“The Very Act of Cutting”

Ethnomethodology, Interaction and the Emic–Etic Debate

In: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Till Mostowlansky University of Bern, Institut für Religionswissenschaft Lerchenweg 36, p.o. Box 3000 Bern 9 Switzerland

Search for other papers by Till Mostowlansky in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In the course of the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s, two complexes—insider–outsider and emic–etic—have increasingly become entangled. Taken against this backdrop, this article argues that ethnomethodology provides a methodological and epistemological outlook on these two complexes that can support efforts to disentangle them. Based on the discussion of ethnomethodological studies, I trace this outlook back to ethnomethodology’s focus on observable social interaction as dynamic, situational, and directed toward the public. This focus rejects the preoccupation with what is going on “inside people’s heads,” and thus underlines the methodological and epistemological redundancy of the insider–outsider distinction. Finally, I maintain that ethnomethodology and the majority of strands within the scientific study of religion\s are jointly rooted in an emic standpoint that concentrates on the study of specific contexts and interactions, and seeks to avoid generalized a priori classifications.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 448 86 6
Full Text Views 282 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 107 25 2