The Social Construction of Reality (1966) Revisited: Epistemology and Theorizing in the Study of Religion

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This paper takes the social constructivist approach, formulated by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, as a starting point for an investigation into epistemology and theorizing in the contemporary study of religion. It discusses various strands of scholarship in dialogue with social constructivism and questions in particular the reductionism of radical constructivist positions. Exploring the boundaries of the classical social constructivist paradigm, the article argues that students of religion should consider the implication of social, historical, embodied and material structures in the production of knowledge about religion. For that purpose, it draws on various soft realist approaches to stress the importance of remaining attentive to positionality (reflecting on the sites from where we theorize) and contextuality (reflecting on the inter-relation of discourse and materiality) in theorizing “religion”. Finally, the article suggests that soft realist positions can be integrated in a slightly broadened social constructivist framework for the study of religion.

The Social Construction of Reality (1966) Revisited: Epistemology and Theorizing in the Study of Religion

in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Sections

References

  • AbeysekaraAnanda (2011). The Un-translatability of religion, the un-translatability of life: Thinking Talal Asad’s thought unthought in the study of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 23: 257-282.

  • AllesGregory D. (ed.) (2008). Religious Studies: A Global View. London: Routledge.

  • ArnalWilliam E. (1998). What if I don’t want to play tennis? A rejoinder to Russell McCutcheon on postmodernism and religion. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 27: 61-88.

  • ArnalWilliam E. (2000). Definition. In W. Braun & R. T. McCutcheon (eds.) Guide to the Study of Religion21-34. London: Cassell.

  • ArnalWilliam E. & Russell McCutcheon (2012). The Sacred Is the Profane: The Political Nature of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • AsadTalal (2001). Reading a modern classic: W. C. Smith’s The Meaning and End of Religion. History of Religions 40 (3): 205-222.

  • AsadTalal (2003). Formations of the Secular. Christianity Islam Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • AsadTalal (2006). Responses. In D. Scott & Ch. Hirschkind (eds.) Powers of the Secular Modern. Talal Asad and his Interlocuters206-241. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • BaderVeit (2001). Culture and identity: Contesting constructivism. Ethnicities 1: 251-273.

  • BaumannGerd (2001). Culture and collectivity: Constructivism as the methodology of choice: A reply to Veit Bader. Ethnicities 1: 274-282.

  • BenavidesGustavo (2000). What raw materials are used in the manifacture of religion. Culture and Religion 1 (1): 113-122.

  • BenavidesGustavo (2003). Review: Discovering Religious History in the Modern Age. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 71: 895-903.

  • BergerPeter L. (1974). Some second thoughts on substantive versus functional definitions of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13 (2): 125-133.

  • BergerPeter L. & Thomas Luckmann (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.

  • BergunderMichael (2014). What is religion? The unexplained subject matter of Religious Studies. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 26: 246-286.

  • BochingerChristoph & Jörg Rüpke (2015a). Dynamics of religion-past and present: Looking forward to the xxi iahr World Congress, Erfurt/Germany 2015. Numen: The Academic Study of Religion and the IAHR: Past Present and Prospects (Numen Supplements): 283-300.

  • BochingerChristoph & Katharina Frank (2015b). Das religionswissenschaftliche Dreieck. Elemente eines integrativen Religionskonzepts. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 23 (2): 343-370.

  • CadenaMarisol de la (2015). Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • CurtisFinbarr (2009). No universalizing deductive-nomological explanations, please; we’re Irish: A response to Thomas A. Tweed’s Crossing and Dwelling. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 77 (2): 424-433.

  • DegeleNina & Timothy Simms (2004). Bruno Latour (*1947). Post-Konstruktivismus pur. In M. L. HofmannT. F. Korta & S. Niekisch (eds.) Culture Club. Klassiker der Kulturtheorie259-275. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

  • DresslerMarkus (2013). Writing Religion. The Making of Turkish Alevi Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • DresslerMarkus & Arvind-Pal S. Mandair (eds.) (2011). Secularism and Religion-Making. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • DubuissonDaniel (2003). The Western Construction of Religion: Myths Knowledge and Ideology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

  • DurkheimÉmile (2005). The Rules of Sociological Method. In K. Thompson (ed.) Readings from Emile Durkheim43-57. London: Routledge.

  • FreibergerOliverMagnus Echtler & Afe Adogame (eds.) (2013). Alternative Voices: A Plurality Approach for Religious Studies. Essays in Honor of Ulrich Berner. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • GreneMarjorie (1966). Positionality in the philosophy of Helmuth Plessner. The Review of Metaphysics 20 (2): 250-277.

  • HackingIan (2000). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • HughesAaron W. (2009). Boundary maintenance: Religions as organic-cultural flows. In M. Stausberg (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Religion. A Critical Companion. 209-223. London: Routledge.

  • HurdElizabeth Shakman (2015). Beyond Religious Freedom. The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ImhoffSarah (2016). The creation story, or how we learned to stop worrying and love Schempp.Journal of the American Academy of Religion 84 (2): 466-497.

  • IqbalBasit K. (2017). Thinking about method. A conversation with Talal Asad. Qui Parle 26 (1): 195-218.

  • KippenbergHans G. & Kocku von Stuckrad (2003). Einführung in die Religionswissenschaft. Gegenstände und Begriffe. München: Beck.

  • KleineChristoph (2010). Wozu außereuropäische Religionsgeschichte? Überlegungen zu ihrem Nutzen für die religionswissenschaftliche Theorie- und Identitätsbildung. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 18 (1): 2-38.

  • KneerGeorg (2009). Jenseits von Realismus und Antirealismus. Eine Verteidigung des Sozialkonstruktivismus gegenüber seinen postkonstruktivistischen Kritikern. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 38 (1): 5-25.

  • KnoblauchHubert (2013a). Communicative constructivism and mediatization. Communication Theory 23 (3): 297-315.

  • KnoblauchHubert (2013b). Latours Popanz: Über Mißverständnisse des Sozialkonstruktivismus. SozBlog: online: http://soziologie.de/blog/2013/08/latours-popanz-ueber-missverstaendnisse-des-sozialkonstruktivismus/.

  • KnoblauchHubert & Bernt Schnettler (2004). Vom sinnhaften Aufbau zur kommunikativen Konstruktion. In M. Gabriel (ed.) Paradigmen der akteurszentrierten Soziologie121-137. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

  • KnoblauchHubert & René Wilke (2016). The common denominator: The reception and impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality. Humanistic Studies 39: 51-69.

  • KrechVolkard (2002). Wissenschaft und Religion. Studien zur Geschichte der Religionsforschung in Deutschland 1871 bis 1933. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

  • KrechVolkard (2006). Wohin mit der Religionswissenchaft? Skizze zur Lage der Religionsforschung und zu Möglichkeiten ihrer Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 58 (2): 97-113.

  • LatourBruno (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • LatourBruno (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McCutcheonRussell T. (1997). Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McCutcheonRussell T. (2001). Critics not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. New York: SUNY Press.

  • McCutcheonRussell T. (2014). A Modest Proposal on Method: Essaying the Study of Religion. Leiden: Brill.

  • McCutcheonRussell T. (2015). The category “religion” in recent publications: Twenty years later. Numen 62: 119-141.

  • SaarMartin. (2008). Understanding genealogy. History, power, and the self. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3): 295-314.

  • SchilbrackKevin (2012). The sociological construction of “religion” and its limits: a critical reading of Timothy Fitzgerald. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 24: 97-117.

  • SchilbrackKevin (2017). A realist social ontology of religion. Religion 47 (2): 161-178.

  • SchrodePaula (2016). Islam als Forschungsgegenstand: Ein diskursiver Ansatz. In K. Lehmann & A. Jödicke (eds.). Einheit und Differenz in der Religionswissenschaft: Standortbestimmungen mit Hilfe eines Mehr-Ebenen-Modells von Religion177-197. Würzburg: Ergon.

  • SchülerSebastian (2014). Zwischen Naturalismus und Sozialkonstruktivismus. Kognitive, körperliche, emotionale und soziale Dimensionen von Religion. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 22 (1): 5-36.

  • ScottDavid (2006). The tragic sensibility of Talal Asad. In D. Scott & Ch. Hirschkind (eds.) Powers of the Secular Modern. Talal Asad and his Interlocuters134-153. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • SmithJonathan Z. (1998). Religion, religions, religious. In M. C. Taylor (ed.) Critical Terms for Religious Studies269-284. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • StalderFelix (2000). Beyond constructivism: Towards a realistic realism. A review of Bruno Latour’s Pandora’s Hope. The Information Society 16online: http://felix.openflows.com/html/pandora.html.

  • Stausberg Michael (ed.) (2009). Contemporary Theories of Religion. A Critical Companion. London: Routledge.

  • StausbergMichael & Steven Engler (eds.) (2017). The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • SteetsSilke (2015). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der gebauten Welt. Eine Architektursoziologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

  • SrenskiIvan (2010). Talal Asad’s “religion” trouble and a way out. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22: 136-155.

  • StuckradKocku von (2014). The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change 1800-2000. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • TweedThomas (2006). Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • TweedThomas (2016). Valuing the Study of Religion: Improving difficult dialogues within and beyond the aar’s “big tent”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 84 (2): 287-322.

  • VasquezManuel (2009). The limits of the hydrodynamics of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 77 (2): 434-445.

  • VasquezManuel (2011). More than Belief. A Materialist Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 196 196 60
Full Text Views 240 240 43
PDF Downloads 9 9 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0