Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This essay reconsiders some of Majid Daneshgar’s arguments in his Studying the Qurʾan in the Muslim Academy. The first part of the essay discusses what counts as the Muslim academy and how it is represented in this book. I examine his arguments that the Muslim academy does not do Islamic studies but rather an apologetic, descriptive, and normative study of Islam, and that the Muslim academy’s reception of Western Qurʾanic scholarship is dismissive, hostile, poor, selective, and apologetic. Its second part examines his argument that the Muslim academy does not engage in a “critical study” of the Qurʾan and Islam. Through a juxtaposition with my experience teaching at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and the development of Islamic higher education in Indonesia, I argue that Daneshgar’s thesis is an over-generalization of what he regards as the Muslim academy, obscuring its plural nature worldwide. I also question whether it is appropriate to talk about the Muslim academy in universal terms. I further argue that to analyze academic study of Islam and the Qurʾan in the Muslim world, one needs to consider the latter’s context and history and its dynamic in relation to secular epistemologies developed in the West.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abdullah, Amin (1996). Studi Agama: Normativitas atau Historisitas? Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Abdullah, Amin (2017). “Islamic studies in higher education in Indonesia: Challenges, impact and prospects for the world community.” Al-Jamiʾah: Journal of Islamic Studies 55 (2): 395-426.
Alatas, Ismail Fajri (2019). Kontroversi disertasi Abdul Aziz dan ambiguitas kesarjanaan. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/kontroversi-disertasi-abdul-aziz-dan-ambiguitas-kesarjanaan-ehwx.
Asad, Talal, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood (2009). Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Asad, Talal, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bauer, Karen (2016). The current state of Qurʾanic studies: Commentary on a roundtable discussion. Journal of International Qurʾanic Studies Association 1: 29-45.
Caeiro, Alexandre and Emmanuelle Stefanidis (2018). Religion, history, ethics: Rethinking the crisis of western Qurʾanic studies. In Matt Sheedy (ed.), Identity, Politics, and the Study of Islam: Current Dilemmas in the Study of Religions. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox, 157-200.
Cornell, Vincent (2010). Reasons public and divine: Liberal democracy, shariʿa fundamentalism, and the epistemological crisis of Islam. In Carl Ernst and Richard Martin (eds), Rethinking Islamic Studies: From Orientalism to Cosmopolitanism. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press, 23-51.
Daneshgar, Majid (2017). Western non-Muslim Qurʾanic studies in Muslim academic contexts: On Rippin’s works from the Middle East to the Malay-Indonesian world. In Majid Daneshgar and Walid A. Saleh (eds.), Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin, Brill, 367-385.
Daneshgar, Majid (2019). Studying the Qurʾan in the Muslim Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari (1992). The intellectualization of Islamic studies in Indonesia. Indonesian Circle 58: 19-32.
Englehardt, Jan Felix (2016). On insiderism and Muslim epistemic communities in the German and US study of Islam. The Muslim World, 106 (4): 740-758.
García, Michael Nieto (2004). The Indonesian free book press. Indonesia 78: 121-145.
Hourani, Albert (1992). Islam in European Thought. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, Aaron W. (2011). The failure of Islamic studies post 9/11: A contextualization and analysis. In William Arnal, Willi Braun, and Russell T. McCutcheon (eds.), Failure and Nerve in the Study of Religion. London: Equinox, 129-146.
Hughes, Aaron W. (2012). The study of Islam before and after September 11: A provocation. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 14 (4-5): 129-146.
Hughes, Aaron W. (2014). Theorizing Islam: Disciplinary Deconstruction and Reconstruction. London and New York: Routledge.
Ismail, Nurjannah (2003). Perempuan dalam Pasungan: Bias Laki-laki dalam penafsiran. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Jabali, Fuad and Jamhari (eds.) (2002). Islam in Indonesia: Islamic Studies and Social Transformation. Montreal, Jakarta: Indonesia-Canada Islamic Higher Education Project.
Jalil, Abdul (2011). Qirāʾāt al-ṣaḥāba: dirāsa taḥlīliyya li ẓahirat al-abdāl fī qirāʾāt Ibn Masʿūd wa atharuha fi l-tafsīr. Master’s Thesis. UNSIQ Wonosobo.
Jamal, Bassām al- (2005). Asbāb al-Nuzūl: ʿIlman min ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Casablanca: al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-ʿArabī.
Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (2009). Pelarangan peredaran barang cetakan berupa 5 buah buku. Retrieved from https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/siaranpers.php?id=244.
Kiptiyah, Siti Mariyatul (2020). Warisan Islam Nusantara: Tafsir Al-Qurʾan Carakan dan Narasi Reformisme. Semarang: eLSA Press.
Kurzmann, Charless and Carl Ernst (2016). Islamic studies in US universities. In Seteney Shami and Cynthia Miller-Idris (eds.), Middle Eastern Studies for the New Millenium: Infrustructure of Knowledge, New York: New York University Press, 320-348.
Lukens-Bull, Ronald (2013). Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia: Continuity and Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Lukman, Fadhli (2018). Menyingkap Jati Diti al-Qurʾan: Sejarah Perjuangan Identitas melalui Teori Asmāʾ al-Qurʾan. Yogyakarta: Bening Pustaka.
Mabrouk, Ali (2015). Nuṣuṣ ḥawl al-Qurʾan fi al-Saʿy waraʾ al-Qurʾan al-ḥayy. Casablanca: al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-ʿArabī.
Mahmood, Saba (2006). Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire: The politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture 18 (2): 323-347.
Makin, Al (2015). Antara Timur dan Barat: Batasan, Dominasi, Relasi, dan Globalisasi. Jakarta, Serambi Ilmu Semesta.
Makin, Al (2018). Bisakah menjadi ilmuwan di Indonesia: Keilmuan, birokrasi, dan globalisasi. Full professorship Inauguration Lecture at Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University.
Martin, Richard (2012). The uses and abuses of criticism in the study of Islam: A Response to Aaron Hughes. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 24 (4): 371-388.
Morgenstein, Ilyse and Zahra Ayubi (2016). Shifting boundaries: The Study of Islam in the humanities. The Muslim World 106 (4): 643-654.
Rahman, Yusuf (2019a). Theological and polemical reception on western scholarship in al-Qurʾan and Tafsir Studies in Indonesia. Jurnal Ushuluddin 27 (1): 1-13.
Rahman, Yusuf (2019b). Indonesian Muslim Rrsponses to non-Muslim approaches to Qurʾanic studies. In Munʾim Sirry (ed.), New Trends in Qurʾanic Studies: Text, Context, and Interpretation. Atlanta: Lockwood Press: 45-60.
Rasmussen, Anne (2010). Women’s Voices, the Recited Qurʾan, and Islamic Music in Indonesia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Rosenthal, Franz (2007). Knowledge Thriumphant: The Concept of Knowledge in Medieval Islam. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Saputro, M. Endy (2011). Alternatif tren studi Qurʾan di Indonesia. Al-Tahrir 11 (1): 1-27.
Sheedy, Matt, ed. (2018). Identity, Politics, and the Study of Islam: Current Dilemmas in the Study of Religions. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.
Stewart, Devin (2018). A modest proposal of Islamic studies. In Matt Sheedy (ed.), Identity, Politics, and the Study of Islam: Current Dilemmas in the Study of Religions. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox, 157-200.
Syamsuddin, Sahiron (2009). Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qurʾan. Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press.
Tayoub, Abdulkader (2018). Decolonizing the study of religions: Muslim intellectuals and the enlightenment project of religious studies. Journal for the Study of Religion 31 (2): 7-35.
Wahhāyibī, Muḥammad al-Munṣif al- (2013). Allāh wa-al-mutakallimūna maʿahu fī al-Qurʾān: al-Qurʾān bayna al-shafawī wa-al-kitābī: dirāsah fī al-khiṭāb al-Qurʾānī. Tunis: Dār Āfāq Brisbaktīf li l-Nashr.
Wijaya, Aksin (2004). Menggugat Otentisitas Wahyu Tuhan: Kritik Atas Nalar Tafsir Gender. Yogyakarta: Safirian Insania Press.
Wijaya, Aksin (2009). Arah Baru Studi Ulum Al-Qurʾan: Memburu Pesan Tuhan di Balik Fenomena Budaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Woodward, Mark (ed.) (1996). Toward a New Paradigm: Recent Developments in Indonesian Islamic Thought. Tempe: Arizona State University.
Zayn, Muḥammad Shawqī al- (2016). Al-Sūra wa l-lughz: al-taʿwīl al-ṣūfī li l-Qurʾān ʿinda Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn ʿArabī. Rabat: Muʾminūn bi lā Ḥudūd li l-Dirāsa wa l-Abḥāth.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 479 | 231 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 28 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 36 | 1 |
This essay reconsiders some of Majid Daneshgar’s arguments in his Studying the Qurʾan in the Muslim Academy. The first part of the essay discusses what counts as the Muslim academy and how it is represented in this book. I examine his arguments that the Muslim academy does not do Islamic studies but rather an apologetic, descriptive, and normative study of Islam, and that the Muslim academy’s reception of Western Qurʾanic scholarship is dismissive, hostile, poor, selective, and apologetic. Its second part examines his argument that the Muslim academy does not engage in a “critical study” of the Qurʾan and Islam. Through a juxtaposition with my experience teaching at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and the development of Islamic higher education in Indonesia, I argue that Daneshgar’s thesis is an over-generalization of what he regards as the Muslim academy, obscuring its plural nature worldwide. I also question whether it is appropriate to talk about the Muslim academy in universal terms. I further argue that to analyze academic study of Islam and the Qurʾan in the Muslim world, one needs to consider the latter’s context and history and its dynamic in relation to secular epistemologies developed in the West.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 479 | 231 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 28 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 36 | 1 |