This paper offers a diagnosis as to why NAASR’s identity has become more ambiguous over the past decade (i.e., the appropriation of postmodernism to authorize polemical positions) and offers a proposal on how the more precise definition of this journal’s key terms—method and theory—might assist the association to provide a hospitable home for two different groups of scholars who are equally alienated from the field’s dominant form.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abeysekara Ananda The un-translatability of religion, the un-translatability of life: Thinking Talal Asad’s thought unthought in the study of religion Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2011 23 3-4 257 282
Allen Charlotte Is nothing sacred? Casting out the demons from religious studies Lingua Franca 1996 6/7 30 40
Arnal William E. What if I don’t want to play tennis?: A rejoinder to Russell McCutcheon on postmodernism and theory of religion Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 1998 27 1 61 66
Arnal William & Braun Willi Arnal W. , Braun W. & McCutcheon The irony of religion Failure and Nerve in the Academic Study of Religion: Essays in Honor of Donald Wiebe 2012 Sheffield Equinox 231 238
Eliade Mircea & Kitagawa Joseph M. The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology 1959 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Green Garrett Challenging the religious studies canon: Karl Barth’s theory of religion Journal of Religion 1995 75 473 486
MacKendrick Kenneth G. The aporetics of a tennis-playing brontosaurus, or a critical theory of religion: A rejoinder to Russell T. McCutcheon and William E. Arnal Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 1999 28 1 77 83
Martin Luther H. & Wiebe Donald Religious studies as a scientific discipline: The persistence of a delusion Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2012 80 3 587 597
McCutcheon Russell T. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia 1997 New York Oxford University Press
McCutcheon Russell T. Returning the volley to William E. Arnal Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 1998 27 1 67 68
McCutcheon Russell T. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion 2001 Albany, NY State University of New York Press
McCutcheon Russell T. Braun W. & McCutcheon R. T. Introducing Smith Introducing Smith: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith 2008 London Equinox 1 17
McCutcheon Russell T. Boer Roland How to give up the bible and learn to love it again. Respondent, Review Panel on Secularism and Biblical Studies 2011 Society of Biblical Literature, San Francisco (November 20).
McCutcheon Russell T. A direct question deserves a direct answer: A reply to Atalia Omer’s ‘Can a critic be a caretaker too?’ Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2012 80 4 1077 1082
Omer Atalia Can a critic be a caretaker too? Religion, conflict, and conflict transformation Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2011 79 459 496
Smith Jonathan Z. Sacred persistence: Toward a redescription of canon Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown 1982 Chicago University of Chicago Press 36 52
Smith Jonathan Z. Bible and religion Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion 2000 29 87 93
Smith Jonathan Z. Religion and bible Journal of Biblical Literature 2009 128 1 5 27
Swift Jonathan A modest proposal A Modest Proposal and Other Writings (2009) [1729] London Penguin 230 239 C. Fabricant (ed. and intro.)
See Arnal 1998, McCutcheon 1998, and also MacKendrick 1999 for the discussion that followed on the original publication of this essay.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 61 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 10 | 0 |
This paper offers a diagnosis as to why NAASR’s identity has become more ambiguous over the past decade (i.e., the appropriation of postmodernism to authorize polemical positions) and offers a proposal on how the more precise definition of this journal’s key terms—method and theory—might assist the association to provide a hospitable home for two different groups of scholars who are equally alienated from the field’s dominant form.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 61 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 10 | 0 |