In the aftermath of September 11, the academic study of Islam has been one of the most sought-after areas of academic expertise throughout North America. The result is that many departments of Religious Studies have been eager either to develop or increase existing offerings in all things Islamic and Arabic. This strikes me as a good a time as any to reflect upon the nature of the relationship between Religious Studies and Islamic Studies. This article assumes that the integration of the latter into the former has not been easy or even successful. It provocatively argues that some of the manifold reasons behind such tensions emerge from the apologetics—found among both Muslim and non-Muslim scholars—inherent to the study of Islam. This confessionalism is the result of a complex amalgam of academic and non-academic forces.
AdamsCharles J.KitagawaJoseph M.EliadeMirceaLongCharles H.“The history of religions and the study of Islam.”The History of Religions: Essays on the Problem of Understanding1967ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press177193
McCutcheonRussell T.“ ‘It’s a lie. There’s no truth in it! It’s a sin!’: On the limits of the humanistic study of religion and the costs of saving others from themselves,”Journal of the American Academy of Religion2006743720750
SimmonsGwendolyn ZoharahSafiOmid“Are we up to the challenge?: The need for a radical re-ordering of the Islamic discourses on women.”Progressive Muslims: On Justice Gender and Pluralism2003OxfordOneworld235248