Arnal, William E. (2005). The Symbolic Jesus: Historical Scholarship, Judaism and the Construction of Contemporary Identity. New York: Routledge.

Arnal, William E. (2005). The Symbolic Jesus: Historical Scholarship, Judaism and the Construction of Contemporary Identity. New York: Routledge. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cameron, Ron (2018). The labors of Burton Mack: Scholarship that’s made a difference. Forum, third series 7 (1), pp. 21–60.

Cameron, Ron (2018). The labors of Burton Mack: Scholarship that’s made a difference. Forum, third series 7 (1), pp. 21–60. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cameron, Ron, and Merrill P. Miller (2004a). Introduction: Ancient myths and modern theories of Christian origins. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 1–30. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Cameron, Ron, and Merrill P. Miller (2004a). Introduction: Ancient myths and modern theories of Christian origins. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 1–30. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Cameron, Ron, and Merrill P. Miller (2004b). Conclusion: Redescribing Christian origins. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 497–516. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Cameron, Ron, and Merrill P. Miller (2004b). Conclusion: Redescribing Christian origins. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 497–516. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Lincoln, Bruce (2014). Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classification. Second Edition. New York. Oxford University Press.

Lincoln, Bruce (2014). Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classification. Second Edition. New York. Oxford University Press. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mack, Burton L. (1988). A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

Mack, Burton L. (1988). A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Philadelphia: Fortress Press. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mack, Burton L. (1996). On redescribing Christian origins. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8 (3), pp. 247–269.

Mack, Burton L. (1996). On redescribing Christian origins. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8 (3), pp. 247–269. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mack, Burton L. (2001a). Caretakers and critics: On the social role of scholars who study religion. Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion 30 (2), pp. 32–38.

Mack, Burton L. (2001a). Caretakers and critics: On the social role of scholars who study religion. Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion 30 (2), pp. 32–38. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mack, Burton L. (2001b). The Christian Myth: Origins, Logic, and Legacy. New York and London: Continuum.

Mack, Burton L. (2001b). The Christian Myth: Origins, Logic, and Legacy. New York and London: Continuum. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Mack, Burton L. (2014). A secular bible? Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 26 (2), pp. 183–201.

Mack, Burton L. (2014). A secular bible? Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 26 (2), pp. 183–201. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Martin, Luther H. (2000). History, historiography and Christian origins. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 29 (1), pp. 69–89.

Martin, Luther H. (2000). History, historiography and Christian origins. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 29 (1), pp. 69–89. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

McCutcheon, Russell T., ed. (1999). The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader. Controversies in the Study of Religion. London and New York: Cassell.

McCutcheon, Russell T., ed. (1999). The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader. Controversies in the Study of Religion. London and New York: Cassell. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

McCutcheon, Russell T. (2001). Critics not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press.

McCutcheon, Russell T. (2001). Critics not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Smith, Jonathan Z. (1990). Drudgery Divine: On the Comparisons of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Jordan Lectures in Comparative Religion 14. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Smith, Jonathan Z. (1990). Drudgery Divine: On the Comparisons of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Jordan Lectures in Comparative Religion 14. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; Chicago: University of Chicago Press. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Smith, Jonathan Z. (2009). The bible and religion. Journal of Biblical Literature 128 (1), pp. 5–27.

Smith, Jonathan Z. (2009). The bible and religion. Journal of Biblical Literature 128 (1), pp. 5–27. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Smith, Jonathan Z. (2004). Dayyeinu. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 483–487. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Smith, Jonathan Z. (2004). Dayyeinu. In: Ron Cameron and Merrill P. Miller, eds., Redescribing Christian Origins, pp. 483–487. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Young, Stephen L. (2020). “Let’s take the text seriously”: The protectionist doxa of mainstream New Testament studies. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 32 (4), pp. 328–363.

Young, Stephen L. (2020). “Let’s take the text seriously”: The protectionist doxa of mainstream New Testament studies. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 32 (4), pp. 328–363. )| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation