Studying Religion and Trying Theological Applications

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



John Shook’s paper Are People Born to be Believers? raises many questions, for the scientific study of religion and for philosophy and theology. For reasons of convenience this response distinguishes in the target article between three quite different issues and deals with them separately: first issue concerns the supposed innateness of religious beliefs, or some precursor of them; second, the possible theological application that such thesis could entail; and third, a more general and methodological issue, concerns the feasibility of a scientific knowledge about religion that can be disentangled from other sources of religious insight

Studying Religion and Trying Theological Applications

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion



BoyerPascal (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious ThoughtNew York: Basic Books.

ColagèIvan (2016). The Cultural Evolution of Language: Insights from Recent Hypothesis, ESSSAT News & Reviews. 26 (2) pp. 5-18.

DennettDaniel (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenonNew York: Penguin Books.

DorDaniel & Eva Jablonka (2014). Why We Need to Move From Gene–Culture Co-Evolution to Culturally-Driven Co-Evolution.” In Daniel DorChris Knight & Jerome Lewis eds. Social Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 15-30.

FeiermanJay (2009). The Evolutionary History of Religious Behavior In Jay Feierman ed. The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and ReligionSanta Barbara, CA: ABC- Clio pp. 71-86.

JackAntony IanJared P. FriedmanRichard E. BoyatzisScott N. Taylor (2016). Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief, Analytic Thinking, Mentalizing and Moral Concern. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149989. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149989.

JonesJames W (2015). Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2015.

KundtRadek (2015). Contemporary Evolutionary Theories of Culture and the Study of Religion. London, New York: Bloomsbury.

LewensTim (2015). Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

MameliMatteo & Patrick Bateson (2011). An Evaluation of the Concept of Innateness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 366 pp. 436-443.

MurphyNancey (1990). Theology in the Age of Scientific ReasoningIthaca, NY, London: Cornell University Press.

OviedoLluis & Manuel Canteras (2013). Steps Towards a “Universal Religious Grammar”Antonianum 88 (3) pp. 531-553.

OviedoLluis (2015). Religious Cognition as a Dual-Process: Developing the Model. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 27 (1) pp. 31-58.

PinkerSteven (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human NatureNew York: Penguin Books.

VallortigaraGiorgio (2016). In Search for the Animacy Detector in the Brain: Biological Predispositions to Detect Animated Entities and its Implication for Believing. Unpublished paper delivered at the Seminary on “Believing between Theology and Neuroscience”Antonianum UniversityRome6-8 June 2016.

VisalaAku (2011). Naturalism Theism and the Cognitive Study of Religion: Religion Explained? Farnham UK, Burlington VT: Ashgate.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 16 16 4
Full Text Views 71 71 55
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0