Teaching by Production Rather Than Products
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Nathan R.B. Loewen in
Current site
Google Scholar
The classroom has potential to be the most common context for the dissemination of method and theory in religious studies. Scholars have the ability to perform scholarly competencies in their teaching venues such as providing evidentiary support, taking stock of methodological concerns, and demonstrating familiarity with current trends in criticism within the field, just to name a few. Those who take seriously critical moves in the field, furthermore, might see the dialogical self-consciousness and an attention to structures to be shared primary interests for critical theory and contemporary pedagogy. All too often, and problematically, the competencies applied in scholarship are separated from teaching. Research is seen as “real work” (e.g., publications and conference papers) and, for many, teaching merely serves those practical ends. With this problematic dichotomy in mind, the publishing of The Norton Anthology of World Religions (nawr) is sadly not surprising in the year 2015. When critical scholarship is withheld from pedagogical tools (like an anthology), the demonstrable lack of scholarly competency and disciplinary aptitude in Jack Miles’ preface and introduction to the nawr remains unremarkable (particularly since he claims to address religious studies undergraduates and their professors). Miles not only presents the nawr as a means by which “international world religions should be allowed to speak to you in their own words” (Miles 2015: li) but he also prescribes—as supposedly prior to theoretical commitments—the method of “secular, neutral comparative study of religion” (41) through the “fine art of page flipping” (lvii) as the original and best practice for the study of religion. Miles’ failures as a critic and as a pedagogue merely reflect the presumption that students need only interact with the superstructures of higher education and not be let in on the processes that create scholarship. This essay will outline this problematic vis-à-vis the preface and introduction to the nawr in order to highlight the role a critical study of religion should play in our teaching.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Friere Paulo Pedagogy of the Oppressed 2000 30th ed New York Continuum
-
Hunt Lynn , Jacob Margaret C. & Mijnhardt Wijnand The Book That Changed Europe: Picart and Bernard’s “Religious Ceremonies of the World.” 2010 Cambridge Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
-
Kinnard Jacob N. Norton anthology of world religions Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2015 83 2 591 596
-
Loewen Nathan Effective Social Learning: a Collaborative, Globally-Networked Pedagogy 2015 Minneapolis Fortress Press
-
Masuzawa Tomoku The Invention of World Religions, Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism 2005 Chicago University of Chicago Press
-
Pals Daniel L. Eight Theories of Religion 2006 2nd edition New York Oxford University Press
-
Picart Bernard & Bernard Jean-Frédéric The Origins of Comparative Religion: Bernard and Picart’s Religious Ceremonies and Customs of All the Peoples of the World (1723-1743) Accessed October 5, 2015 University of California at Los Angeles Digital Library Program. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/picart/introduction.html
-
Smith Jonathan Z. McCutcheon Russell T. The necessary lie: Duplicity in the disciplines Studying Religion: An Introduction 2007 Oakville Equinox Press 74 80
-
Smith Jonathan Z. Lehrich Christopher I. Religious studies: Whither (wither) and why? On Teaching Religion: Essays by Jonathan Z. Smith 1995 New York Oxford University Press 64 72
-
Smith Jonathan Z. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity 1990 Chicago University of Chicago Press
-
Schilbrack Kevin Religions: Are there any? Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 78 4 1112 1138
-
Stausberg Michael Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion 2009 London Routledge
-
Stommel Jesse Critical pedagogy: A definition Hybrid Pedagogy 2014 Accessed October 5, 2015 18 November 2014. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/critical-digital-pedagogy-definition/
-
Wiggins Grant P. & McTighe Jay Understanding by Design 2009 2nd edition Alexandria Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 2005
-
Zeller Benjamin “But aren’t cults bad?”: Active learning, productive chaos, and teaching new religious movements Teaching Theology and Religion 2015 18 2 121 132
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 960 | 161 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 186 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 5 | 0 |
Teaching by Production Rather Than Products
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Nathan R.B. Loewen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The classroom has potential to be the most common context for the dissemination of method and theory in religious studies. Scholars have the ability to perform scholarly competencies in their teaching venues such as providing evidentiary support, taking stock of methodological concerns, and demonstrating familiarity with current trends in criticism within the field, just to name a few. Those who take seriously critical moves in the field, furthermore, might see the dialogical self-consciousness and an attention to structures to be shared primary interests for critical theory and contemporary pedagogy. All too often, and problematically, the competencies applied in scholarship are separated from teaching. Research is seen as “real work” (e.g., publications and conference papers) and, for many, teaching merely serves those practical ends. With this problematic dichotomy in mind, the publishing of The Norton Anthology of World Religions (nawr) is sadly not surprising in the year 2015. When critical scholarship is withheld from pedagogical tools (like an anthology), the demonstrable lack of scholarly competency and disciplinary aptitude in Jack Miles’ preface and introduction to the nawr remains unremarkable (particularly since he claims to address religious studies undergraduates and their professors). Miles not only presents the nawr as a means by which “international world religions should be allowed to speak to you in their own words” (Miles 2015: li) but he also prescribes—as supposedly prior to theoretical commitments—the method of “secular, neutral comparative study of religion” (41) through the “fine art of page flipping” (lvii) as the original and best practice for the study of religion. Miles’ failures as a critic and as a pedagogue merely reflect the presumption that students need only interact with the superstructures of higher education and not be let in on the processes that create scholarship. This essay will outline this problematic vis-à-vis the preface and introduction to the nawr in order to highlight the role a critical study of religion should play in our teaching.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 960 | 161 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 186 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 5 | 0 |