This article revisits the Samanid mausoleum in Bukhara (circa tenth century, Uzbekistan) to shed new light on the historical context of this canonical monument of Islamic architecture. First, it documents the architectural properties of the Samanid mausoleum and integrates available archaeological and textual data, such as the site plan of the building, inscriptions, endowment deeds (waqf), and the recently discovered Khuttalon votive as a new prototype. These new sources allow one to sketch a more nuanced historical context that helps to better understand the mausoleum’s broader societal function, the tenth-century Bukharan patron’s intention in supporting this building’s construction, and his choice of style. It is argued that the building reflects the transitional nature of the period, before the “Persian Renaissance” under Nasr b. Ahmad (r. 914–43). Stylistic discussion suggests that it is simplistic to attribute this building to the influence of any single tradition. The Khuttalon votive challenges the Persian- and Sogdian-centered views that have dominated the study of the monument, pointing to the limitations of these perspectives.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 516 | 516 | 116 |
Full Text Views | 23 | 23 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 279 | 279 | 5 |
This article revisits the Samanid mausoleum in Bukhara (circa tenth century, Uzbekistan) to shed new light on the historical context of this canonical monument of Islamic architecture. First, it documents the architectural properties of the Samanid mausoleum and integrates available archaeological and textual data, such as the site plan of the building, inscriptions, endowment deeds (waqf), and the recently discovered Khuttalon votive as a new prototype. These new sources allow one to sketch a more nuanced historical context that helps to better understand the mausoleum’s broader societal function, the tenth-century Bukharan patron’s intention in supporting this building’s construction, and his choice of style. It is argued that the building reflects the transitional nature of the period, before the “Persian Renaissance” under Nasr b. Ahmad (r. 914–43). Stylistic discussion suggests that it is simplistic to attribute this building to the influence of any single tradition. The Khuttalon votive challenges the Persian- and Sogdian-centered views that have dominated the study of the monument, pointing to the limitations of these perspectives.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 516 | 516 | 116 |
Full Text Views | 23 | 23 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 279 | 279 | 5 |