knowledgeably when they know from whence the criticisms originate, so that they engage human beings and not just words on paper.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 227 | 12 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 144 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 52 | 2 | 0 |
This is an introduction to the commissioned set of papers in reply to Aaron Hughes’s assessment of the current state of Islamic studies within the academic study of religion.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 227 | 12 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 144 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 52 | 2 | 0 |