Religious Symbolism and the Human Mind

Rethinking Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The purpose of this paper is to assess Durkheim’s approach to religion and the validity of the time-honoured principle of the social determination of mental representations. The thesis to be defended is that Durkheim was essentially right in understanding religious ritual as a symbolic language. But he was wrong both in his social deterministic theory of mental representations and in his definition of religion as an exclusively social phenomenon. As current evolutionary sciences have amply demonstrated, human mental architecture has been shaped by a long evolutionary process and cannot be easily reconfigured through cultural indoctrination. Two consequences can be derived from this. First, religious ideas can successfully colonise human minds thanks to their ability to parasitize on biologically evolved human cognitive structures. Second, due to their counterintuitive properties, this colonisation can only succeed if those ideas are culturally transmitted through a special language.

Religious Symbolism and the Human Mind

Rethinking Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Sections

References

BanerkeeKonikaBloomPaul Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief Trends in Cognitive Science 2013 17 1 7 8

BellahRobert Religion in Human Evolution 2011 Cambridge, M.A. Harvard University Press

BoyerPascal Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought 2001 New York Basic Books

CarruthersMichaelLaurenceStephenStichStephen The Innate Mind. Structure and Contents 2005 Oxford Oxford University Press

DayMartin Religion, off-line cognition and the extended mind Journal of Cognition and Culture 2004 4 1 101 121

DurkheimEmile Elementary Forms of Religious Life 1915 London George Allen and Unwin

DurkheimEmileMaussMarcel Primitive Classifications 1963 London Routledge and Kegan

GellAlfred The Anthropology of Time 1992 Oxford Berg

GervaisWill M.WillardAiyana K.NorenzayanAranHenrichJoseph The cultural transmission of faith. Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief Religion 2011 41 3 389 410

HauserMarc D. Moral Minds. How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong 2006 New York HarperCollins

KantImmanuel Critique of Pure Reason 2007 London Penguin

LukesStephen Durkheim. His Life and Work 1985 Stanford Stanford University Press

McCauleyRobert Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not 2011 New York Oxford University Press

Radcliffe-BrownAlfred R. Structure and Function in Primitive Society 1952 New York The Free Press

RicoeurPaul Freud and Philosophy. An Essay on Interpretation 1970 London Yale University Press

SalazarCarles Anthropology and the cognitive science of religion: A critical assessment Religion and Society 2010 1 44 56

SkorupskiJohn Symbol and Theory. A Philosophical Study of Theories of Religion in Social Anthropology 1976 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

SperberDan Rethinking Symbolism 1975 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

WittgensteinLudwig Remarks of Frazer’s Golden Bough 1979 Nottinghamshire Brynmill Press

2

See Gell (1992) for a sound critique of relativistic understandings of time.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 18
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 5 5 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0