Objectivity Discourse, the Protestant Secular, and the Decolonization of Religious Studies
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Travis Warren Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article documents a complex genealogy of objectivity discourse that has shaped the study of religion in the modern academy. Analyzing data derived from a 2015 survey administered to Big 10, Research 1, and Ivy League religious studies institutions in the United States, the study posits a provisional taxonomy of neutrality language. The debates about positionality and self-disclosure in religion classrooms, as explored in the taxonomy, is evidence of the pervasive epistemic framework of the “Protestant secular.” The article proposes that religious studies, as a hybrid discipline, may address the status of the academy as an agent of the secular state by acknowledging its complicity in regimes of power and engaging in the rigorously critical, robustly ethnographic, and concertedly reflexive study of its own institutions and practices. Rather than removing objectivity discourse from religious studies, the article concludes by arguing for retaining a modified form of objectivist realism as a productive, decolonized ideal.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Allen, Jafari Sinclaire, and Ryan Cecil Jobson (2016). The decolonizing generation: (Race and) theory in Anthropology since the eighties. Current Anthropology 57 (2), pp. 129-148.
-
Alles, Gregory D., ed. (2008). Religious Studies: A Global View. New York: Routledge.
-
Ammerman, Nancy T. (2016). Lived religion as an emerging field: An assessment of its contours and frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 29 (2), pp. 83-99.
-
Arweck, Elisabeth, and Martin D. Stringer, eds. (2002). Theorizing Faith: The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Ritual. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham University Press.
-
Asad, Talal, ed. (1988). Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
-
Asad, Talal (1999). Religion, nation-state, secularism. In: Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lehmann, eds., Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 178-196.
-
Baehr, Peter, ed. (2000). The Portable Hannah Arendt. New York: Penguin Books.
-
Bagger, Matthew (2018). Normativity, truth and philosophy of religion. Syndicate. https://syndicate.network/symposia/theology/why-philosophy-matters-for-the-study-of-religion-and-vice-versa/. Accessed October 11, 2018.
-
Bayart, Jean-François (2005). The Illusion of Cultural Identity. Steven Rendall, Janet Roitman and Jonathan Derrick, trans. London: Hurst & Company.
-
Bell, Catherine (1996). Modernism and postmodernism in the study of religions. Religious Studies Review 22 (3), pp. 179-190.
-
Benavides, Gustavo (1998). Modernity. In: Mark C. Taylor, ed., Critical Terms for Religious Studies, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 186-204.
-
Bender, Courtney (2016). How and why to study up: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Broadacre City and the study of lived religion. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 29 (2), pp. 100-116.
-
Bernard, H. Russell (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. 5th edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
-
Bielo, James (2013). Introduction: Writing religion. In: Hillary K. Crane and Deana L. Weibel, eds., Missionary Impositions: Conversion, Resistance, and Other Challenges to Objectivity in Religious Ethnography, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 1-10.
-
Blankholm, Joseph (2017). The ghost of immanentism. The Immanent Frame. https://tif.ssrc.org/2017/11/14/the-ghost-of-immanentism/. Accessed December 20, 2018.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre, Jean-Claude Passeron and Monique de Saint Martin (with contributions by Christian Baudelot and Guy Vincent) (1994). Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professional Power. Richard Teese, trans. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Cabezón, José Ignacio (2004). Identity and the work of the scholar. In: José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney, eds., Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, pp. 1-23.
-
Cabezón, José Ignacio, and Sheila Greeve Davaney (2004). Introduction. In: José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney, eds., Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, pp. 43-59.
-
Cady, Linell E., and Delwin Brown (2002). Introduction. In: Linell E. Cady and Delwin Brown, eds., Religious Studies, Theology, and the University: Conflicting Maps, Changing Terrain, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 1-12.
-
Calhoun, Craig, Mark Juergensmeyer and Jonathan VanAntwerpen (2011). Introduction. In: Craig Calhoun, Mark Juergensmeyer and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds., Rethinking Secularism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-30.
-
Calhoun, Craig (2010). Rethinking secularism. The Hedgehog Review 12 (3), pp. 35-48.
-
Capps, Walter H (1995). Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
-
Casanova, José (2011). The secular, secularizations, and secularisms. In: Craig Calhoun, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds., Rethinking Secularism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 54-74.
-
Chaves, Mark (2011). American Religion: Contemporary Trends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Cotter, Christopher R., and David G. Robinson, eds. (2016). After World Religions: Reconstructing Religious Studies. New York: Routledge.
-
Cooper, Travis Warren (2017). Taxonomy construction and the normative turn in religious studies. Religions 8, pp. 1-15.
-
Cooper, Travis Warren (2018). The uncanniness of missionary others: A discursive analysis of a century of anthropological writings on missionary ethnographers. Religion and Society: Advances in Research 9 (2018), pp. 68-85.
-
Cox, Harvey (1971). The Secular City. New York: The MacMillan Company.
-
Crane, Hilary K., and Deana L. Weibel (eds.) (2013). Missionary Impositions: Conversion, Resistance, and Other Challenges to Objectivity in Religious Ethnography. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
-
Curtis, Finbarr (2012). The study of American religions: critical reflections on a specialization. Religion 42 (3), pp. 355-372.
-
Curtis, Finbarr (2015). It’s not the size of the tent; It’s how it’s constructed. Leviathan and You: A Blog about Big Things. http://leviathanandyou.blogspot.com/2015/10/its-not-size-of-tentits-how-its.html. Accessed September 28, 2016.
-
Curtis, Finbarr (2016). The Production of American Religious Freedom. New York: New York University Press.
-
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
-
Deal, William H., and Timothy K. Beal (2004). Theory for Religious Studies. New York: Routledge.
-
Durdin, Andrew (2018). Death, taxes, and the problem of religious self-disclosure in the classroom. The Craft of Teaching in the Academic Study of Religion. https://craftofteachingreligion.wordpress.com/2018/10/08/death-taxes-and-the-problem-of-religious-self-disclosure-in-the-classroom/. Accessed October 10, 2018.
-
Eck, Diana (2002). A New Religious America: How a “Christian Country” Has Become the World’s Most Religiously Diverse Nation. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
-
Elliott, Scott S., ed. (2013). Reinventing Religious Studies: Key Writings in the History of a Discipline. Bristol, CT: Acumen.
-
Fessenden, Tracy (2007). Culture and Redemption: Religion, the Secular, and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Fitzgerald, Timothy (2000). The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Freeman, Samuel (2007). Rawls. New York: Routledge.
-
Griffith, R. Marie (2000). God’s Daughters: Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Thomas Burger, trans. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Habermas, Jürgen (2011). “The political”: The rational meaning of a questionable inheritance of political theology. In: Judith Butler, Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor and Cornel West, eds., The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 15-33.
-
Hansen, Phillip (1993). Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
-
Hart, D.G. (1999). The University Gets Religion: Religious Studies in American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
-
Hart, D.G. (2004). Deconstructing Evangelicalism: Conservative Protestantism in the Age of Billy Graham. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
-
Hartigan, John Jr.. (2015). Race in the 21st Century: Ethnographic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Herberg, Will (1960). Protestant—Catholic—Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
-
Hitchens, Christopher (2007). God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve.
-
Howkins, Kenneth G. (1972). The Challenge of Religious Studies. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
-
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman (2008). The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman (2015). Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Imhoff, Sarah (2016). The creation story, or how we learned to stop worrying and love Schempp. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 84 (2), pp. 466-497.
-
Jeffries, Stuart (2016). Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School. London and New York: Verso.
-
Jørgensen, J. Normann, and Kasper Juffermans (2011). Languaging. https://www.academia.edu/1808400/Languaging. Accessed December 4, 2015.
-
Josephson-Storm, Jason Ā (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Joshi, Khyati (2017). Diversity, pluralism, secularism. Unpublished paper presented at Religion and American Culture 5th Biennial Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana, 42-43. https://raac.iupui.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Proceedings2017.pdf.
-
Karabel, Jerome (2002). Revolutionary contradictions: Antonio Gramsci and the problem of intellectuals. In: James Martin, ed., Antonio Gramsci: Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers, Volume II: Intellectuals, Culture and the Party, London & New York: Routledge, pp. 7-52.
-
Klassen, Pamela (2017). Secular Christian power and the spiritual invention of nations. The Immanent Frame (Social Science Research Council). http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2017/06/06/secular-christian-power-and-the-spiritual-invention-of-nations/. Accessed June 12, 2017.
-
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Kuru, Ahmet T. (2009). Secularism and State Policies Toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Levene, Nancy (2012). Courses and canons in the study of religion (with continual reference to Jonathan Z. Smith). Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80 (4), pp. 998-1024.
-
Levene, Nancy (2018). Powers of Distinction: On Religion and Modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Lewis, Thomas A. (2009). The inevitability of normativity in the study of religion: Theology in religious studies. In: Darlene L. Bird and Simon G. Smith, eds., Theology and Religious Studies in Higher Education: Global Perspectives, New York: Continuum, pp. 87-98.
-
Lewis, Thomas A. (2015). Why Philosophy Matters for the Study of Religion—and Vice Versa. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Lofton, Kathryn (2015). Consider the neoliberal in American religion. In: Jan Stievermann, Philip Goff, and Detlef Junker, eds., Religion and the Marketplace in the United States, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 269-288.
-
Lofton, Kathryn (2017a). What we do, how we do it: Categories and interpretation. Unpublished paper presented at Religion and American Culture 5th Biennial Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana, 66-68. https://raac.iupui.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Proceedings2017.pdf.
-
Lofton, Kathryn (2017b). Consuming Religion. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Longino, Helen (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Longino, Helen (1996). Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In: L.H. Nelson and J. Nelson, eds., Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 39-58.
-
Marsden, George M. (1994). The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Martin, Craig (2010). Masking Hegemony: A Genealogy of Liberalism, Religion, and the Private Sphere. Oakville, CT: Equinox.
-
Martin, Craig (2016). Disambiguating normativity. https://craigmartinreligion.wordpress.com/2016/07/22/disambiguating-normativity/. Accessed September 27, 2016.
-
Masuzawa, Tomoko (2005). The Inventions of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
McCrary, Charles, and Jeffrey Wheatley (2016). The Protestant secular in the study of American religion: Reappraisal and suggestions. Religion 47 (2), pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2016.1244124.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (1997). Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (2003). The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. New York: Routledge, 2003.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (2004). “Just follow the money”: The Cold War, the humanistic study of religion, and the fallacy of insufficient cynicism.” Culture and Religion 5 (1), pp. 41-69.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (2008). The study of religion as an anthropology of credibility. In: Linell E. Cady and Delwin Brown, eds., Religious Studies, Theology, and the University: Conflicting Maps, Changing Terrain, Albany: State University of New York, pp. 13-30.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (2014). Entanglements: Marking Place in the Field of Religion. Bristol, CT: Equinox.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (ed.) (2015). Fabricating Origins. Bristol, CT: Equinox.
-
Miller, Monica R. (2015). Introduction: Culture, religion, and the fabrication of identities. In: Monica R. Miller, ed., Claiming Identity in the Study of Religion: Social and Rhetorical Techniques Examined, Bristol, CT: Equinox, pp. 1-18.
-
Minor, Robert N., and Robert D. Baird (2013). Teaching about religion at the state university: Taking the issue seriously and strictly. In: Scott S. Elliott, ed., Reinventing Religious Studies: Key Writings in the History of a Discipline, Bristol, CT: Acumen, pp. 103-110.
-
Modern, John Lardas (2011). Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Modern, John Lardas (2012). My evangelical conviction. Religion 42 (3), pp. 439-457.
-
Mundra, Anil (2017). Naturalism, normativity, and the study of religion. Religions 8, pp. 1-13.
-
Neville, Morgan, director (2018). Won’t You Be My Neighbor? Tremolo Productions. DVD. 94 minutes.
-
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2003 [1913]). The Genealogy of Morals. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
-
Nye, Malory (2017). Some thoughts on the decolonization of religious studies: Postcolonialism, decoloniality, and the cultural study of religion. Medium.com: Religion Bites. https://medium.com/religion-bites/decolonisation-of-religious-studies-993727c6d1bc, accessed October 1, 2018.
-
Orsi, Robert A. (2005). Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Prothero, Stephen (2004). Belief unbracketed: A case for the religion scholar to reveal more of where he or she is coming from. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 32 (2), pp. 10-11.
-
Prothero, Stephen, ed. (2006). A Nation of Religions: The Politics of Pluralism in Multireligious America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
-
Prothero, Stephen (2015). Liberalism vs. pluralism as models of interpretation. Unpublished paper presented at Religion and American Culture 4th Biennial Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana, 71-74.
-
Ramey, Steven W. (2015). Introduction: Writing, riting, and righting in the critical study of religion. In: Steven W. Ramey, ed., Writing Religion: The Case for the Critical Study of Religion, Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, pp. 1-13.
-
Ramey, Steven W. (2015b). Afterword: Accidental favorites: The implicit in the study of religion. In: Monica Miller, ed., Claiming Identity in the Study of Religion: Social and Rhetorical Techniques Examined, Bristol, CT: Equinox, pp. 223-238.
-
Ranganathan, Bharat (2017). Intelligibility and normativity in the study of religion. Religions 8, pp. 1-14.
-
Reiss, Julian (2014). Scientific objectivity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity/. Accessed July 1, 2016.
-
Reynolds, Rodney A., Robert Woods and Jason D. Baker (2007). Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
-
Roberts, Tyler (2013). Encountering Religion: Responsibility and Criticism after Secularism. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Rorty, Richard (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Schilbrack, Kevin (2014). Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Malden, MA: WILEY Blackwell.
-
Schmalzbauer, John (2003). People of Faith: Religious Conviction in American Journalism and Higher Education. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
-
Slater, Gary (2017). The implicit as a resource for engaging normativity in religious studies. Religions 8, pp. 1-15.
-
Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982). Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. The University of Chicago Press.
-
Smith, Jonathan Z. (1988). “Religion” and “religious studies”: No difference at all. Soundings 71, pp. 231-244.
-
Stark, Rodney (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion 60 (3), pp. 249-273.
-
Steinberger, Peter J. (2015). The Politics of Objectivity: An Essay on the Foundations of Political Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sue, Valerie M., and Lois A. Ritter (2012). Conducting Online Surveys. 2nd edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
-
Taylor, Charles (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MS: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
Taylor, Charles (2011). Western secularity. In: Craig Calhoun, Mark Juergensmeyer and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds., Rethinking Secularism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31-53.
-
Taylor, Mark C., ed. (1998). Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Taylor, Mark C. (2008). Secularism and critique. The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/04/24/secularism-and-critique/. Accessed June 12, 2017.
-
Toulmin, Stephen (1990). Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press.
-
Tweed, Thomas A. (1997). Our Lady of the Exile: Diasporic Religion at a Cuban Catholic Shrine in Miami. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Tweed, Thomas A. (ed.) (1997). Retelling U.S. Religious History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Tweed, Thomas A. (2007). Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ebook.
-
Tweed, Thomas A. (2016). Valuing the study of religion: Improving difficult dialogues within and beyond the AAR’s “big tent” (2015 AAR Presidential Address). Journal of the American Academy of Religion 84 (2), pp. 287-322.
-
Van der Veer, Peter (2014). The Modern Spirit of Asia: The Spiritual and the Secular in China and India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Wacker, Grant (2001). Heaven Below: Early Pentecostals and American Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Warner, Michael (2005). Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
-
Wells, Gordon (2007). The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity 14 (3), pp. 160-177.
-
Wenger, Tisa (2009). We Have a Religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious Freedom. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Wenger, Tisa (2017). Religious Freedom: The Contested History of an American Ideal. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
-
Westbrook, Laurel, and Aliya Saperstein (2015). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society 29 (4), pp. 534-560.
-
Whittaker, John H (2013). Neutrality in the study of religion. In: Scott S. Elliott, ed., Reinventing Religious Studies: Key Writings in the History of a Discipline, Bristol, CT: Acumen, pp. 64-68.
-
Wiebe, Donald (1999). The Politics of Religious Studies: The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
-
Wuthnow, Robert (2015). Inventing American Religion: Polls, Surveys, and the Tenuous Quest for a Nation’s Faith. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Žižek, Slavoj (2003). The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 936 | 118 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 203 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 324 | 34 | 5 |
Objectivity Discourse, the Protestant Secular, and the Decolonization of Religious Studies
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Travis Warren Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article documents a complex genealogy of objectivity discourse that has shaped the study of religion in the modern academy. Analyzing data derived from a 2015 survey administered to Big 10, Research 1, and Ivy League religious studies institutions in the United States, the study posits a provisional taxonomy of neutrality language. The debates about positionality and self-disclosure in religion classrooms, as explored in the taxonomy, is evidence of the pervasive epistemic framework of the “Protestant secular.” The article proposes that religious studies, as a hybrid discipline, may address the status of the academy as an agent of the secular state by acknowledging its complicity in regimes of power and engaging in the rigorously critical, robustly ethnographic, and concertedly reflexive study of its own institutions and practices. Rather than removing objectivity discourse from religious studies, the article concludes by arguing for retaining a modified form of objectivist realism as a productive, decolonized ideal.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 936 | 118 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 203 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 324 | 34 | 5 |