Proposals that god-belief is an innate capacity of all humanity have not been confirmed by empirical studies. Scientific disciplines presently lean against god-belief’s innateness. Perhaps religion should be relieved that belief in gods is not innate. Intuitive cognitive functions supporting god-belief offer little convergence upon any god. Religious pluralism back to the Stone Age displays no consensus either. Any cognition for god-belief can only be deemed as mostly or entirely misleading. Theology has tried to forestall that skeptical judgment, by dictating what counts as authentic religiosity and who enjoys a valid idea of god. Justin Barrett exemplifies this theological interference with scientific inquiry. Contorting the anthropology and cognitive science of religion too far, his quest for a primal natural religion won’t match up with his search for intuitive conceptions of god. His quest for god-belief’s innateness devolves into theological dogmatism, deepening doubts that scientific theories of religion will validate god-belief.
AtranScott and JosephHenrich (2010). The Evolution of Religion: How Cognitive By-products, Adaptive Learning Heuristics, Ritual Displays, and Group Competition Generate Deep Commitments to Prosocial Religions. Biological Theory5(1) pp. 18-30.
KirkpatrickLee A. (2006). Religion is Not an Adaptation. In P.McNamara ed. Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion. Westport, Conn.: Praeger pp. 159-179.
LindemanMarjaanaAnnika M.Svedholm-Häkkinen and JariLipsanen (2015). Ontological Confusions but not Mentalizing Abilities Predict Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Supernatural Purpose. Cognition134(January) pp. 63-76.
ThurowJoshua (2013). Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion74(1) pp. 77-98.