Burton Mack’s 1996 article “On Redescribing Christian Origins” was a classic of the discipline. In my view, one of its most enduring contributions is its recognition that the centrality of the New Testament’s view of Christian Origins survives despite a growing recognition that, technically, it ought to be sidelined – that it is protected by a “ring of fire.” Further, he argued that the perseverance of this centrality was a major factor inhibiting the influence of New Testament studies on other disciplines. In this essay, I argue that the centrality of the Hebrew Bible’s vision of Israelite origins as a starting point for contemporary debates, even among those who regard it as a fiction, is characterized by a similar avoidance of certain necessary recognitions and is inhibiting to a similar degree.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Barstad, Hans M. (1996). The Myth of the Empty Land: A Study in the History and Archaeology of Judah During the “Exilic” Period. Symbolae Osloenses Fasciculus Suppletorius 28. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Brubaker, Rogers (2004). Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crouch, Carly L. (2014). The Making of Israel: Cultural Diversity in the Southern Levant and the Formation of Ethnic Identity in Deuteronomy. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill.
Evans, Paul S. (2017). Creating a new ‘Great Divide’: The exoticization of ancient culture in some recent applications of orality studies to the Bible. Journal of Biblical Literature 136 (4), pp. 749–764.
Fleming, Daniel (2012). The Legacy of Israel in Judah’s Bible. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ibrahim, Vivian (2010). Ethnicity. In: Stephen M. Caliendo and Charlton D. McIlwain, eds., The Routledge Companion to Race and Ethnicity, pp. 12–20. London, UK: Routledge.
Kim, Uriah Y. (2005). Decolonizing Josiah: Toward a Postcolonial Reading of the Deuteronomistic History. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.
Knoppers, Gary N. (2013). Jews and Samaritans: The Origins and History of Their Early Relations. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, Bruce (1989). Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual and Classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lipschits, Oded (2005). The Fall and Rise of Jerusalem: The History of Judah under Babylonian Rule. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Lipschits, Oded, and Joseph Blenkinsopp (2003). After the ‘myth of the empty land’: Major challenges in the study of neo-Babylonian Judah. In: Judah and the Judeans in the Neo-Babylonian Period, pp. 3–20. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Mack, Burton L. (1996). On redescribing Christian origins. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8 (3), pp. 247–269.
Middlemas, Jill A. (2009). Going beyond the myth of the empty land: A reassessment of the early Persian period. In: Gary N. Knoppers, Lester L. Grabbe, and Dierdre N. Fulton, eds., Exile and Restoration Revisited: Essays on the Babylonian and Persian Periods in Memory of Peter R. Ackroyd, pp. 174–194. London; New York: T & T Clark.
Miller, James C. (2008). Ethnicity and the Hebrew Bible: Problems and prospects. Currents in Biblical Research 6 (2), pp. 170–213.
Schneider, Tammi J. (2002). Through Assyria’s eyes – Israel’s relationship with Judah. Expedition 44 (3), pp. 9–15.
Tobolowsky, Andrew (2020). The Hebrew Bible as mythic ‘vocabulary’: Towards a Nnw comparative mythology. Religions 11 (9), pp. 459.
Tobolowsky, Andrew (2022). The Myth of the Twelve Tribes of Israel: New Identities Across Time and Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wimmer, Andreas (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology 113 (4), pp. 970–1022.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 153 | 153 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 74 | 74 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 153 | 153 | 8 |
Burton Mack’s 1996 article “On Redescribing Christian Origins” was a classic of the discipline. In my view, one of its most enduring contributions is its recognition that the centrality of the New Testament’s view of Christian Origins survives despite a growing recognition that, technically, it ought to be sidelined – that it is protected by a “ring of fire.” Further, he argued that the perseverance of this centrality was a major factor inhibiting the influence of New Testament studies on other disciplines. In this essay, I argue that the centrality of the Hebrew Bible’s vision of Israelite origins as a starting point for contemporary debates, even among those who regard it as a fiction, is characterized by a similar avoidance of certain necessary recognitions and is inhibiting to a similar degree.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 153 | 153 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 74 | 74 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 153 | 153 | 8 |