Critical Religion and the Sociology of Religion
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Warren S. Goldstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article discusses the relevance of Critical Religion to the sociology of religion. Critical Religion argues that the category of “religion” is a Western concept that through colonialism and imperialism has been superimposed over non-Western societies. In contrast, it offers a critical theory of or critical sociology of religion, which evaluates the positive and negatives aspects of what we call religion. The article provides a summary of key proponents of critical religion then uses it to discuss the secularization debate which runs through the classics and the old and new paradigms in the sociology of religion. It discusses the lived religion methodology and problematizes that through its lack of distinction between the religious and the secular, it overemphasizes the role of religion. Finally, the article offers a more scientific and neutral redefinition of the category of religion as a solution to the problems with the category raised by critical religion.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ammerman, Nancy T. (1997). “Golden rule Christianity: Lived religion in the American mainstream.” In: D. Hall (ed.) Lived Religion in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 196–216.
-
Ammerman, Nancy Tatom (2021). Studying Lived Religion: Contexts and Practices. New York: New York University Press.
-
Asad, Talal (1993). Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
-
Asad, Talal (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bellah, Robert (1970). Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditionalist World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1970). A Rumor of Angels: Modern Societal and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural. Garden City: Doubleday.
-
Berger, Peter L. (1979). The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation. Garden City: Anchor Books.
-
Casanova, José (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Durkheim, Emile (1974). Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
-
Durkheim, Emile (1984). The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York: The Free Press.
-
Durkheim, Emile (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translation by Karen Fields. New York: The Free Press.
-
Fitzgerald, Timothy (2000). The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Goldstein, Warren S., Roland Boer, and Jonathan Boyarin (2013). “Editorial.” Critical Research on Religion, 1(1): 3–8.
-
Goldstein, Warren S., Rebekka King, and Jonathan Boyarin (2016). “Critical Theory of Religion vs. Critical Religion.” Critical Research on Religion, 4(1): 3–7.
-
Goldstein, Warren S. (2009a). “Patterns of Secularization and Religious Rationalization in Emile Durkheim and Max Weber.” Implicit Religion, 12(2): 165–185.
-
Goldstein, Warren S. (2009b). “Secularization patterns in the old paradigm.” Sociology of Religion, 70(2), pp. 157–178.
-
Goldstein, Warren S. (2020). What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon. Critical Research on Religion, 8(1), pp. 73–86.
-
Hegel, G.W.F. (1827) (2006). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, One Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Hervieu-Léger, Daniéle. (1997). “‘What scripture tells me’ Spontaneity and Regulation within the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.” In D. Hall (ed.) Lived Religion in America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 22–40.
-
Horii, Mitsutoshi (2018). The Category of ‘Religion’ in Contemporary Japan. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Horii, Mitsutoshi (2021). ‘Religion’ and ‘Secular’ Categories in Sociology: Decolonizing the Modern Myths. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Josephson, Jason Ananda (2012). The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Kalberg, Stephen (1980). “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes of History.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 1145–1179.
-
King, Richard (1999). Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and ‘The Mystic East’. London and New York: Routledge.
-
Kippenberg, Hans (2021). “Dialectics of disenchantment: The devaluation of the objective world and the revaluation of subjective religiosity.” In R. Yelle and L. Trein (eds.) Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber’s Idea of Modernity, edited by Robert A. Yelle and Lorenz Trein, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 9–30.
-
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels [1848] (1978). “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In R. Tucker (ed.) The Marx-Engels: Reader 2nd Edition, New York: W.W. Norton & Co, pp. 469–500.
-
Masuzawa, Tomoko (2005). The Invention of World Religions: Or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
-
McCutcheon, Russell T. (1997). Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
-
McGuire, Meredith B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Morello, Gustavo, S.J. (2021). Lived Religion in Latin America: An Enchanted Modernity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Niebuhr, H. Richard (1987). The Social Sources of Denominationalism. Gloucester: Peter Smith.
-
Orsi, Robert (1997). “Everyday miracles: The study of lived religion.” In D. Hall (ed.) Lived Religion in America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–21.
-
Schilbrack, Kevin (2020). “A metaphysics for the study of religion: A critical reading of Russell McCutcheon.” Critical Research on Religion, 8(1), pp. 87–100.
-
Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982). Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Smith, Jonathan Z. (1998). “Religion, religions, religious.” In M. Taylor (ed.) Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 269–284.
-
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell [1962] (1991). The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
-
Spickard, James. (2017). Alternative Sociologies of Religion: Through Non-Western Eyes. New York: New York University Press.
-
Stark, Rodney and William Sims Bainbridge. (1985). The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival, and Cult Formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Troeltsch, Ernst (1992). The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
-
Warner, R. Stephen (1993). “Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1044–1093.
-
Watts, Glenn and Sharday Mosurinjohn (2022). “Can critical religion play by Its own rules? Why there must be more ways to be ‘critical’ in the study of religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 90(2), pp. 317–334.
-
Weber, Max (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
-
Weber, Max. (1978). Economy and Society, 2 Vols. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Wenger, Tisa. (2009). We Have a Religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious Freedom. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 553 | 548 | 41 |
| Full Text Views | 58 | 58 | 8 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 253 | 250 | 20 |
Critical Religion and the Sociology of Religion
In: Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionSearch for other papers by Warren S. Goldstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article discusses the relevance of Critical Religion to the sociology of religion. Critical Religion argues that the category of “religion” is a Western concept that through colonialism and imperialism has been superimposed over non-Western societies. In contrast, it offers a critical theory of or critical sociology of religion, which evaluates the positive and negatives aspects of what we call religion. The article provides a summary of key proponents of critical religion then uses it to discuss the secularization debate which runs through the classics and the old and new paradigms in the sociology of religion. It discusses the lived religion methodology and problematizes that through its lack of distinction between the religious and the secular, it overemphasizes the role of religion. Finally, the article offers a more scientific and neutral redefinition of the category of religion as a solution to the problems with the category raised by critical religion.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 553 | 548 | 41 |
| Full Text Views | 58 | 58 | 8 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 253 | 250 | 20 |
