Many contemporary scholars believe that all experience is dependent upon language and culture, meaning that it is unintelligible to speak of some cross-cultural event which can be called “mystical” or “religious”; and that the notion of the origins of religious beliefs lying in such experiences is thus methodologically and theoretically unsound. Challenges to these perspectives leave one open to charges of naivety, or of having crossed a boundary from the (ostensibly) objective Study of Religions into a kind of universalist crypto-theology. In defense of the study of such experiences, this article attempts to demonstrate the weaknesses in these arguments by showing that they are based upon a number of mutually-reliant but unproven culturally-situated philosophical axioms. With particular reference to near-death and out-of-body experiences, a reflexive, theoretically eclectic approach to this area of study is suggested.
BrébeufJ.HunterJ.M.ThwaitiesR.B.Relation of What Occurred in the Country of the Hurons in the Year 1636Travels and Explorations of the Jesuit Missionaries in New France1636vol. XClevelandBurrows Brothers(1897)
FogesP.An atheist meets the Masters of the UniverseLapham’s Quarterly2010March8accessed June 6 2013http://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/roundtable/an-atheist-meets-the-masters-of-the-universe.php
SharfR.TaylorM.C.ExperienceCritical Terms in Religious Studies1998ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press94115(Reprinted as: The rhetoric of experience and the study of religion. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7[11-12] : 267-87)
ShushanG.Rehabilitating the neglected “similar”: Confronting the issue of cross-cultural similarities in the Study of ReligionsParanthropology: Journal of Anthropological Approaches to the Paranormal2013April424853