The Role of Religious Experiences and Religious Institutions: Comparing Peter L. Berger’s and Hans Joas’ Approach to Religion
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Isaak Deman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Hans Joas (born 1948) has repeatedly criticized Peter L. Berger (1929–2017) for placing religious experiences in the cognitive realm, where it runs the risk of being “contaminated” by secularization and pluralism. Instead, Joas has proposed to locate religious experiences in the “deeper layers” of the human person, where it is protected against mere cognitive reductionism and against contamination by secularization and pluralism. Despite his critique, Joas follows a similar path of Berger, as he explains the phenomenon of religion from an inductive point of view that originates in the experiential realm. This article demonstrates how Joas’ approach operates on a similar methodology like the one of Berger and ultimately results in similar theoretical conclusions despite their differing theoretical foundations. Moreover, this article illuminates an implicit methodological similarity between Joas and Berger that, on the one hand, differs from one of the taken-for-granted methodologies in the discipline of sociology (of religion), and, on the other hand, strongly influences the disposition of religious institutions in their definition of religion.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Berger, Peter L. (1961). The Noise of Solemn Assemblies: Christian Commitment and the Religious Establishment in America. New York: Doubleday.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1970). A Rumour of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural. London: Allan Lane.
-
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann (1971). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen Lane.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1974). Some second thoughts on substantive versus functional definitions of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13 (2): 125–133.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1979). The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation. New York: Doubleday.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1997). Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience. Berlin: De Gruyter.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2001). Postscript. In L. Woodhead, P. Heelas, & D. Martin (eds.), Peter Berger and the Study of Religion, 189–198. London, Routledge.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2004). Questions of Faith: A Skeptical Affirmation of Christianity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2008). Im Morgenlicht der Erinnerung: Eine Kindheit in turbulunter Zeit. Wien: Molden Verlag.
-
Berger Peter L. & Anton Zijderveld (2009). In Praise of Doubt: How to have Convictions without becoming A Fanatic. New York: HarperCollins.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2011). Adventures of an Accidental Sociologist: How to Explain the World without becoming A Bore. New York: Prometheus Books.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2014). The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward a Paradigm of Religion in a Pluralist Age Boston: De Gruyter.
-
Berger, Peter L. (2016). The good of religious pluralism: Peter L. Berger outlines four benefits of pluralism. First Things 262: 39–42.
-
Dorrien, Garry (2001). Berger: Theology and Sociology. L. Woodhead, P. Heelas, & D. Martin (eds.), Peter Berger and the Study of Religion, 26–39. London: Routledge.
-
Durkheim, Émile (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press.
-
Heidegren, Carl-Göran (2017). An Interview with Hans Joas. https://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1143776/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
-
James, William (1985). The Varieties of Religious Experience. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
-
Joas, Hans (2000). The Genesis of Values. Trans. by Gregory Moore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Joas, Hans (2008). Do We Need Religion? On the Experience of Self-Transcendence. Boulder: Paradigm.
-
Joas, Hans (2014). Faith as an Option: Possible Futures for Christianity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Joas, Hans (2016). Sacralization and desacralization: Political domination and religious interpretation. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 36 (2): 25–42.
-
Joas, Hans (2017). Die Macht des Heiligen: Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
-
Joas, Hans (2018). Nationalismus kann religiös und antireligiös sein: Hans Joas im Gesprech mit Anne Françoise Weber. https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/religionssoziologe-hans-joas-nationalismus-kann-religioes.1278.de.html?dram:article_id=427558.
-
Morgan, Robert, and Michael Pye (1977). Ernst Troeltsch: Writings on Theology and Religion. Atlanta: John Knox Press.
-
Pfadenhauer, Michaela (2013). The New Sociology of Knowledge: The Life and Work of Peter L. Berger. Trans. by Miriam Geoghegan. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
-
Pollack, Detlef (2015). Religionssoziologie in Deutschland seit 1945: Tendenzen – Kontroversen – Konsequenzen. Köln Z Soziol 67: 433–474.
-
Porpora, Douglas V. (2006). Methodological Atheism, Methodological Agnosticism and Religious Experience. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (1): 57–75.
-
Smart, Ninian (2000). Methods in My Life. In Jon R. Stone (ed.), The Craft of Religious Studies, 18–35. New York: Palgrave.
-
Steets Silke, and Hubert Knoblauch (2018). Sacred Canopies and Invisible Religions: The Dialectical Construction of Religion in Berger and Luckmann. In T. Hjelm (ed.), Peter L. Berger and the Sociology of Religion: 50 Years After The Sacred Canopy, 85–102. New York: Bloomsbury.
-
Wilson, Bryan (1982). The Academic Position of the Sociology of Religion in Modern Science. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 9 (1): 9–40.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 752 | 172 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 110 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 301 | 32 | 0 |
The Role of Religious Experiences and Religious Institutions: Comparing Peter L. Berger’s and Hans Joas’ Approach to Religion
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Isaak Deman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Hans Joas (born 1948) has repeatedly criticized Peter L. Berger (1929–2017) for placing religious experiences in the cognitive realm, where it runs the risk of being “contaminated” by secularization and pluralism. Instead, Joas has proposed to locate religious experiences in the “deeper layers” of the human person, where it is protected against mere cognitive reductionism and against contamination by secularization and pluralism. Despite his critique, Joas follows a similar path of Berger, as he explains the phenomenon of religion from an inductive point of view that originates in the experiential realm. This article demonstrates how Joas’ approach operates on a similar methodology like the one of Berger and ultimately results in similar theoretical conclusions despite their differing theoretical foundations. Moreover, this article illuminates an implicit methodological similarity between Joas and Berger that, on the one hand, differs from one of the taken-for-granted methodologies in the discipline of sociology (of religion), and, on the other hand, strongly influences the disposition of religious institutions in their definition of religion.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 752 | 172 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 110 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 301 | 32 | 0 |
