‘Religion’ is often, if not always, deemed a rather problematic category by critical theorists, who urge scholars to be more attentive to the genealogy and history of the category. As part of the review symposium of Theory in a Time of Excess (2016), this review essay argues that ‘theory’ itself could be deemed problematic if we wish to be consistent in adopting such a critical stance, which can lead to several dead-ends when excluding other theoretical options and possibilities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Barton, Carlin A. & Daniel Boyarin (2016). Imagine No Religion: How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities. New York: Fordham University Press.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding (2014). What is Religion? London and New York: Routledge.
Mikalson, Jon D. (2016). New Aspects of Religion in Ancient Athens: Honors, Authorities, Esthetics, and Society. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
Nongbri, Brent (2013). Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Roubekas, Nickolas P. (2017). Review of Carlin A. Barton and Daniel Boyarin: Imagine No Religion. How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities. Critical Research on Religion 5 (2), pp. 217-221.
Rutherford, Ian (2013). State Pilgrims and Sacred Observers in Ancient Greece: A Study of Theōriā and Theōroi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taves, Ann (2009). Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 330 | 63 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 244 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 107 | 11 | 0 |
‘Religion’ is often, if not always, deemed a rather problematic category by critical theorists, who urge scholars to be more attentive to the genealogy and history of the category. As part of the review symposium of Theory in a Time of Excess (2016), this review essay argues that ‘theory’ itself could be deemed problematic if we wish to be consistent in adopting such a critical stance, which can lead to several dead-ends when excluding other theoretical options and possibilities.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 330 | 63 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 244 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 107 | 11 | 0 |