Prolegomena to a Philosophical Phenomenology of Religion

A Critique of Sociological Phenomenology

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to deal with a slightly erroneous claim made in previous research that philosophical phenomenology has shown little interest in the topic of “religion”. The majority of this article deals with the branch of the Movement that I have dubbed Sociological Phenomenology which stems out of the work of Alfred Schutz and Max Scheler and has influenced scholars of religion like Peter Berger, Thomas Luckmann and James Spickard. I offer a Husserlian critique of this branch of phenomenology for failing to appreciate the key insights of his later phenomenology’s “ontological turn” where he turned to an analysis on the natural attitude and the life-world. I conclude by showing what a phenomenology or religion consistent with these later insights may look like.

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Journal of the North American Association for the Study of Religion

Sections

References

Barber, M. 2013. “Alfred Schutz and the Problem of Empathy”. Husserl’s Ideen, ed. by L. Embree and T. Nenon, 313-326. London: Springer.

Becker, H. and Dahlke, H. 1942. “Max Scheler’s Sociology of Knowledge”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2: 310-322.

Beckford, J. 2003. Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bellah, R. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution. London: Harvard University Press.

Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

Berger, P. 1990. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.

Bulliet, R. 2004. The Case for Islamo-Christian Civilisation. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Carrette, J. and King, D. 2005. Selling Spirituality. London: Routledge.

Csordas, T. 1990. “Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology”. Ethos 18: 5-47.

Csordas, T. 1994. The Sacred Self: A Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic Healing. London: University of California Press.

Csordas, T. 1995. “Words from the Holy People: A Case Study in Cultural Phenomenology”. In Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self, 269-290.

Csordas, T. 1997. Language, Charisma, and Creativity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Csordas, T. 2002. Body/Meaning/Healing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Davies, W. 1983. “Japanese Religious Affiliations: Motives and Obligations”. Sociological Analysis 44: 131-146.

Duranti, A. 2010. “Husserl, Intersubjectivity and Anthropology”. Anthropological Theory 10: 1-20.

Embree, L. (ed.) 1997. Encyclopedia of Phenomenology. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Embree, L. 2001. “The continuation of Phenomenology: a fifth period?”. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 1: 1-9.

Embree, L. 2015. The Schutzian Theory of the Cultural Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.

Embree, L. n.d. n.d.. “Continuing Husserlian Phenomenology”. In On the Future of Husserlian Phenomenology. Accessed April 25, 2013. http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/husserl/Future/Part%20One/PartOneFrames/PartOne.html.

Fitzgerald, T. 1997. “A Critique of Religion as a Cross-Cultural Category”. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 9(2): 91-110.

Fitzgerald, T. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fitzgerald, T. 2010. “ ‘Experiences deemed religious’: Radical critique or temporary fix? Strategic ambiguity in Ann Taves’ Religious Experience Reconsidered”. Religion, 40(4) 296-299.

Greil, A. 1977. “Previous Dispositions and Conversion to Perspectives of Social and Religious Movements”. Sociological Analysis 38: 115-125.

Gurwitsch, A. 1974. Phenomenology and the Theory of Science, ed. by L. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Hart, J. 1997. “Religion” in Encyclopedia of Phenomenology, ed. by L. Embree. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, E. 1965. Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, ed. and trans. by Q. Lauer. London: Harper Torchbooks.

Husserl, E. 1970. The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Husserl, E. 1981. Husserl: Shorter Works. Trans. by Q. Lauer, ed. by P. McCormick & F. Elliston. Notre Dame University of Notre Dame Press.

Husserl, E. 1988.Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. by D. Cairns. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy second book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. London: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Husserl, E. 1999. The Idea of Phenomenology. Trans. by L. Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

James, W. 1961. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Modern Library.

Janicaud, D. 2000.“The Theological Turn of French Phenomenology”. In Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn”, ed. by J. F. Courtine, trans. by B. Prusak, 16-103. New York: Fordham University Press.

Kerry, D. & Armour, K. 2000. “Sport Sciences and the Promise of Phenomenology: philosophy, method, and insight”. Quest 52: 1-17.

Koryé, A. 1943. “Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century”. The Philosophical Review 52: 333-348.

Lewis, M. and Staehler, T. 2010. Phenomenology: an Introduction. London: Routledge.

Luckmann, T. 1970. “On the Boundaries of the Social World”. In Phenomenology and Social Reality, ed. by M. Natanson, 88-121, Phenomenology and Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Martin, L. and Wiebe, D. 2012. “Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion”. Religio 20: 9-18.

Moran, D. 2012. Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moran, D. and Embree, L. (eds) 2004. Phenomenology Vol. I: Phenomenology: Central Tendencies and Concepts. London: Routledge.

Murphy, T. 2010. The Politics of Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Nietz, M. J. and Spickard, J. 1990. “Steps Towards a Sociology of Religious Experience: The Theories of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Alfred Schutz”. Sociological Analysis 51: 15-33.

Penner, H. 1989. Impasse and Resolution: A Critique of the Study of Religion. New York: Peter Lang.

Redfield, R. 1952. “The Primitive World View”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96: 30-36.

Sartre, J. P. 2003. Being and Nothingness. Trans. by H. Barnes, preface by R. Eyre, intro. by M. Warnock. London: Routledge.

Schechner, R. 1993. The Future of Ritual: Writings on Culture and Performance. London: Routledge.

Scheler, M. 1954. On The Nature of Sympathy. Trans. by P. Heath, intro. by W. Stark. London: Routledge.

Scheler, M. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Trans. by M. Frings & R. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Scheler, M. 1978. “On the Idea of Man”. Journal for the British Society of Phenomenology 9(3): 184-198.

Scheler, M. 1980. Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge. Trans. by M. Frings, intro. by K. Stikkers. London: Routledge.

Scheler, M. 2009. The Human Place in the Cosmos. Trans. by M. Frings, intro by E. Kelly. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Scheler, M. 2010. On the Eternal in Man. Trans. by B. Noble, intro. by G. McAleer. London: Transaction Publishers.

Schutz, A. 1962. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, ed. by M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Schutz, A. 1964. Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, ed. by A. Brodersen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Schutz, A. 2004. “Positivistc philosophy and the actual approach of interpretative social science: an ineditum of Alfred Schutz from spring 1953” In Phenomenology Vol. III, ed. by D. Moran and L. Embree, 119-145. London: Routledge.

Smart, N. 2009. Ninian Smart on World Religious Volume 1: Religious Experience and Philosophical Analysis, ed. by J. Shepherd. Farnham: Ashgate.

Spickard, J. 1991. “Experiencing Religious Rituals: A Schutzian Analysis of Navajo Ceremonies”. Sociological Analysis 52(2): 191-204.

Spickard, J. 2002. “On the Epistemology of Post-Colonial Ethnography”. In Personal Knowledge and Beyond, ed. by J. Spikard, S. Landres, and M. McQuire, 237-252. London: New York University Press.

Spickard, J. 2005. “Ritual, Symbol and Experience: Understanding Catholic Worker House Masses”. Sociology of Religion 66(4): 337-357.

Spickard, J. 2010. “Does Taves reconsider experience enough? A critical commentary on religious experience reconsidered”. Religion, 40(4): 311-313.

Spickard, J. 2011. “Phenomenology”. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler, 333-345. London: Routledge.

Spickard, J. 2012. “Centred in time: a sociological phenomenology of religious ritual”. In Understanding Religious Ritual: Theoretical approaches and innovations, ed. by J. Hoffmann, 154-167. London: Routledge.

Spiegelberg, H. 1982. The Phenomenological Movement: Third revised and enlarged edition. The Hague: Matinus Nijhoff.

Staehler, T. 2007. “Introduction”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15: 325-326.

Taves, A. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Tuckett, J. 2014. “Alfred Schutz’s Postulates of Social Science: Clarifications and Amendments”. Human Studies 37(4): 469-488.

Tuckett, J. 2015a. “The Prejudice of Being Human in the Study of Non-Ordinary Realities”. Diskus 17(2): http://dx.doi.org/10.18792/diskus.v17i2.69.

Tuckett, J. 2015b. “Levels of Intersubjectivity: Scheler’s ‘Idea of Man’ and Schutz’s Human Prejudice”. Schutzian Research 7: 105-128.

Tuckett, J. 2016a. “Clarifying Phenomenologies in the Study of Religion: separating Kristensen and van der Leeuw from Otto and Eliade”. Religion 46(1): 75-101.

Tuckett, J. 2016b. “Kendo: Between ‘religion’ and ‘nationalism’ ”. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 15(44): 178-204.

Tuckett, J. 2016c. “Clarifying the Phenomenology of Gerardus van der Leeuw”. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 28(3): 227-263.

Tuckett, J. 2017a. “Toward a Proper Phenomenology of Religious Experience”. The Journal for the Study of Religious Experience 3(1): 23-43.

Tuckett, J. 2016d. “Science Fiction and the Ideological Definition of Religion”. Implicit Religion 19(4): 525-551.

Waldenfels, B. 2004. “Homeworld and Alienworld”. In Phenomenology Vol. IV: Expanding Horizons of Phenomenology, ed. by D. Moran and L. Embree, 280-291. London: Routledge.

Waldenfels, B. 2011. Phenomenology of the Alien. Trans. by A. Kozin and T. Staehler. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 27
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0