Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Craig Martin accuses me of repeating the mistakes of perennialism, perpetuating an irresponsible and covertly theological approach to research that rushes to identify dubious “similarities” in religious experience across culture and history. While it is true that I identify cross-cultural similarities in the accounts of mystical experience that I examine in Zen and the Unspeakable God, that argument is based on historical evidence, and does not imply the questionable theological conclusions for which classical perennialism has been criticized. Learning from the mistakes of perennialism does not mean dismissing comparison as an illegitimate enterprise or rejecting cross-cultural similarities as prima facie impossible; it means insisting on evidentially-grounded and historically sensitive research that is willing and able to identify both differences and similarities. It also means resisting the temptation to oversimplify our task by reducing all research on religion to one preferred analytical category.

Comparison and the Spectre of Perennialism: A Reply to Craig Martin

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Sections

References

BlumJason (2012). Radical empiricism and the unremarkable nature of mystic ineffability. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24.3: 119.

BlumJason (2014). The science of consciousness and mystical experience: An argument for radical empiricism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82.1: 150173.

BlumJason (2015). Zen and the Unspeakable God. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

BushStephen (2014). Visions of Religion: Experience Meaning and Power. New York: Oxford University Press2014.

MartinCraig (2017). Yes, … but …”: The neo-perennialists. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 19.2.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 16 16 10
Full Text Views 83 83 60
PDF Downloads 9 9 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0