“Let’s Take the Text Seriously”
The Protectionist Doxa of Mainstream New Testament Studies
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Stephen L. Young in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Mainstream New Testament Studies is often a space of repeating, elaborating on, identifying with, or valorizing the voices of NT writings. These common features of NT Studies resemble what scholars in Religious Studies refer to as protectionism: the privileging of a source’s own claims to such an extent that interpreters let them dictate academic analysis. Through examining debates about NT sources and both Greco-Roman ethnic rhetorics and Hellenistic philosophy, this article argues that protectionism structures the doxa of mainstream NT Studies—the commonsense that shapes what is thinkable and what questions / categories feel the most obvious. The field’s protectionism often manifests itself in confused rhetoric about “taking the text seriously” and in the invalidating of scholarship that does something other than describe (i.e., “exegesis”) or elaborate upon NT writings. Protectionism thus helps explain the gendered hierarchies of knowledge in NT Studies: “exegesis” and supposedly “objective Historical-Criticism” are dominant norms that reproduce the field as a masculine dominated space. As a result, critical and redescriptive research—especially by or about women—gets passed over since it seems “niche” or “political / agenda” driven by comparison. Interrogating the protectionism of NT Studies thus permits rethinking the politics of what kinds of scholarship seem the most obvious.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Anderson, Elizabeth (1995). Feminist epistemology: An interpretation and a defense. Hypatia 10 (3), pp. 50-84.
-
Averbeck, Richard (2012). Pentateuchal criticism and the priestly Torah. In: J. Hoffmeier and D. Magary, eds., Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?: A Critical Appraisal of Modern and Postmodern Approaches to Scripture. Wheaton: Crossway, pp. 151-179.
-
Bagger, Matthew (1999). Religious Experience, Justification, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bagger, Matthew (2007). The Uses of Paradox: Religion, Self-Transformation, and the Absurd. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Bailey, Randall, Tat-siong Benny Liew, and Fernando Segovia, eds. (2009). They Were All Together in One Place?: Toward Minority Biblical Criticism. Atlanta: SBL.
-
Baker, Cynthia (2017). Jew. New York: Rutgers University Press.
-
Barclay, John M.G. (2011). Stoic physics and the Christ-event: A review of Troels Engberg-Pedersen, Cosmology and the Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit. JSNT 33 (4), pp. 406-414.
-
Barclay, John M.G. (2017). An identity received from god: The theological configuration of Paul’s kinship discourse. EC 8 (3), pp. 354-372.
-
Barreto, Eric (2010). Ethnic Negotiations: The Function of Race and Ethnicity in Acts 16. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
-
Bayart, Jean-François (2005). The Illusion of Cultural Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Beale, Greg K. (2006). Myth, history, and inspiration: A review article of Inspiration and Incarnation by Peter Enns. JETS 49 (2), pp. 287-312.
-
Beale, Greg K. (2007). A surrejoinder to Peter Enns’s response to G.K. Beale’s JETS review article of his book, Inspiration and Incarnation. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 11 (1), pp. 16-36.
-
Berzon, Todd S. (2016). Classifying Christians: Ethnography, Heresiology, and the Limits of Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Berzon, Todd S. (2018). Ethnicity and early Christianity: New approaches to religious kinship and community. CBR 16 (2), pp. 191-227.
-
Blum, Jason (2012). Retrieving phenomenology of religion as a method for religious studies. JAAR 80 (4), pp. 1025-1048.
-
Borchardt, Francis (2018). A gender theory critique of the historical-critical method. In: H. Tervanotko and S. Svärd, eds., CSTT and Gender, Helsinki: Centre of Excellence in Changes in Sacred Texts and Traditions, pp. 5-12.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. R. Nice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Brenner, Athalya, and Carole Fontaine, eds. (1997). A Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
-
Brown, Ian Phillip (2019). Where indeed was the gospel of Thomas written?: Thomas in Alexandria. JBL 138 (2), pp. 451-472.
-
Brubaker, Rogers (2004). Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Buell, Denise K. (2005). Why This New Race?: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Buell, Denise K. and Caroline Johnson Hodge (2004). The politics of interpretation: The rhetoric of race and ethnicity in Paul. JBL 123 (2), pp. 235-251.
-
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Chaniotis, Angelos (2010). Megatheism: The search for the almighty god and the competition of cults. In: S. Mitchell and P. Van Nuffelen, eds., One God: Pagan Monotheism in the Roman Empire, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112-140.
-
Chaudhry, Ayesha (2017). Islamic legal studies: A critical historiography. In: A. Emon and R. Ahmed, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-40.
-
Concannon, Cavan (2014). “When You Were Gentiles”: Specters of Ethnicity in Roman Corinth and Paul’s Corinthian Correspondence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Crews, Emily (2018). Perhaps action enough. In: B. Stoddard, ed., Method Today: Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion, Bristol: Equinox, pp. 114-118.
-
Dingeldein, Laura (2014). Gaining virtue, gaining Christ: Moral development in the letters of Paul. PhD Diss., Brown University.
-
Donaldson, Terrance (1997). Paul and the Gentiles: Remapping the Apostle’s Convictional World. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Eisenbaum, Pamela (2004). A remedy for having been born of woman: Jesus, gentiles, and genealogy in Romans. JBL 123 (4), pp. 671-702.
-
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (2000). Paul and the Stoics. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.
-
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (2009). The material spirit: Cosmology and ethics in Paul. NTS 55 (2), pp. 179-197.
-
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (2010). Cosmology and the Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (2017). John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Fredriksen, Paula (2017). Paul: The Pagans’ Apostle. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Fredriksen, Paula (2018). How Jewish is god?: Divine ethnicity in Paul’s theology. JBL 137 (1), pp. 193-212.
-
Gerdmar, Anders (2017). Baur and the creation of the Judaism-Hellenism dichotomy. In: M. Bauspiess, C. Landmesser, and D. Lincicum, eds., Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 96-115.
-
Glad, Clarence (1992). Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. Leiden: Brill.
-
Goldenberg, Naomi (2018). Forget about defining “it”: Reflections on thinking differently in religious studies. In: B. Stoddard, ed., Method Today: Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion, Bristol: Equinox, pp. 79-95.
-
Gruen, Erich (1998). Heritage and Hellenism: The Reinvention of Jewish Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Haslanger, Sally (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Hicks-Keeton, Jill (2018). Arguing with Aseneth: Gentile Access to Israel’s “Living God” in Jewish Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Hill, Charles E. (2010). Who Chose the Gospels?: Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Honigman, Sylvie (2014). Tales of High Priests and Taxes: The Books of the Maccabees and the Judean Rebellion against Antiochus IV. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Horn, F.W. (1992). Das Angeld des Geistes: Studien zur paulinischen Pneumatologie. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht.
-
Hurtado, Larry (2013). Resurrection-faith and the ‘historical’ Jesus. JSHJ 11 (1), pp. 35-52.
-
Johnson, Luke Timothy (1998). Religious Experience in Earliest Christianity: A Missing Dimension in New Testament Studies. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Johnson Hodge, Caroline (2005). Apostle to the gentiles: Constructions of Paul’s identity. BI 13 (3), pp. 270-288.
-
Johnson Hodge, Caroline (2007). If Sons, Then Heirs: A Study of Kinship and Ethnicity in the Letters of Paul. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Johnson-DeBaufre, Melanie, and Laura Nasrallah (2011). Beyond the heroic Paul: Toward a feminist and decolonizing approach to the letters of Paul. In: C.D. Stanley, ed., The Colonized Apostle: Paul through Postcolonial Eyes, Minneapolis: Fortress, pp. 161-174.
-
Jones, Christopher (1999). Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Junior, Nyasha (2015). An Introduction to Womanist Biblical Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.
-
Konstan, David (1997). Defining ancient Greek ethnicity. Diaspora 6 (1), pp. 97-110.
-
Kraemer, Ross (2011). Unreliable Witnesses: Religion, Gender, and History in the Greco-Roman Mediterranean. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Lee, Jae Won (2009). Paul and ethnic difference in Romans. In: Randall Bailey, Tat-siong Benny Liew, and Fernando Segovia, eds., Atlanta: SBL, pp. 141-157.
-
Lincoln, Bruce (1996). Theses on method. MTSR 8 (3), pp. 225-227.
-
Ma, John (2013). Re-examining Hanukkah. Marginalia Review of Books: https://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/re-examining-hanukkah/.
-
Malherbe, Abraham (1989). Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Martin, Craig (2018). Impacting scholarship: Or, why methodological agnosticism is impossible. In: J. Blum, ed., The Question of Methodological Naturalism, Leiden: Brill, pp. 53-73.
-
Martyn, J.L. (2002). De-apocalypticizing Paul: An essay focused on Paul and the Stoics by Troels Engberg-Pedersen. JSNT 86 (1), pp. 61-102.
-
Mason, Steve (2007). Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of categorization in ancient history. JSJ 38 (4), pp. 457-512.
-
Masuzawa, Tomoko (2005). The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
McCutcheon, Russell (2001). Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Nasrallah, Laura, and Elizabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, eds. (2009). Prejudice and Christian Beginnings: Investigating Race, Gender, and Ethnicity in Early Christian Studies. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Nongbri, Brent (2005). The motivations of the Maccabees and Judean rhetoric of ancestral tradition. In: C. Bahkos, ed., Ancient Judaism in its Hellenistic Context, Leiden: Brill, pp. 85-111.
-
Ortner, Sherry (2006). Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham: Duke University Press.
-
Parks, Sara (2019a). “The Brooten Phenomenon:” Moving women from the margins in second-temple New Testament scholarship. BCT 15 (1), pp. 46-64.
-
Parks, Sara (2019b). Historical-critical ministry? The biblical studies classroom as restorative secular space. New Blackfriars 100 (1086), pp. 229-244.
-
Proudfoot, Wayne (1985). Religious Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Rabens, Volker (2013). The Holy Spirit and Ethics in Paul: Transformation and Empowering for Religious-Ethical Life, 2nd and rev. ed. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Rainey, Brian (2018). Religion, Ethnicity and Xenophobia in the Bible: A Theoretical, Exegetical, and Theological Survey. New York: Routledge.
-
Ramey, Steven (2015). When acceptance reflects disrespect: The methodological contradictions of accepting participant statements. MTSR 27 (1), pp. 59-81.
-
Reed, Annette Yoshiko (2017). Writing Jewish astronomy in the early Hellenistic age: The Enochic Astronomical Book as Aramaic wisdom and archival impulse. DSD 24 (1), pp. 1-37.
-
Roberts, Erin (2019). Emotion, Morality, and Matthew’s Mythic Jesus. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Roberts, Tyler (2004). Exposure and explanation: On the new protectionism in the study of religion. JAAR 72 (1), pp. 143-172.
-
Roberts, Tyler (2005). Rhetorics of ideology and criticism in the study of religion. JR 85 (3), pp. 367-389.
-
Rollens, Sarah (2019). The anachronism of “early Christian communities.” In: N. Roubekas, ed., Theorizing “Religion” in Antiquity, Bristol: Equinox, pp. 307-324.
-
Rowe, C. Kavin (2016). One True Life: The Stoics and Early Christians as Rival Traditions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Schilbrack, Kevin (2014). Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
-
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth (2000). Jesus and the Politics of Interpretation. New York: Continuum.
-
Sechrest, Love (2009). A Former Jew: Paul and the Dialectics of Race. London: Continuum.
-
Segovia, Fernando (2000). Decolonizing Biblical Studies: A View from the Margins. Maryknoll: Orbis.
-
Sherwood, Yvonne, ed. (2018). The Bible and Feminism: Remapping the Field. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Simmons, K. Merinda (2017). The high stakes of identifying (with) one’s object of study. In: A. Hughes, ed., Theory in a Time of Excess: Beyond Reflection and Explanation in Religious Studies Scholarship, Bristol: Equinox, pp. 59-68.
-
Smith, Jonathan Z. (1990). Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Stowers, Stanley K. (2008). What is “pauline participation in Christ”? In: F. Udoh, S. Heschel, M. Chancey, and G. Tatum, eds., Redefining First-Century Jewish and Christian Identities: Essays in Honor of Ed Parish Sanders, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 352-371.
-
Stowers, Stanley K. (2010). Jesus the teacher and stoic ethics in the gospel of Matthew. In: T. Rasimus, T. Engberg-Pedersen, and I. Dunderberg, eds., Stoicism in Early Christianity, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 59-76.
-
Stowers, Stanley K. (2015). Paul and the terrain of philosophy. EC 6 (2), pp. 141-156.
-
Stowers, Stanley K. (2017). The dilemma of Paul’s physics: Features Stoic-platonist or Platonist-stoic? In: T. Engberg-Pedersen, ed., From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE-100 CE, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-253.
-
Swartz, David (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Thiessen, Matthew (2011). Contesting Conversion: Genealogy, Circumcision, and Identity in Ancient Judaism and Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Thiessen, Matthew (2016). Paul and the Gentile Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Vayntrub, Jacqueline (2018). Before authorship: Solomon and Prov. 1:1. BI 26 (2), pp. 182-206.
-
Vayntrub, Jacqueline (2019). Beyond Orality: Biblical Poetry On Its Own Terms. New York: Routledge.
-
Wasserman, Emma (2008). The Death of the Soul in Romans 7: Sin, Death, and the Law in the Light of Hellenistic Moral-Psychology. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.
-
Weitzman, Steven (2004). Plotting Antiochus’s persecution. JBL 123 (2), pp. 219-234.
-
Wright, N.T. (2013). Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Minneapolis: Fortress.
-
Young, Stephen L. (2015a). Maximizing literacy as a protective strategy: Redescribing evangelical inerrantist scholarship on Israelite literacy. BI 23 (2), pp. 145-173.
-
Young, Stephen L. (2015b). Paul’s ethnic discourse on “Faith”: Christ’s faithfulness and gentile access to the Judean god in Romans. HTR 108 (1), pp. 30-51.
-
Young, Stephen L. (2015c). Protective strategies and the prestige of the “academic”: A religious studies and practice theory redescription of evangelical inerrantist scholarship. BI 23 (1), pp. 1-35.
-
Young, Stephen L. (2017). The rhetoric of disinterest for authorizing our critical position: historicizing critical-theory in religious studies. In: A.W. Hughes, ed., Theory in a Time of Excess: Beyond Reflection and Explanation in Religious Studies Scholarship, Bristol, CT: Equinox, pp. 80-86.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1993 | 204 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 1034 | 14 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1799 | 31 | 9 |
“Let’s Take the Text Seriously”
The Protectionist Doxa of Mainstream New Testament Studies
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Stephen L. Young in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Mainstream New Testament Studies is often a space of repeating, elaborating on, identifying with, or valorizing the voices of NT writings. These common features of NT Studies resemble what scholars in Religious Studies refer to as protectionism: the privileging of a source’s own claims to such an extent that interpreters let them dictate academic analysis. Through examining debates about NT sources and both Greco-Roman ethnic rhetorics and Hellenistic philosophy, this article argues that protectionism structures the doxa of mainstream NT Studies—the commonsense that shapes what is thinkable and what questions / categories feel the most obvious. The field’s protectionism often manifests itself in confused rhetoric about “taking the text seriously” and in the invalidating of scholarship that does something other than describe (i.e., “exegesis”) or elaborate upon NT writings. Protectionism thus helps explain the gendered hierarchies of knowledge in NT Studies: “exegesis” and supposedly “objective Historical-Criticism” are dominant norms that reproduce the field as a masculine dominated space. As a result, critical and redescriptive research—especially by or about women—gets passed over since it seems “niche” or “political / agenda” driven by comparison. Interrogating the protectionism of NT Studies thus permits rethinking the politics of what kinds of scholarship seem the most obvious.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1993 | 204 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 1034 | 14 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1799 | 31 | 9 |